Comparison of Ultrasonic Osteotome and Conventional Drill Osteotome
SONO
Randomized Controlled Trial: Comparison of Ultrasonic Osteotome and Conventional Drill Osteotome
1 other identifier
interventional
190
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Ultrasonic bone osteotome has been utilized in various surgical field, but the use in neurosurgery especially in spine surgery is not widely spread. In the present study, the investigators are going to compare bony fusion rate after cervical laminotomy either with ultrasonic osteotome or conventional drill.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2015
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 2, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 26, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 2, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 4, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 4, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 27, 2025
CompletedMarch 27, 2025
March 1, 2025
2.7 years
June 26, 2015
April 16, 2024
March 9, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants With Bone Fusion
Bone fusion based on computed tomography scan taken at postoperative 6 months
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Bleeding Amount
during operation
Fracture of Laminar
during operation
Neck Pain/Arm Pain
postop 1 year
Functional Outcome
postop 1 year
Study Arms (2)
Ultrasonic osteotome
ACTIVE COMPARATORmaking gutter on the hinge side of lamina with ultrasonic osteotome
Drill
SHAM COMPARATORmaking gutter on the hinge side of lamina with conventional drill
Interventions
making gutter with ultrasonic osteotome
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- cervical myelopathy at 3 or more levels due to spondylosis, congenital stenosis, or OPLL;
- aged more than 20 years
- with American Society of Anesthesiology physical status class 1 or 2
You may not qualify if:
- \) concomitant neurological disease such as cerebral palsy or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; 2) concurrent cancer or infection; 3) previous cervical spinal surgery; 4) a trauma-associated lesion; 5) inability to be followed up (i.e., foreign patients); 6) refusal to participate in the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Seoul National University Hospital
Seoul, 110-744, South Korea
Related Publications (2)
Seo Y, Jeong S, Lee S, Kim TS, Kim JH, Chung CK, Lee CH, Rhee JM, Kong HJ, Kim CH. Machine-learning-based models for the optimization of post-cervical spinal laminoplasty outpatient follow-up schedules. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Sep 30;24(1):278. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02693-y.
PMID: 39350186DERIVEDKim CH, Chung CK, Choi Y, Kuo CC, Lee U, Yang SH, Lee CH, Jung JM, Hwang SH, Kim DH, Yoon JH, Paik S, Lee HJ, Jung S, Park SB, Kim KT, Park HP. The Efficacy of Ultrasonic Bone Scalpel for Unilateral Cervical Open-Door Laminoplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Neurosurgery. 2020 Jun 1;86(6):825-834. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyz301.
PMID: 31435653DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Chun Kee Chung
- Organization
- Seoul National Unversity College of Medicine
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- ultrasonic bone osteotome
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 26, 2015
First Posted
July 2, 2015
Study Start
June 2, 2015
Primary Completion
February 4, 2018
Study Completion
February 4, 2018
Last Updated
March 27, 2025
Results First Posted
March 27, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03