NCT02794714

Brief Summary

This study compares surgeon's satisfaction of operating conditions and patient's satisfaction following laparoscopic gynecological surgeries in two groups of patients, half of whom will receive deep neuromuscular blockade and the other half, moderate neuromuscular blockade.

Trial Health

15
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2016

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 19, 2016

Completed
13 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2016

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 9, 2016

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

October 4, 2018

Status Verified

October 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

May 19, 2016

Last Update Submit

October 2, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgeries

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Deep block versus Moderate block: Impact on surgical satisfaction

    The surgeon will be required to score the quality of operating conditions every 15 minutes from 1st visualisation of peritoneal cavity until the removal of laparoscopes at the end of surgery.

    Every 15 minutes from first laparoscopic view till the removal of laparoscopes at the end of surgery or up to 8 hours from 1st score.

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Deep block versus Moderate block: Patient satisfaction score

    Post Anesthetic Recovery Score done at half hour from time of arrival at PACU and patient deemed fit for discharge up to 2 hours from time of arrival at PACU

  • Deep block versus Moderate block: Pain score

    Post Anesthetic Recovery Score done at half hour from time of arrival at PACU and patient deemed fit for discharge up to 2 hours from time of arrival at PACU

  • Deep block versus Moderate block: PONV Score

    Post Anesthetic Recovery Score done at half hour from time of arrival at PACU and patient deemed fit for discharge up to 2 hours from time of arrival at PACU

Study Arms (2)

deep neuromuscular blockade

EXPERIMENTAL

Rocuronium will be administered to achieve PTC 1-2 throughout surgery.

Drug: Moderate neuromuscular blockade

moderate neuromuscular blockade

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Rocuronium will be administered to achieve TOFC 2 throughout surgery

Drug: Deep neuromuscular blockade

Interventions

Deep neuromuscular blockade attained during surgery using Rocuronium 0.6mg/kg at induction of anesthesia with intermittent boluses of 0.15 - 0.2 mg/kg to maintain a Post Tetanic Count (PTC) of 1-2 throughout surgery. Neuromuscular blockade reversed at the end of surgery with Sugammadex 4mg/kg.

Also known as: Rocuronium, Esmeron
moderate neuromuscular blockade

Moderate neuromuscular blockade attained during surgery using Rocuronium 0.6mg/kg at induction with intermittent boluses of 0.15 - 0.2 mg/kg to maintain Train of Four Count (TOFC) of 2 throughout surgery. Neuromuscular blockade reversed at the end of surgery with Sugammadex 2mg/kg.

Also known as: Rocuronium, Esmeron
deep neuromuscular blockade

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 64 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients identified from the anaesthetic clinic scheduled to undergo a laparoscopic gynaecological procedure under general anaesthesia
  • requiring tracheal intubation
  • elective surgeries (eg. laparoscopy \& dye insufflation, bilateral tubal ligation, cystectomy, myomectomy, hysterectomy, salpingo-oophorectomy)
  • American Society of Anaesthesiology (ASA) I-II

You may not qualify if:

  • Anticipated difficult airway
  • Patients requiring rapid sequence induction
  • Patient anticipated to require admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) or not planned for extubation
  • Patient with liver or renal failure (creatinine clearance \<50mls/min)
  • Patients with a baseline heart rate \<50/min
  • Patients with documented or suspected neuromuscular disorder
  • Guillain - Barre syndrome
  • Cerebrovascular accidents with residual neurology
  • Parkinson's Disease
  • Myasthenia Gravis
  • Any condition making the administration of patient satisfaction questionnaire difficult/impossible
  • speech or hearing impairment and language barriers
  • Patients on fusidic acid or toremifene 24 hours before surgery
  • Patients on hormonal contraceptives; oral or otherwise
  • Patients on drugs, medical problems that may prolong or shorten the duration of rocuronium- (eg.. aminoglycosides, magnesium)
  • +1 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (15)

  • Song D, Joshi GP, White PF. Fast-track eligibility after ambulatory anesthesia: a comparison of desflurane, sevoflurane, and propofol. Anesth Analg. 1998 Feb;86(2):267-73. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199802000-00009.

    PMID: 9459231BACKGROUND
  • Gupta A, Stierer T, Zuckerman R, Sakima N, Parker SD, Fleisher LA. Comparison of recovery profile after ambulatory anesthesia with propofol, isoflurane, sevoflurane and desflurane: a systematic review. Anesth Analg. 2004 Mar;98(3):632-41, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000103187.70627.57.

    PMID: 14980911BACKGROUND
  • Fearon KC, Ljungqvist O, Von Meyenfeldt M, Revhaug A, Dejong CH, Lassen K, Nygren J, Hausel J, Soop M, Andersen J, Kehlet H. Enhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection. Clin Nutr. 2005 Jun;24(3):466-77. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2005.02.002. Epub 2005 Apr 21.

    PMID: 15896435BACKGROUND
  • Martini CH, Boon M, Bevers RF, Aarts LP, Dahan A. Evaluation of surgical conditions during laparoscopic surgery in patients with moderate vs deep neuromuscular block. Br J Anaesth. 2014 Mar;112(3):498-505. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet377. Epub 2013 Nov 15.

    PMID: 24240315BACKGROUND
  • Dubois PE, Putz L, Jamart J, Marotta ML, Gourdin M, Donnez O. Deep neuromuscular block improves surgical conditions during laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2014 Aug;31(8):430-6. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000094.

    PMID: 24809482BACKGROUND
  • Geldner G, Niskanen M, Laurila P, Mizikov V, Hubler M, Beck G, Rietbergen H, Nicolayenko E. A randomised controlled trial comparing sugammadex and neostigmine at different depths of neuromuscular blockade in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. Anaesthesia. 2012 Sep;67(9):991-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07197.x. Epub 2012 Jun 14.

    PMID: 22698066BACKGROUND
  • Woo T, Kim KS, Shim YH, Kim MK, Yoon SM, Lim YJ, Yang HS, Phiri P, Chon JY. Sugammadex versus neostigmine reversal of moderate rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade in Korean patients. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2013 Dec;65(6):501-7. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2013.65.6.501. Epub 2013 Dec 26.

    PMID: 24427455BACKGROUND
  • Carron M, Veronese S, Foletto M, Ori C. Sugammadex allows fast-track bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2013 Oct;23(10):1558-63. doi: 10.1007/s11695-013-0926-y.

    PMID: 23519634BACKGROUND
  • Jones RK, Caldwell JE, Brull SJ, Soto RG. Reversal of profound rocuronium-induced blockade with sugammadex: a randomized comparison with neostigmine. Anesthesiology. 2008 Nov;109(5):816-24. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31818a3fee.

    PMID: 18946293BACKGROUND
  • Della Rocca G, Pompei L, Pagan DE Paganis C, Tesoro S, Mendola C, Boninsegni P, Tempia A, Manstretta S, Zamidei L, Gratarola A, Murabito P, Fuggiano L, DI Marco P. Reversal of rocuronium induced neuromuscular block with sugammadex or neostigmine: a large observational study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2013 Oct;57(9):1138-45. doi: 10.1111/aas.12155. Epub 2013 Jul 14.

    PMID: 23849107BACKGROUND
  • Gaszynski T, Szewczyk T, Gaszynski W. Randomized comparison of sugammadex and neostigmine for reversal of rocuronium-induced muscle relaxation in morbidly obese undergoing general anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2012 Feb;108(2):236-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer330. Epub 2011 Oct 19.

    PMID: 22012861BACKGROUND
  • Murphy GS, Szokol JW, Avram MJ, Greenberg SB, Marymont JH, Vender JS, Gray J, Landry E, Gupta DK. Intraoperative acceleromyography monitoring reduces symptoms of muscle weakness and improves quality of recovery in the early postoperative period. Anesthesiology. 2011 Nov;115(5):946-54. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182342840.

    PMID: 21946094BACKGROUND
  • Murphy GS, Szokol JW, Avram MJ, Greenberg SB, Shear T, Vender JS, Gray J, Landry E. Postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade is associated with impaired clinical recovery. Anesth Analg. 2013 Jul;117(1):133-41. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182742e75. Epub 2013 Jan 21.

    PMID: 23337416BACKGROUND
  • Apfel CC, Roewer N, Korttila K. How to study postoperative nausea and vomiting. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2002 Sep;46(8):921-8. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2002.460801.x.

    PMID: 12190791BACKGROUND
  • White H, Black RJ, Jones M, Mar Fan GC. Randomized comparison of two anti-emetic strategies in high-risk patients undergoing day-case gynaecological surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2007 Apr;98(4):470-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/aem001. Epub 2007 Feb 22.

    PMID: 17317757BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Rocuronium

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AndrostanolsAndrostanesSteroidsFused-Ring CompoundsPolycyclic Compounds

Study Officials

  • Vanitha Sivanaser, M.Med Anaes (UM)

    Kuala Lumpur General Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
0

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Dr

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 19, 2016

First Posted

June 9, 2016

Study Start

June 1, 2016

Primary Completion

December 1, 2017

Study Completion

December 1, 2017

Last Updated

October 4, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-10