NCT01485094

Brief Summary

The purpose of this trial is to determine whether a novel analgesic is effective in treating of neuropathic pain caused by herpetic infection, surgery, or trauma.

Trial Health

60
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
114

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2012

Shorter than P25 for phase_2

Geographic Reach
4 countries

12 active sites

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 5, 2011

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 5, 2011

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2012

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2013

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2013

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

October 2, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

October 28, 2019

Status Verified

October 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

October 5, 2011

Results QC Date

September 16, 2014

Last Update Submit

October 14, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

neuralgiapostherpetic

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Difference Between Baseline and End-of-double-blind Treatment Ongoing Pain Intensity Scores

    The baseline pain intensity score was calculated as a mean of pain intensity scores during the Baseline Period (from Day -3 to Day -1). The ongoing pain intensity data from Day-3 to Day 7 was used. For the analysis, only pain scores on days where participants received study drug were considered. The primary efficacy analysis of the ongoing pain intensity score were analyzed in a Bayesian framework, via a mono exponential decay model, with the baseline Numeric Rating Score (NRS) as intercept. Considering the inclusion criteria of baseline pain intensity being in the range from 4 to 9, the range in ongoing pain intensity difference between baseline and end-of-double-blind treatment can be from 6 (worst possible value) to -9 (best possible value). A negative value indicates improvement whilst on the treatment.

    Baseline; Day 7 (end of double blind treatment)

  • The Difference Between Baseline and End-of-double-blind Treatment Brush-evoked Pain Intensity Scores

    The difference between baseline and end-of-double-blind treatment brush-evoked pain intensity scores compared to placebo on a 0-100 point NRS (measured as part of the dynamic mechanical allodynia assessments). Each participant rated each brush-evoked pain intensity on a 0 to 100 point Numerical Pain Rating Scale, with 0 indicating 'No Pain' and 100 indicating 'most intense pain imaginable'. Lower values compared to an individual subject's baseline are an improvement in symptoms. The baseline brush-evoked pain intensity score was defined as the average of the geometric mean of all of the values obtained on Day -2 and Day -1, and compared with the scores obtained on day 6 and 7. For the analysis, only pain scores on days where participants received study drug were considered. A negative change indicates a decrease in brush-evoked pain intensity from baseline.

    Baseline and day 7 (end of double blind treatment)

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • Assessment of Responder Rates

    Day 7 (end of double blind treatment)

  • Onset of Current Pain Relief

    Day 1 to Day 7 (end of double blind treatment)

  • Onset of Ongoing Pain Relief

    Day 1 to Day 7 (end of double blind treatment)

  • Change in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory Scores on Day 7 From Baseline (Day -1)

    Day -1; Day 7 (end of double blind treatment)

  • Difference in Patient's Global Impression of Change

    Day 7 (end of double blind treatment)

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Matching placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Oral administration. Pain not sufficiently controlled may be treated with acetaminophen.

Drug: Matching Placebo

GRT6010

EXPERIMENTAL

Oral administration. Pain not sufficiently controlled may be treated with acetaminophen.

Drug: GRT6010

Pregabalin

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Oral administration. Pain not sufficiently controlled may be treated with acetaminophen.

Drug: Pregabalin

Interventions

Oral solution given once daily.

GRT6010

Over-encapsulated pregabalin capsules 75mg twice daily on Days 1 to 3, and 150mg twice daily on Days 4 to 7.

Also known as: Lyrica®
Pregabalin

Matching Placebo capsules to the over-encapsulated Pregabalin capsules and Matching Placebo oral solution to the GRT6010 solution. Capsules twice daily on Days 1 to 7. Solution once daily.

Matching placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 18 years to 75 years
  • Presence of persistent neuropathic pain for at least 6 months at the time of the Enrollment Visit. Allowed reasons for neuropathic pain are: modified radical mastectomy, breast conserving surgery, or cosmetic breast surgery. \[Germany: subjects after cosmetic breast surgery may not be enrolled.\]
  • Presence of "probable" or "definite" neuropathic pain.
  • Presence of dynamic mechanical allodynia on the affected side, or alternatively, the mechanical pain sensitivity for any of the pinprick stimuli is higher on the affected compared to the contralateral side.
  • At either Visit 5 or Visit 6: Presence of an average evoked pain intensity score of \>20 on the 0 100 point numeric rating scale (NRS) for at least 1 of the 3 clinical sub-tests for dynamic mechanical allodynia (i.e., standardized brush, cotton wool tip or cotton wisp). The average will be calculated as the arithmetic mean of all measurements per sub test. Alternatively, the arithmetic mean of the 5 test replicates for any of the pinprick stimuli for mechanical pain sensitivity is at least 3 times higher for the affected side compared to the contralateral side.
  • Presence of an average ongoing pain intensity score of \>4 to \<9 on the 0-10 point numerical rating scale (NRS) without the use of rescue medication within the 3 day Baseline pain intensity evaluation Period with at least 7 of 9 assessments being present.
  • Dissatisfaction with the current treatment (i.e., lack of efficacy or intolerable side effects) if taking an opioid or non opioid analgesic medication for the painful neuropathy before enrollment.

You may not qualify if:

  • Any kind of hepatic impairment at Visit 1 or at Visit 3.
  • Either active hepatitis within the past 3 months or presence of chronic hepatitis irrespective of its activity status.
  • Estimated creatinine clearance of less than 60 mL/minute x 1.73 m2 at either Visit 1 or at Visit 3.
  • Clinically relevant cardiac disease (e.g., unstable angina pectoris, angina pectoris Canadian Cardiovascular Society \[CCS\] Grade III to IV, acute myocardial infarction within the last 3 months, cardiac insufficiency New York Heart Association \[NYHA\] Class III to IV).
  • Electrocardiogram (ECG) with clinically relevant findings at either Visit 1 or at Visit 3, including but not limited to repeated prolongation of QTc \> 450 ms (Fridericia correction), or a history of additional risk factors for torsade de pointes (e.g., family history of Long QT Syndrome).
  • Clinically relevant pulmonary disease (e.g., Medical Research Council breathlessness scale of 2 or above).
  • Specific antitumor therapy within the last 6 months, e.g., adjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy, biologics, or angiogenesis inhibitors.
  • CYP2D6 poor metabolizer phenotype as predicted by CYP2D6 genotyping.
  • Presence of confounding pain conditions (e.g., ulnar nerve entrapment, radial nerve injury associated with major soft-tissue or bone damage, cervico-thoracic radiculopathy, carpal tunnel syndrome, chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, or complex regional pain syndrome type I or type II).
  • Phantom breast or phantom limb pain.
  • Presence of exclusively negative symptoms of neuropathic pain (e.g., hypoesthesia or total anesthesia) in the affected area.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (12)

DEU001

Mainz, D-55131, Germany

Location

DEU002

Regensburg, D-93053, Germany

Location

HUN004

Esztergom, H-2500, Hungary

Location

HUN003

Győr, H-9024, Hungary

Location

HUN001

Miskolc, H-3526, Hungary

Location

HUN008

Szikszó, H-3800, Hungary

Location

POL002

Gdansk, 80-214, Poland

Location

POL004

Lublin, 20-718, Poland

Location

POL005

Warsaw, 02-106, Poland

Location

GBR003

Belfast, BT2 7BA, United Kingdom

Location

GBR001

Glasgow, G11 6NT, United Kingdom

Location

GBR002

Manchester, M32 0UT, United Kingdom

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Neuralgia

Interventions

Pregabalin

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Peripheral Nervous System DiseasesNeuromuscular DiseasesNervous System DiseasesPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

gamma-Aminobutyric AcidAminobutyratesButyratesAcids, AcyclicCarboxylic AcidsOrganic ChemicalsAmino AcidsAmino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins

Results Point of Contact

Title
Director of Clinical Trials
Organization
Grünenthal GmbH

Study Officials

  • Director Clinical Trials

    Grünenthal GmbH

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 5, 2011

First Posted

December 5, 2011

Study Start

February 1, 2012

Primary Completion

January 1, 2013

Study Completion

January 1, 2013

Last Updated

October 28, 2019

Results First Posted

October 2, 2014

Record last verified: 2019-10

Locations