NCT02490436

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the EGFR-inhibitor cetuximab is better than placebo for the treatment of neuropathic pain.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
15

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2015

Shorter than P25 for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 5, 2015

Completed
28 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 3, 2015

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2015

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

November 8, 2016

Status Verified

November 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

June 5, 2015

Last Update Submit

November 7, 2016

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in average neuropathic pain score using an 11-point numeric rating scale.

    Days 4-8 after each infusion of cetuximab and placebo

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • Comparison of frequency, in all patients on active treatment of at least a 30% reduction of average neuropathic pain score using an 11-point numeric rating scale.

    Days 4-8 after each infusion of cetuximab and placebo

  • Comparison of frequency in all patients on active treatment of at least a 50% reduction of average neuropathic pain score using an 11-point numeric rating scale.

    Days 4-8 after each infusion of cetuximab and placebo

  • Comparison of change in average worst neuropathic pain score using an 11-point numeric rating scale.

    Days 4-8 after each infusion of cetuximab and placebo

  • Comparison of frequency, in all patients on active treatment of at least a 30% reduction of average worst neuropathic pain score using an 11-point numeric rating scale.

    Days 4-8 after each infusion of cetuximab and placebo

  • Comparison of frequency in all patients on active treatment of at least a 50% reduction of average worst neuropathic pain score using an 11-point numeric rating scale.

    Days 4-8 after each infusion of cetuximab and placebo

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

A: active drug first

EXPERIMENTAL

Cetuximab in treatment period 1, placebo in treatment period 2, and open-label cetuximab in treatment period 3.

Drug: CetuximabDrug: Placebo

B: placebo first

EXPERIMENTAL

Placebo in treatment period 1, cetuximab in treatment period 2, and open-label cetuximab in treatment period 3.

Drug: CetuximabDrug: Placebo

Interventions

Randomized cross-over between cetuximab and placebo

Also known as: Erbitux
A: active drug firstB: placebo first

Randomized cross-over between cetuximab and placebo

A: active drug firstB: placebo first

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Signed informed consent and anticipated compliance.
  • Pain defined as "definite" neuropathic pain, according to the Special Interest Group on Neuropathic Pain guidelines or defined as "probable" NP, according to the guidelines, if the confirmatory test was a positive diagnostic test. Complex regional pain syndrome can be included despite lack of an offending lesion, as long as the "Budapest criteria" are fulfilled
  • Neuropathic Pain associated with compressive nerve states (including failed surgery) or CRPS (according to the "Budapest criteria")
  • PainDETECT score of at least 13 with average pain intensity of at least 6 /10 over the last four weeks. In addition, a painDETECT pattern indicating that the underlying neuropathic pain is constantly present.
  • Worst pain intensity higher than 6 for five of seven days during the screening phase, according to Brif Pain Inventory.
  • The patient should be able to distinguish between the neuropathic pain and other pain conditions, including elements of nociceptive pain caused by the same disease process.
  • Neuropathic pain duration of between six and thirty months, deemed chronic and likely to be irreversible by clinical history and findings.
  • No new or increased neuropathic pain treatment for the last four weeks.
  • Standard medical treatments for the patients' underlying condition or neuropathic pain must have been considered or tried and must, according to the opinion of the referring or a consulted pain specialist, be judged to be inappropriate or of insufficient potential efficacy.
  • Referring physician agreement to follow up the patient after study completion according to the best possible and available pain treatment and care.
  • Women of childbearing potential and men must use an acceptable method of contraception throughout the study, and for 30 days after the last study drug administration.
  • Negative pregnancy test within 7 days before each treatment period where appropriate.
  • Aged 18 or above

You may not qualify if:

  • Neuropathic pain origin in the central nervous system.
  • Phantom limb pain or a significant component of nociceptive pain.
  • Ascending distal small fiber peripheral neuropathy.
  • Patients primarily experiencing pain 'attacks', i.e. pattern of neuropathic pain depicted in picture 3 of the painDETECT.
  • Other pain state that may interfere with evaluation of the studied neuropathic pain condition.
  • Any underlying medical or psychiatric condition, clinical disorder or laboratory finding, which in the opinion of the investigator may interfere with study objectives.
  • Uncontrolled or unstable diabetes.
  • Severe or uncontrolled cardiovascular disease (congestive heart failure NYHA III or IV), unstable angina pectoris, history of myocardial infarction within the last twelve months, significant arrhythmias
  • Active and ongoing eye and skin disorders or newly diagnosed gastric ulcer that may interfere with the study treatment.
  • History of allergic reaction to any of the study treatment components, red meat or tick bites.
  • Previous treatment with any EGFR-pathway inhibitor.
  • Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding.
  • Participation in another clinical trial within the past 90 days.
  • Use of any investigational agent within 90 days prior to day 1 of study drug.
  • Known drug abuse/alcohol abuse, legal incapacity or limited legal capacity or any other reason that, in the opinion of the investigator precludes the subject from participating.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Center for Cancer Treatment, Sorlandet Hospital HF

Kristiansand, 4604, Norway

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Kersten C, Cameron MG, Bailey AG, Fallon MT, Laird BJ, Paterson V, Mitchell R, Fleetwood-Walker SM, Daly F, Mjaland S. Relief of Neuropathic Pain Through Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibition: A Randomized Proof-of-Concept Trial. Pain Med. 2019 Dec 1;20(12):2495-2505. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz101.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

NeuralgiaComplex Regional Pain Syndromes

Interventions

Cetuximab

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Peripheral Nervous System DiseasesNeuromuscular DiseasesNervous System DiseasesPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsAutonomic Nervous System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodiesImmunoglobulinsImmunoproteinsBlood ProteinsProteinsAmino Acids, Peptides, and ProteinsSerum GlobulinsGlobulins

Study Officials

  • Christian Kersten, MD PhD

    Center for Cancer Treatment, Sørlandet Hospital, Kristiansand

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 5, 2015

First Posted

July 3, 2015

Study Start

October 1, 2015

Primary Completion

October 1, 2016

Study Completion

October 1, 2016

Last Updated

November 8, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-11

Locations