Bifrontal and Bitemporal Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) in Treatment of Patients With Schizophrenia
ESBECT
Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of the Bifrontal Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) and the Standard Bitemporal ECT in the Treatment of Patients With Schizophrenia
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Electroconvulsive therapy has been used in clinical practice since 1938, a number of randomized trials found significant differences favoring ECT in response rates between individuals with depression receiving real and sham ECT. Results of early studies performed on patients with schizophrenia weren't so clear, only few of these trials found appreciable differences between real and sham ECT in clinical outcome. The recent, more reliable studies have found that ECT is efficacious on different symptoms which might be present in the course of schizophrenia, for example, psychotic and affective ones, as well as suicidality. The serious complications of electroconvulsive therapy are rare, however, more frequent side effects may include cognitive impairment and postictal delirium. Thus, the researchers try to develop new, more effective and less harmful procedures of ECT, like bifrontal electrodes. The available studies revealed that bifrontal ECT has equal efficacy to bitemporal ECT with less cognitive impairment, but the literature examining this placement is limited to major depressive disorder and the results are inconsistent. In the worldwide literature there is lack of studies regarding the use of bifrontal ECT among patients with schizophrenia. It is interesting how bifrontal ECT would affect axial symptoms of schizophrenia, since the electrodes in this procedure are placed over the brain areas responsible for negative symptoms. This randomized, double blind study is going to assess whether the bifrontal ECT is more effective in the treatment of positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia, has less harmful impact on the cognitive functions and decrease the frequency and severity of postictal delirium comparing to the bitemporal ECT. Moreover, as the first worldwide will assess the brain dopaminergic activity with the use of PET in the patients with schizophrenia after ECT and the impact of the ECT on the concentration of such neurotrophins as brain-derived neurotrophic factor-BDNF, neuron specific enolase-NSE and protein S100B.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable schizophrenia
Started Sep 2015
Typical duration for not_applicable schizophrenia
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 9, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 30, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2019
CompletedOctober 3, 2016
September 1, 2016
2.8 years
July 9, 2015
September 29, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (11)
Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale
Assessment conducted on baseline, after 6th, 12th and the last ECT.
up to 5 weeks
Clinical Global Impression
Assessment conducted on baseline, after 6th, 12th and the last ECT.
up to 5 weeks
Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale
Assessment conducted after the each ECT course.
up to 5 weeks
Confusion Assessment Method
Assessment conducted after the each ECT course.
up to 5 weeks
Verbal Memory Test
Assessment conducted on baseline, after the 6th ECT and one week after the last ECT (24 hours after each ECT course).
up to 5 weeks
Visual Memory Test
Assessment conducted on baseline, after the 6th ECT and one week after the last ECT (24 hours after each ECT course).
up to 5 weeks
Finger Tapping Test
Assessment conducted on baseline, after the 6th ECT and one week after the last ECT (24 hours after each ECT course)
up to 5 weeks
Symbol Digit Coding Test
Assessment conducted on baseline, after the 6th ECT and one week after the last ECT (24 hours after each ECT course)
up to 5 weeks
Stroop Test
Assessment conducted on baseline, after the 6th ECT and one week after the last ECT (24 hours after each ECT course)
up to 5 weeks
Shifting Attention Test
Assessment conducted on baseline, after the 6th ECT and one week after the last ECT (24 hours after each ECT course)
up to 5 weeks
Continuous Performance Test
Assessment conducted on baseline, after the 6th ECT and one week after the last ECT (24 hours after each ECT course).
up to 5 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Positron Emission Tomography to assess the impact of ECT on the dopaminergic system activity
up to 5 weeks
The concentration of brain-derived neurotrophic factor.
up to 5 weeks
The concentration of neuron specific enolase.
up to 5 weeks
The concentration of protein S100B
up to 5 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Bifrontal electroconvulsive therapy
EXPERIMENTALThe ECT courses will be held twice or three times a week. There is no stated minimal nor maximal number of ECT courses. If there is no improvement after 12 courses, the ECT will be regarded as ineffective.
Bitemporal electroconvulsive therapy
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe ECT courses will be held twice or three times a week. There is no stated minimal nor maximal number of ECT courses. If there is no improvement after 12 courses, the ECT will be regarded as ineffective.
Interventions
The centre of each electrode will be placed 4-5 cm above the outer canthus of the eye along a vertical line perpendicular to a line connecting the pupils.
The centre of the stimulus electrodes will be applied 2-3 cm above the midpoint of the line connecting the outer canthus of the eye and the external auditory meatus on each side of the individual's head.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The patients who met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-DSM-V criteria for schizophrenia (apart from residual type)
- The patients qualified for ECT according the standard protocol
- Antipsychotic treatment with dibenzepins according to the following scheme: the dose of clozapine not higher than 450mg, the dose of olanzapine not higher than 20mg and the dose of quetiapine not higher than 600mg per day
- If needed concomitant treatment allowed with hydroxyzine (max. 100mg per day) and lorazepam (max. 4mg per day)
- Anaesthesia conducted with the use of suxamethonium chloride, propofol and atropine
You may not qualify if:
- The lack of patient's consent
- Mental retardation confirmed with the psychological and psychiatric examination (IQ\<70; fulfilled DSM-V criteria for mental retardation)
- Dementia diagnosed on the basis of DSM-V criteria
- Substance abuse during the year prior study enrolment or substance addiction
- The presence of symptoms which met DSM-V criteria for affective episode (an episode of mania, hypomania or depression)
- The ECT conducted during 6 months prior the study enrolment
- The history of previous ineffective ECT
- The need for antipsychotic treatment other than derivatives of dibenzothiazepines or in doses higher than 450mg of clozapine, 20mg of olanzapine and 600mg of quetiapine per day
- The women in the generative period who do not use effective contraception (sexual abstinence, contraceptives, intrauterine device, mechanical contraceptive devices)
- The need for use of other than suxamethonium chloride, propofol and atropine anaesthetics and concomitant medications
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Old Age Psychiatry and Psychotic Disorders Medical University of Lodz
Lodz, 92-213, Poland
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Iwona Kloszewska, Prof.
Medical University of Lodz, Poland
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 9, 2015
First Posted
July 30, 2015
Study Start
September 1, 2015
Primary Completion
July 1, 2018
Study Completion
July 1, 2019
Last Updated
October 3, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-09