Deep Neuromuscular Blockade During Robotic Radical Prostatectomy
Effect of Deep Neuromuscular Blockade on Surgical Conditions and Recovery After Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: a Prospective Randomized Study
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Basic requirement for safe performance of the robotic intra-abdominal surgery is a calm and clear surgical field after the introduction of a capnoperitoneum. That can be enabled by a neuromuscular blockade. Provision of standard neuromuscular blockade is a compromise between optimal surgical conditions (sufficiently deep block) and capability to antagonize the block rapidly at the end of the surgery. With rocuronium, it is possible to maintain deep neuromuscular blockade safely until the very end of the surgery, and unlike with spontaneous recovery or reversal of the block with neostigmine, administration of sugammadex at the end of the surgery will enable quick and consistent reversal of the block. Project is focused on comparison of the parameters of deep and standard neuromuscular blockade - surgical conditions (primary endpoint), quality of recovery and turnover time (secondary endpoints).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Jul 2015
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 28, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 3, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2016
CompletedAugust 3, 2015
July 1, 2015
8 months
July 28, 2015
July 30, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Surgical condition
Surgical rating score (SRS) - surgical condition will be evaluated by surgeon every 15 minutes on predefined five point scale (excellent - above average - average - below average - poor). For each patient, the final score will be the average of all 15 min SRS values.
Every 15 minutes during surgery until final suture
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Quality of recovery
2 months
"Ready to leave operating room (OR)" time
Period of patient's presence at OR
Study Arms (2)
Standard Neuromuscular Blockade
EXPERIMENTALDrug: rocuronium + neostigmine Administration of rocuronium 0,6 mg/kg iv, top-ups 5-10 mg iv to target value of Train-of-Four (TOF) count = 1-2, TOF-count measurement every 1 min. Neuromuscular blockade reversal at the end of anesthesia: neostigmine 0.03 mg/kg iv + atropine 0.5-1.0 mg iv Induction of anesthesia: midazolam 1-2 mg iv, sufentanil 10-30 mcg iv, propofol 1.5-2.5 mg/kg iv Anesthesia: sevoflurane in air to target 1.2-1.5 minimal alveolar concentration (MAC). Rescue medication: sevoflurane, propofol 20-40 mg iv Extubation when patient is conscious and attained the recovery from neuromuscular blockade to a TOF-ratio of at least 0,9.
Deep Neuromuscular Blockade
EXPERIMENTALDrug: rocuronium + sugammadex Administration of rocuronium 0,6 mg/kg iv, top-ups 5-10 mg iv to target value of Post-tetanic Count (PTC) = 1-2; PTC measurement every 4 min. Neuromuscular blockade reversal at the end of anesthesia: sugammadex 2 mg/kg iv (when PTC is 18-20 and TOF-count 0) or sugammadex 4 mg/kg iv (when PTC under 18). Induction of anesthesia: midazolam 1-2 mg iv, sufentanil 10-30 mcg iv, propofol 1,5-2,5 mg/kg iv Anesthesia: sevoflurane in air to target 1.2-1.5 minimal alveolar concentration (MAC). Rescue medication: sevoflurane, propofol 20-40 mg iv. Extubation when patient is conscious and attained recovery from neuromuscular blockade to a TOF-ratio of at least 0,9.
Interventions
Standard neuromuscular block provided by rocuronium to TOF-count 1-2. Reversal of the block with neostigmine.
Deep neuromuscular block provided by rocuronium to PTC 1-2. Reversal of the block with sugammadex.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age over 18 years
- Informed consent
- Elective robotic radical prostatectomy
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status 1-3
You may not qualify if:
- Age under 18 years
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status over 3
- Indication for rapid sequence induction, signs of difficult airway severe neuromuscular, liver or renal disease
- Known allergy to drugs used in the study
- Malignant hyperthermia (medical history)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Palacky Universitylead
- University Hospital Olomouccollaborator
- Masaryk Hospital Usti nad Labemcollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Dept. of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Olomouc
Olomouc, 775 20, Czechia
Dept. of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care, J. E. Purkinje University, Masaryk Hospital
Ústí nad Labem, 401 13, Czechia
Related Publications (14)
Lindekaer AL, Halvor Springborg H, Istre O. Deep neuromuscular blockade leads to a larger intraabdominal volume during laparoscopy. J Vis Exp. 2013 Jun 25;(76):50045. doi: 10.3791/50045.
PMID: 23851450RESULTStaehr-Rye AK, Rasmussen LS, Rosenberg J, Juul P, Gatke MR. Optimized surgical space during low-pressure laparoscopy with deep neuromuscular blockade. Dan Med J. 2013 Feb;60(2):A4579.
PMID: 23461992RESULTBoon M, Martini CH, Aarts LP, Bevers RF, Dahan A. Effect of variations in depth of neuromuscular blockade on rating of surgical conditions by surgeon and anesthesiologist in patients undergoing laparoscopic renal or prostatic surgery (BLISS trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2013 Mar 1;14:63. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-63.
PMID: 23452344RESULTDing L, Zhang H, Mi W, Sun L, Zhang X, Ma X, Li H. [Effects of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum and steep Trendelenburg positioning on cerebral blood backflow during robotic radical prostatectomy]. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2015 May;35(5):712-5. Chinese.
PMID: 26018268RESULTDing L, Zhang H, Mi W, He Y, Zhang X, Ma X, Li H. [Effects of dexmedetomidine on recovery period of anesthesia and postoperative cognitive function after robot-assisted laparoscopicradical prostatectomy in the elderly people]. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2015 Feb;40(2):129-35. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2015.02.003. Chinese.
PMID: 25769330RESULTDogra PN, Saini AK, Singh P, Bora G, Nayak B. Extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Initial experience. Urol Ann. 2014 Apr;6(2):130-4. doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.130555.
PMID: 24833824RESULTKopman AF, Naguib M. Laparoscopic surgery and muscle relaxants: is deep block helpful? Anesth Analg. 2015 Jan;120(1):51-58. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000471.
PMID: 25625254RESULTDonati F, Brull SJ. More muscle relaxation does not necessarily mean better surgeons or "the problem of muscle relaxation in surgery". Anesth Analg. 2014 Nov;119(5):1019-21. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000429. No abstract available.
PMID: 25329018RESULTMartini CH, Boon M, Bevers RF, Aarts LP, Dahan A. Evaluation of surgical conditions during laparoscopic surgery in patients with moderate vs deep neuromuscular block. Br J Anaesth. 2014 Mar;112(3):498-505. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet377. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
PMID: 24240315RESULTStaehr-Rye AK, Rasmussen LS, Rosenberg J, Juul P, Lindekaer AL, Riber C, Gatke MR. Surgical space conditions during low-pressure laparoscopic cholecystectomy with deep versus moderate neuromuscular blockade: a randomized clinical study. Anesth Analg. 2014 Nov;119(5):1084-92. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000316.
PMID: 24977638RESULTDubois PE, Putz L, Jamart J, Marotta ML, Gourdin M, Donnez O. Deep neuromuscular block improves surgical conditions during laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2014 Aug;31(8):430-6. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000094.
PMID: 24809482RESULTVijayaraghavan N, Sistla SC, Kundra P, Ananthanarayan PH, Karthikeyan VS, Ali SM, Sasi SP, Vikram K. Comparison of standard-pressure and low-pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a double blinded randomized controlled study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2014 Apr;24(2):127-33. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182937980.
PMID: 24686347RESULTGurusamy KS, Vaughan J, Davidson BR. Low pressure versus standard pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Mar 18;2014(3):CD006930. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006930.pub3.
PMID: 24639018RESULTRoyse CF, Newman S, Chung F, Stygall J, McKay RE, Boldt J, Servin FS, Hurtado I, Hannallah R, Yu B, Wilkinson DJ. Development and feasibility of a scale to assess postoperative recovery: the post-operative quality recovery scale. Anesthesiology. 2010 Oct;113(4):892-905. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181d960a9.
PMID: 20601860RESULT
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Milan Adamus, MD,PhD,MBA
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine Palacky University Olomouc Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Vladimir Cerny, MD,PhD,FCCM
J. E. Purkinje University, Masaryk Hospital, Usti nad Labem, Czech Republic, Dept. of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Milan Adamus, MD, PhD, MBA
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 28, 2015
First Posted
August 3, 2015
Study Start
July 1, 2015
Primary Completion
March 1, 2016
Study Completion
March 1, 2016
Last Updated
August 3, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-07