Standard Care Versus Triventricular Pacing in Heart Failure
STRIVE HF
A Multicentre Randomised Control Trial Comparing Standard Cardiac Resynchronisation Pacing With Triventricular Pacing
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
100 pt multicentre study 50 pts randomised to triventricular pacemaker, 50 to biventricular pacemaker Feasibility study with 6 month outcome data
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3 heart-failure
Started Aug 2015
Shorter than P25 for phase_3 heart-failure
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 17, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 20, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2017
CompletedMarch 1, 2016
February 1, 2016
1.5 years
August 17, 2015
February 29, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Feasibility of achieving and maintaining triventricular pacing at 6 months
Percentage of patients having triventricular pacing at 6 months
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Proportion of patients who successfully reverse remodel as per echo (success being defined as a reduction in end systolic volume of > 15%
6 months
Proportionate effect of intervention and comparator with regard to reverse remodelling (comparison of % reduction in left ventricular end systolic volume )
6 months
Proportion of patients who successfully reverse remodel as per echo (success being defined as a reduction in end systolic volume of > 15% with prespecified subgroups (AF and aetiology)
6 months
Proportionate effect of intervention and comparator with regard to reverse remodelling (comparison of % reduction in left ventricular end systolic volume ) (AF and aetiology)
6 months
Mean change in Nt proBNP in patients with triventricular devices compared with biventricular devices (pg/ml)
6 months
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Triventricular pacing
EXPERIMENTAL2 Left ventricular leads and one right ventricular lead
Biventricular leads
ACTIVE COMPARATOR1 left ventricular lead and one right ventricular lead
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Class 1b Indication for CRT (LBBB QRS120-150ms) as per ESC guidelines 2013
- Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study.
- Male or Female, aged 18 years or above.
- Female participants of child bearing potential must be willing to ensure that they or their partner use effective contraception during the study and for 3 months thereafter
- Able (in the Investigators opinion) and willing to comply with all study requirements.
- Willing to allow his or her General Practitioner and consultant, if appropriate, to be notified of participation in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Female participant who is pregnant, lactating or planning pregnancy during the course of the study.
- Any other significant disease or disorder which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may either put the participants at risk because of participation in the study, or may influence the result of the study, or the participant's ability to participate in the study.
- Insufficient capacity to consent to the study
- QRS \>150ms and Non-LBBB morphology 120-150ms
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Guy's and St Thomas Hospital Trust
London, Se1 7EH, United Kingdom
Related Publications (1)
Gould J, Claridge S, Jackson T, Sieniewicz BJ, Sidhu BS, Porter B, Elliott MK, Mehta V, Niederer S, Chadwick H, Kamdar R, Adhya S, Patel N, Hamid S, Rogers D, Nicolson W, Chan CF, Whinnett Z, Murgatroyd F, Lambiase PD, Rinaldi CA. Standard care vs. TRIVEntricular pacing in Heart Failure (STRIVE HF): a prospective multicentre randomized controlled trial of triventricular pacing vs. conventional biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and intermediate QRS left bundle branch block. Europace. 2022 May 3;24(5):796-806. doi: 10.1093/europace/euab267.
PMID: 35079787DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 17, 2015
First Posted
August 20, 2015
Study Start
August 1, 2015
Primary Completion
February 1, 2017
Study Completion
August 1, 2017
Last Updated
March 1, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-02