Evaluation of the CooperVision, Inc. Fanfilcon A and Enfilcon A Daily Wear Contact Lenses When Used for Frequent Replacement for up to One (1) Month of Daily Wear
1 other identifier
interventional
92
1 country
6
Brief Summary
This study is a masked, multi-center, daily wear, monthly replacement, bilateral, randomized, lens blocked (subjects remain in the same lens brand throughout the study) concurrent control study enrolling up to 90 subjects with a study duration of approximately three months. Subjects will be randomized into the study contact lenses in a two to one (2:1) ratio of fanfilcon A lens (test) to enfilcon A lens (control).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2015
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
6 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 16, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 21, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 21, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 27, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 8, 2017
CompletedSeptember 25, 2019
September 1, 2019
4 months
September 16, 2015
January 16, 2017
September 16, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (20)
Epithelial Edema - Fanfilcon A Lens (Test)
Epithelial edema is assessed for fanfilcon A lens (test). Grading Scale 0-4, 0=none, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe
Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
Epithelial Edema - Enfilcon A Lens (Control)
Epithelial edema is assessed for enfilcon A lens (control). Grading scale 0-4, 0=none, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe
Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
Stromal Edema - Fanfilcon A Lens (Test)
Stromal edema is assessed for fanfilcon A lens (test). Grading Scale 0-4, 0=none, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe
Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
Stromal Edema - Enfilcon A Lens (Control)
Stromal edema is assessed for enfilcon A lens (control). Grading Scale 0-4, 0=none, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe
Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
Corneal Infiltrates - Fanfilcon A Lens (Test)
Corneal infiltrates is assessed for fanfilcon A lens (test). Grading scale: Absent/present
Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
Corneal Infiltrates - Enfilcon A Lens (Control)
Corneal infiltrates is assessed for enfilcon A lens (control). Grading scale: absent/present
Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
Corneal Vascularization - Fanfilcon A Lens (Test)
Corneal vascularization is assessed for fanfilcon A lens (test). Grading Scale 0-4, 0=none, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe
Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
Corneal Vascularization - Enfilcon A Lens (Control)
Corneal vascularization is assessed for enfilcon A lens (control). Grading Scale 0-4, 0=none, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe
Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
Corneal Staining - Fanfilcon A Lens (Test)
Corneal staining with fluorescein is assessed for fanfilcon A lens (test). Grading Scale 0-4, 0=none, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe; Grading regions: S - Superior, T - Temporal, C - Central, N - Nasal, I - Inferior;
Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
Corneal Staining - Enfilcon A Lens (Control)
Corneal staining with fluorescein is assessed for enfilcon A lens (control). Grading Scale 0-4, 0=none, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe; Grading regions: S - Superior, T - Temporal, C - Central, N - Nasal, I - Inferior;
Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
Limbal Hyperemia - Fanfilcon A Lens (Test)
Limbal hyperemia is assessed for fanfilcon A lens (test). Grading Scale 0-4, 0=none, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe
Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
Limbal Hyperemia - Enfilcon A Lens (Control)
Limbal hyperemia is assessed for enfilcon A lens (control). Grading Scale 0-4, 0=none, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe
Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
Bulbar Hyperemia - Fanfilcon A Lens (Test)
Bulbar hyperemia is assessed for fanfilcon A lens (test). Grading Scale 0-4, 0=none, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe
Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
Bulbar Hyperemia - Enfilcon A Lens (Control)
Bulbar hyperemia is assessed for enfilcon A lens (control). Grading Scale 0-4, 0=none, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe
Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
Palpebral Conjunctiva - Fanfilcon A Lens (Test)
Palpebral conjunctiva is assessed for fanfilcon A lens (test). Grading scale: Absent/present
Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
Palpebral Conjunctiva - Enfilcon A Lens (Control)
Palpebral conjunctiva is assessed for enfilcon A lens (control). Grading scale: absent/present
Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
Visual Acuity - Fanfilcon A Lens (Test)
Visual acuity is assessed for fanfilcon A lens (test) using Snellen chart.
Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
Visual Acuity - Enfilcon A Lens (Control)
Visual acuity is assessed for enfilcon A lens (control) using Snellen chart.
Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
Average Wearing Time - Fanfilcon A Lens (Test)
Average lens wearing time for fanfilcon A lens (test) measured in hours.
Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
Average Wearing Time - Enfilcon A Lens (Control)
Average lens wearing time for enfilcon A lens (control) measured in hours.
Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Comfort - Fanfilcon A Lens (Test)
Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
Comfort - Enfilcon A Lens (Control)
Baseline, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months follow-up
Overall Vision Quality - Fanfilcon A Lens (Test)
Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
Overall Vision Quality - Enfilcon A Lens (Control)
Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
Ease of Insertion and Removal - Fanfilcon A Lens (Test)
Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
fanfilcon A (test)
EXPERIMENTALSubjects will be randomized to wear fanfilcon A lens (test) for one month of daily wear during the study.
enfilcon A (control)
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects will be randomized to wear enfilcon A lens (control) for one month of daily wear during the study.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Be at least 18 years of age as of the date of evaluation for the study.
- Have:
- Read the Informed Consent
- Been given an explanation of the Informed Consent
- Indicated understanding of the Informed Consent
- Signed the Informed Consent document.
- Be willing and able to adhere to the instructions set forth in this protocol and able to keep all specified appointments.
- Be an adapted, current full-time silicone hydrogel or soft contact lens wearer. An adapted full-time wearer is defined as wearing contact lenses at least 5 days per week for at least 8 hours per day for at least one month prior to participation in the study.
- Possess or obtain prior to dispensing, wearable and visually functional (20/40 or better) eyeglasses.
- Be in good general health, based on his/her knowledge.
- Require spectacle lens powers between -0.50 and -8.00 diopters sphere with no more than 1.50 diopter of refractive astigmatism and be willing to wear contact lenses in both eyes.
- Have manifest refraction Snellen visual acuities (VA) equal to or better than20/25 in each eye.
- To be eligible for lens dispensing, the subject must achieve 20/30 VA or better in each eye with the study lens and the investigator must judge the fit as acceptable or optimal.
You may not qualify if:
- Wearing lenses in a monovision modality and is unwilling to be fit with distance lenses in both eyes for the duration of the study. Note: Subjects may not wear lenses in a monovision modality at any time during the study as it will interfere with the visual acuity analysis.
- Poor personal hygiene.
- Any active participation in another clinical trial during this trial or within 30 days prior to this study.
- To the best of the subject's knowledge, she is currently pregnant, is lactating or is planning a pregnancy within the next 3 months.
- A member, relative or household member of the investigator or of the investigational office staff.
- Has a known sensitivity to the ingredients used in the Multi-Purpose Disinfection Lens Care System (MPS) approved for use in the study and is unable or unwilling to use the alternate care system.
- Previous refractive surgery; or current or previous orthokeratology treatment.
- Is aphakic or pseudophakic.
- Ocular or systemic disease such as, but not limited to: anterior uveitis or iritis (past or present), glaucoma, Sjögren's syndrome, lupus erythematosus, scleroderma, keratoconus or uncontrolled diabetes.
- The need for topical ocular medications or any systemic medication which might interfere with contact lens wear or require the lenses to be removed during the day.
- The presence of clinically significant (grade 2, 3 or 4) anterior segment abnormalities; or the presence of any inflammations such as iritis; or any infection of the eye, lids, or associated structures.
- A known history of corneal hypoesthesia (reduced corneal sensitivity), corneal ulcer, corneal infiltrates, iritis, bacterial or fungal infections.
- A history of papillary conjunctivitis that has interfered with contact lens wear.
- Slit lamp findings that would contraindicate contact lens wear, including but not limited to:
- Pathological dry eye or associated dry eye symptoms with decreased tear levels and punctuate staining \> Grade 2
- +6 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (6)
Eric White, O.D., Inc.
San Diego, California, 92123, United States
Mark Nakano, O.D.
Torrance, California, 90503, United States
Advanced Family Eye Care
Denver, North Carolina, 28037, United States
Quinn, Foster & Associates
Athens, Ohio, 45701, United States
Western Reserve Vision Care, Inc.
Beachwood, Ohio, 44122, United States
Primary Eyecare Group, P.C.
Brentwood, Tennessee, 37027-7552, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Senior Manager, Clinical Research
- Organization
- CooperVision Inc.
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Eric M White, OD
Eric White, O.D., Inc.
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Peter T Van Hoven, OD
Primary Eyecare Group, P.C.
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Amanda L Barker, OD
Advanced Family Eye Care
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mark E Nakano, OD
Mark Nakano, O.D.
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Thomas G Quinn, OD
Quinn, Foster & Associates
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mary Jo Stiegemeier, OD
Western Reserve Vision Care, Inc
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 16, 2015
First Posted
September 21, 2015
Study Start
September 21, 2015
Primary Completion
January 27, 2016
Study Completion
May 1, 2016
Last Updated
September 25, 2019
Results First Posted
March 8, 2017
Record last verified: 2019-09