NCT02488824

Brief Summary

The ability to maintain normal body temperature (Tcore) is impaired in persons with tetraplegia: subnormal Tcore and vulnerability to hypothermia (\<95 F) have been documented in this population after exposure to even mild environmental temperatures. However, no work to date has addressed the effect of subnormal Tcore on cognitive performance in persons with tetraplegia despite studies with able-bodied (AB) individuals that have documented progressive decline in various aspects of cognitive performance associated with the magnitude of the depression in Tcore. The investigators' study will confirm and extend their initial observations in persons with higher cord lesions who have subnormal Tcore to show that cognitive performance will be improved by raising Tcore to euthermic levels. This improvement should be associated with greater function and independence, reintegration into society, and an improved quality of life. Specific Aims: During exposure to 95 F for up to 120 minutes in the seated position, the investigators' aims are: Primary Specific Aim: To determine if a modest rise in Tcore to euthermic levels has a positive effect on cognitive performance (attention, working memory, processing speed, and executive function) in persons with higher-level spinal cord injury (SCI). Primary Hypothesis: Based on the investigators' pilot data: (1) 80% of persons with SCI will demonstrate an increase of 1 F in Tcore, while none of the AB controls will demonstrate such an increase; (2) 80% of persons with SCI will have an improvement of at least one T-score in Stroop Interference scores (a validated measure of executive function), while none of the AB controls will demonstrate a change in cognitive performance. Secondary Specific Aim: To determine changes in: (1) The average of distal skin temperatures; (2) Sweat rate; and (3) Subjective rating of thermal sensitivity. Secondary Hypothesis: Persons with SCI will have less of a percent change in average distal skin temperatures and sweat rate, and will report blunted ratings of thermal sensitivity compared to that of AB controls.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
41

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2015

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2015

Completed
19 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 20, 2015

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 2, 2015

Completed
3.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 4, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 4, 2018

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

November 1, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

November 18, 2019

Status Verified

November 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

3.4 years

First QC Date

April 20, 2015

Results QC Date

July 16, 2019

Last Update Submit

November 1, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

QuadriplegiaParaplegiaSpinal Cord InjuryBody Temperature RegulationMild Cognitive Impairment

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Change in Core Body Temperature From Baseline to 120 Minutes Post Warm Challenge

    The investigators measured the effects of warm temperature (95 F) exposure, of up to 120 minutes, on the ability to maintain a constant body temperature (e.g., core temperature of 98.6 F) in both groups of subjects. Core temperature was measured at baseline (thermoneutral) and after 120 minutes of warm temperature exposure (Warm Challenge). The change in core temperature from baseline to 120 minutes of Warm Challenge was calculated.

    From Baseline to 120 Minutes

  • Change in Cognitive Performance From Baseline to 120 Minutes Post Warm Challenge

    Cognitive performance was assessed using a neuropsychological battery. Cognitive performance was assessed at 2 time points, at the end of baseline and after heat exposure (warm challenge) in both groups of subjects. The Stroop Word test measures processing speed. A T-Score of 50 means "0" difference of actual - predicted score (based on subject's age \& education level). T-Scores \<40 are considered "low"; T-Scores \>40 are considered "normal". Changes of 10 or greater are considered clinically significant. The lowest possible T-Score is 21; the highest possible T-Score is 80. The WAIS-IV Digit Span Sequencing measures auditory processing and working memory. Each test score is converted to a scaled score (M=10, SD=3) with higher scores considered better performance. The lowest possible scaled score is 1; the highest possible scaled score is 19.

    From Baseline to 120 Minutes

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Change in Distal Skin Temperatures From Baseline to 120 Minutes Post Warm Challenge

    From Baseline to 120 Minutes

  • Change in Sweat Rate From Baseline to 120 Minutes Post Warm Challenge

    From Baseline to 120 Minutes

  • Change in Thermal Sensitivity From Baseline to 120 Minutes Post Warm Challenge

    From Baseline to 120 Minutes

Study Arms (2)

Warm Temperature Exposure in Tetraplegia

EXPERIMENTAL

Subjects are persons with higher-level spinal cord injury, levels C3 to T4, and ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) level A and B, ages 18-68 years. Procedure is exposure to warm temperature (95 degrees Fahrenheit) for up to 2 hours in a temperature-controlled room in order to assess the body's temperature-regulating mechanisms and any associated change in cognitive performance

Procedure: Warm Temperature

Warm Temperature Exposure in Able-Bodied

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Subjects are able-bodied controls matched with participants with tetraplegia for age and gender. Procedure is exposure to warm temperature (95 degrees Fahrenheit) for up to 2 hours in a temperature-controlled room in order to assess the body's temperature-regulating mechanisms and any associated change in cognitive performance

Procedure: Warm Temperature

Interventions

Subjects will be exposed to a routinely encountered warm temperature (95 F) for up to to 2 hours, depending on their vital signs (BP, HR, Tcore) and tolerance (comfort).

Also known as: 95 F
Warm Temperature Exposure in Able-BodiedWarm Temperature Exposure in Tetraplegia

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 68 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Duration of injury 1 year
  • Level of SCI C3-T4, AIS A \& B
  • Tcore at BL \<98.6 F (subnormal core body temperature)
  • Euhydration
  • Gender and age-matched ( 5 years) AB controls (between 18-68 years of age)

You may not qualify if:

  • Known heart, kidney, peripheral vascular, or cerebral vascular disease
  • High blood pressure
  • History of traumatic brain injury or diagnosed cognitive impairment
  • Untreated thyroid disease
  • Diabetes mellitus
  • Acute illness or infection
  • Dehydration
  • Smoking
  • Pregnancy
  • Broken, inflamed, or otherwise fragile skin

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

James J. Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, NY

The Bronx, New York, 10468, United States

Location

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

QuadriplegiaHypothermiaCognitive DysfunctionParaplegiaSpinal Cord Injuries

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ParalysisNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsBody Temperature ChangesCognition DisordersNeurocognitive DisordersMental DisordersSpinal Cord DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesTrauma, Nervous SystemWounds and Injuries

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr John Handrakis
Organization
VAORD

Study Officials

  • John Philip Handrakis, PT DPT EdD

    James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
FED
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 20, 2015

First Posted

July 2, 2015

Study Start

April 1, 2015

Primary Completion

September 4, 2018

Study Completion

September 4, 2018

Last Updated

November 18, 2019

Results First Posted

November 1, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations