Is MyPlate Approach to Helping Overweight Patients Lose Weight More Patient-centered?
Is MyPlate.Gov Approach to Helping Overweight Patients Lose Weight More Patient-centered?
1 other identifier
interventional
261
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Investigators from the University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA) and The Children's Clinic of Long Beach (TCC) are conducting a randomized, controlled comparative effectiveness trial of two government-sanctioned behavior change approaches to weight control with TCC's obese patients. The first approach is the calorie-counting calorie restriction (CC) approach used in the Diabetes Prevention Program. The second approach is the high-satiation/high-satiety approach represented by MyPlate.gov. The MyPlate nutritional goal is to double patient fruit and vegetable intake, legume intake, and whole grain intake. Both conditions stipulate 150 minutes of moderate physical activity a week. Study participants will be 300 of TCC's obese patients, 76% of whom are expected to be Latino, 13% African American and 11% Other Ethnicities. The interventions will be implemented by trained community lifestyle change coaches with brief support from clinicians. The interventions will include two home visits, two group education sessions and seven telephone behavior change coaching sessions. Compared to the CC approach, the MyPlate approach is hypothesized to yield better 12 months patient-centered outcomes, particularly self-reported satiety.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable obesity
Started Jul 2015
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 18, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 4, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 23, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 31, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 20, 2017
CompletedNovember 20, 2017
October 1, 2017
1.7 years
April 18, 2015
July 30, 2017
October 13, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Patient-centered Outcome Measure = Self-reported Hunger
Response to question: "Thinking about yesterday, how hungry did you feel during the day?" Response was a mark on a 100mm scale or oral response on a scale from 0 to 100 (for participants assessed via phone), 0="Not at all hungry" and 100="Extremely hungry."
12 months follow-up
Medical Outcome Measure = Body Weight
Body weight, measured in kilograms, was obtained by having shoeless participants dressed in light clothing stand on a regularly calibrated medical scale. Measures were taken twice. If these measures differed by more than 0.2 kg, a third measure was taken and averaged with the other two.
12 months follow-up
Meal Satisfaction Yesterday
"Take a moment to think about the last meal you ate yesterday. Thinking about the last meal you ate, how satisfied were you after the meal?" Response was a mark on a 100 mm visual analogue scale or response to oral question on a scale from 0 to 100 (for participants assessed via phone), with the low end (0) anchored by "Very satisfied" and the high end (100) anchored by "Very unsatisfied." For analysis purposes this measure was reverse-scored, so that higher values represented greater meal satisfaction.
12 months follow-up
Feeling Full After Last Meal Yesterday
"Take a moment to think about the last meal yesterday. Thinking about the last meal you ate, how full did you feel after that meal?" Response was a mark on a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS), or oral response to question on a scale from 0 to 100 (for participants assessed via phone), 0="Extremely full" and 100="Not at all full." For analysis purposes this measure was reverse-scored, so that higher values represented greater fullness.
12 months follow-up
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Systolic Blood Pressure
12 months follow-up
Body Mass Index
12 months follow-up
Waist Circumference
12 months follow-up
Study Arms (2)
Calorie-counting
ACTIVE COMPARATORIntervention protocol adapted from Diabetes Prevention Program lifestyle change intervention.
MyPlate
EXPERIMENTALIntervention protocol adapted from Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension dietary pattern.
Interventions
The Calorie Counting (CC) condition asks obese patients to achieve a daily calorie deficit. For average women consuming 2,000 calories at baseline, the target daily calorie total might be 1,600 calories. Participants are also asked to do at least 150 minutes of moderate to vigorous physical activity per week. Two community health workers will provide behavior change coaching to 150 TCC obese patients randomly assigned to the CC condition. The intervention protocol is adapted from the Diabetes Prevention Program. Behavior change strategies include: self-monitoring (e.g., calorie-counting, self-weighing), stimulus control, and relapse prevention strategies. The health coaching will occur during two home visits, two group health education sessions, and 7 telephone coaching calls.
The MyPlate approach asks Americans to limit daily calories but emphasizes eating MORE high-satiation foods by making ½ of daily food choices fruits and vegetables,¼ of daily food choices whole grains. All participants are asked to do at least 150 minutes of moderate to vigorous physical activity per week. Two community health workers will provide behavior change coaching to 150 TCC obese patients randomly assigned to the MyPlate condition. MyPlate is adapted from the DASH protocol. Behavior change strategies include: progressive goal-setting, stimulus control, and self-monitoring (e.g., % of food choices that are fruits \& vegetables). The health coaching will occur during two home visits, two group health education sessions, and 7 telephone behavior change coaching calls.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Must be overweight (BMI \> 25) or obese adult patient at The Childrens Clinic of Long Beach (TCC),
- interested in achieving desirable weight loss through behavior change.
- speak English or Spanish.
You may not qualify if:
- Smoking in last 6 months,
- Currently pregnant,
- Medical condition preventing voluntary change in food choices or level of daily physical activity,
- Planning on moving out of the Long Beach area in the next two years.
- MyocardiaI Infarction, stroke or atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease procedure within the last 6 months
- Serious medical condition likely to hinder accurate measurement of weight, or for which weight loss is contraindicated, or which would cause weight loss (e.g. End Stage Renal Disease on dialysis, cancer diagnosis or treatment within 2 yrs)
- Prior or planned bariatric surgery
- Use of prescription weight loss medication (including off label drugs e.g. topiramate, bupropion, byetta) or over-the-counter orlistat within 6 months
- Chronic use (at least past 6 months) of medications likely to cause weight gain or prevent weight loss (e.g. corticosteroids, lithium, olanzapine, risperidone, clozapine)
- Unintentional weight loss within past 6 months (≥ 5% of body weight)
- Intentional weight loss within past 6 months (≥ 5% of body weight)
- Pregnant or nursing within past 6 months
- Plans to become pregnant within 18 months
- Another member of household is a study participant or trial staff member
- Problem alcohol use: Self reported average consumption of \> 14 alcoholic drink per week or 5+ drinks on any occasion in past week? for males and \>7 drinks per week or 4+ drinks on any occasion in the past week for females
- +3 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
The Children's Clinic of Long Beach (TCC)
Long Beach, California, 90806, United States
UCLA Center for Cancer Prevention & Control Research
Los Angeles, California, 90095-6900, United States
Related Publications (1)
Gelberg L, Rico MW, Herman DR, Belin TR, Chandler M, Ramirez E, Love S, McCarthy WJ. Comparative effectiveness trial comparing MyPlate to calorie counting for mostly low-income Latino primary care patients of a federally qualified community health center: study design, baseline characteristics. BMC Public Health. 2019 Jul 24;19(1):990. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7294-z.
PMID: 31340800DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The original recruitment goal was N=300 but was reduced to N=261 because accrual took longer than expected. Statistical power was nonetheless expected to remain satisfactory for testing the main hypotheses.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- William J. McCarthy, Ph.D., Professor
- Organization
- UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, 650 Charles Young Drive, Los Angeles, CA 90095
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
William J McCarthy, Ph.D.
UCLA Fielding School of Public Health
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Adjunct Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 18, 2015
First Posted
August 4, 2015
Study Start
July 1, 2015
Primary Completion
March 23, 2017
Study Completion
July 31, 2017
Last Updated
November 20, 2017
Results First Posted
November 20, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, ICF
- Time Frame
- By 6/30/2018.
- Access Criteria
- UCLA IRB approval required.
The Fielding School of Public Health Open Data Portal is a web application being built that will enable the sharing of public health research, data and data tools. The platform operates in a secure, HIPPA compliant, cloud environment. The project's de-identified data, protocol and codebook will remain stored in an encrypted form. The portal was expressly designed to make new public health data available through a creative commons framework, available to any researcher willing to comply with UCLA IRB stipulations.