Checklists and Upright Positioning in Endotracheal Intubation of Critically Ill Patients (Check-UP) Trial
Check-UP
1 other identifier
interventional
260
1 country
5
Brief Summary
The use of a written, pre-procedure checklist and positioning the patient with the head of the bed elevated have been proposed as interventions capable of preventing complications during non-elective intubation and are used intermittently in routine care -- however neither have been examined in a prospective trial.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Jul 2015
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 6, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 14, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2016
CompletedSeptember 19, 2016
September 1, 2016
1.2 years
July 6, 2015
September 16, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Lowest Arterial Oxygen Saturation (Both positioning and Checklist interventions)
Lowest non-invasively measured arterial oxygen saturation between the time of induction or neuromuscular blockade and two minutes after completion of the airway management procedure
Time of Induction through 2 minutes after successful intubation
Lowest Systolic Blood Pressure (Checklist intervention only)
Lowest non-invasively or invasively measured systolic blood pressure between medication administration and 2 minutes following successful placement of an endotracheal tube (in checklist comparison only)
Time of Induction through 2 minutes after successful intubation
Secondary Outcomes (14)
Incidence of Desaturation
Time of Induction through 2 minutes after successful intubation
Incidence of Hypoxemia
Time of Induction through 2 minutes after successful intubation
Change in Saturation
Time of Induction through 2 minutes after successful intubation
Grade of First Glottic View
Time of Induction through 2 minutes after successful intubation
First Pass Success
Time of Induction through 2 minutes after successful intubation
- +9 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
Sniffing Position, No Checklist
NO INTERVENTIONPatient in the sniffing position without the use of a written checklist
Sniffing Position, Checklist
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatient in the sniffing position with the use of a written checklist
Head of Bed Up, No Checklist
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatient with the head of bed up and without the use of a checklist
Head of Bed Up, Checklist
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatient with the head of bed up and with the use of a checklist
Interventions
Use of a written checklist pre and peri-intubation
Raising the patient's head of bed to 25 degrees
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Airway management events will be included in which:
- Patient is admitted to the Medical Intensive Care Unit (MICU)
- Planned procedure is endotracheal intubation
- Planned operator is a Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine (PCCM) fellow
- Administration of sedation and/or neuromuscular blockade is planned
- Age ≥ 18 years old
You may not qualify if:
- Airway management events will be excluded in which:
- Operator feels specific patient positioning during intubation is required
- Urgency of intubation precludes safe performance of study procedures
- Operator feels an alternative pre-procedure checklist or no checklist is required
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (5)
University of Alabama - Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294, United States
Louisiana State University School of Medicine
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112, United States
Ochsner Medical Center
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70115, United States
Vanderbilt University
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232, United States
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, 98104, United States
Related Publications (2)
Janz DR, Semler MW, Joffe AM, Casey JD, Lentz RJ, deBoisblanc BP, Khan YA, Santanilla JI, Bentov I, Rice TW; Check-UP Investigators*; Pragmatic Critical Care Research Group. A Multicenter Randomized Trial of a Checklist for Endotracheal Intubation of Critically Ill Adults. Chest. 2018 Apr;153(4):816-824. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.08.1163. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
PMID: 28917549DERIVEDSemler MW, Janz DR, Russell DW, Casey JD, Lentz RJ, Zouk AN, deBoisblanc BP, Santanilla JI, Khan YA, Joffe AM, Stigler WS, Rice TW; Check-UP Investigators( *); Pragmatic Critical Care Research Group. A Multicenter, Randomized Trial of Ramped Position vs Sniffing Position During Endotracheal Intubation of Critically Ill Adults. Chest. 2017 Oct;152(4):712-722. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.03.061. Epub 2017 May 6.
PMID: 28487139DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Todd W Rice, MD, MSc
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor of Medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 6, 2015
First Posted
July 14, 2015
Study Start
July 1, 2015
Primary Completion
September 1, 2016
Study Completion
September 1, 2016
Last Updated
September 19, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-09