Molecular Content of Peri-implant Sulcus During Wound Healing and Osseointegration Following Drilling and Piezosurgery
Cytokine, Chemokine and Growth Factor Content of Peri-implant Sulcus During Wound Healing and Osseointegration After Conventional and Piezosurgical Implant Site Preparation
1 other identifier
interventional
14
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This study aims to evaluate the levels of cytokines, chemokines and growth factors in peri-implant sulcular fluid (PISF) during healing and osseointegration at osteotomy sites prepared either with piezosurgery (PS) or drills (D). Fourteen patients having bilateral partial edentulism in the posterior maxilla were enrolled and 38 osteotomies were prepared. Implants were placed with one-stage surgery. Insertion torque, early healing index, probing depth and modified gingival and plaque indices and crestal bone (CB) loss were measured. PISF was collected from 4 sites from each implant at weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24. PISF samples were analysed by a 30-Plex immunoassay. Effect of time and osteotomy method on molecules employed Brunner-Langer method.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started May 2013
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 13, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 29, 2018
CompletedMay 29, 2018
May 1, 2018
9 months
April 13, 2018
May 15, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Radiological bone levels at 12th and 24th weeks (Change from Baseline)
Bone Loss (measured distance from implant shoulder to first bone to implant contact on periodical radiographs and computerised cone beam tomography
Baseline (implant placement), 12th and 24th weeks after implant placement
Secondary Outcomes (26)
IL-1beta content of peri implant sulcus fluid at 4th, 8th, 12th and 24th weeks (Change from 2nd week)
2nd,4th, 8th, 12th and 24th weeks
G.CSF content of peri implant sulcus fluid at 4th, 8th, 12th and 24th weeks (Change from 2nd week)
2nd,4th, 8th, 12th and 24th weeks
IL-13 content of peri implant sulcus fluid at 4th, 8th, 12th and 24th weeks (Change from 2nd week)
2nd,4th, 8th, 12th and 24th weeks
IL-6 content of peri implant sulcus fluid at 4th, 8th, 12th and 24th weeks (Change from 2nd week)
2nd,4th, 8th, 12th and 24th weeks
IL-12 content of peri implant sulcus fluid at 4th, 8th, 12th and 24th weeks (Change from 2nd week)
2nd,4th, 8th, 12th and 24th weeks
- +21 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Piezosurgery
EXPERIMENTALOsteotomy preparation entirely with piezosurgery tips and equicrestal placement of a 4.1 mm implant in the piezosurgery (test) group were performed as follows: 1.15 mm initial MB1 tip, 1.95 mm MB2 tip, control of depth, diameter and direction of osteotomy with 2.0 mm paralleling pin, 2.5 mm MB3 tip, 2.8 mm MB4 tip, 2.8 mm paralleling pin, 3.05 mm MB5 tip, 3.3 mm MB6 tip, control of final diameter of the osteotomy with 3.5 mm paralleling pin, placement of the 4.1 mm diameter implant and connection of a 4 mm-wide healing abutment.
Drill
ACTIVE COMPARATORPreparation of an implant recipient site entirely with relevant drills were performed as follows: Osteotomy preparation and equicrestal placement of a 4.1 mm diameter implant in the drill (control) group were performed as follows: initial trispade drill, 2.0 mm pilot drill, control of depth, diameter and direction of osteotomy with 2.0 mm paralleling pin, 2.5 mm drill, 2.8 mm drill, 2.8 mm paralleling pin, 3.5 mm drill, control of final diameter of the osteotomy with 3.5 mm paralleling pin, placement of the 4.1 mm diameter implant and connection of a 4 mm wide healing abutment.
Interventions
Preparation of implant beds entirely with piezo surgery implant tips
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Bilateral partial edentulism in posterior maxilla
- \>8 mm available bone height (distance between bone crest and maxillary sinus) and ≥7 mm bone width
- At least 2 mm buccal keratinized mucosa width and 3 mm mucosa thickness.
You may not qualify if:
- Diseases and conditions or medications which may negatively influence biological dynamics of bone and wound healing
- Ridge deficiencies requiring additional augmentation
- Indication of sinus lifting with crestal or lateral approach
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Ege Universitylead
Related Publications (12)
Berglundh T, Abrahamsson I, Lang NP, Lindhe J. De novo alveolar bone formation adjacent to endosseous implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003 Jun;14(3):251-62. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.00972.x.
PMID: 12755774RESULTBerglundh T, Abrahamsson I, Welander M, Lang NP, Lindhe J. Morphogenesis of the peri-implant mucosa: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 Feb;18(1):1-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01380.x.
PMID: 17224016RESULTTomasi C, Tessarolo F, Caola I, Wennstrom J, Nollo G, Berglundh T. Morphogenesis of peri-implant mucosa revisited: an experimental study in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Sep;25(9):997-1003. doi: 10.1111/clr.12223. Epub 2013 Jun 26.
PMID: 23799997RESULTTomasi C, Tessarolo F, Caola I, Piccoli F, Wennstrom JL, Nollo G, Berglundh T. Early healing of peri-implant mucosa in man. J Clin Periodontol. 2016 Oct;43(10):816-24. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12591. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
PMID: 27329966RESULTInsua A, Monje A, Wang HL, Miron RJ. Basis of bone metabolism around dental implants during osseointegration and peri-implant bone loss. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2017 Jul;105(7):2075-2089. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.36060. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
PMID: 28281321RESULTEsteves JC, Marcantonio E Jr, de Souza Faloni AP, Rocha FR, Marcantonio RA, Wilk K, Intini G. Dynamics of bone healing after osteotomy with piezosurgery or conventional drilling - histomorphometrical, immunohistochemical, and molecular analysis. J Transl Med. 2013 Sep 23;11:221. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-11-221.
PMID: 24053147RESULTPreti G, Martinasso G, Peirone B, Navone R, Manzella C, Muzio G, Russo C, Canuto RA, Schierano G. Cytokines and growth factors involved in the osseointegration of oral titanium implants positioned using piezoelectric bone surgery versus a drill technique: a pilot study in minipigs. J Periodontol. 2007 Apr;78(4):716-22. doi: 10.1902/jop.2007.060285.
PMID: 17397320RESULTPeker Tekdal G, Bostanci N, Belibasakis GN, Gurkan A. The effect of piezoelectric surgery implant osteotomy on radiological and molecular parameters of peri-implant crestal bone loss: a randomized, controlled, split-mouth trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 May;27(5):535-44. doi: 10.1111/clr.12620. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
PMID: 26077862RESULTBielemann AM, Marcello-Machado RM, Leite FRM, Martinho FC, Chagas-Junior OL, Antoninha Del Bel Cury A, Faot F. Comparison between inflammation-related markers in peri-implant crevicular fluid and clinical parameters during osseointegration in edentulous jaws. Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Jan;22(1):531-543. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2169-0. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
PMID: 28710652RESULTChien HH, Meng HW, Gross AC, Eubank TD, Yildiz VO, Leblebicioglu B. The Effect of Platform Switching on Periimplant Crevicular Fluid Content During Early Wound Healing. Implant Dent. 2016 Oct;25(5):629-37. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000463.
PMID: 27504534RESULTEmecen-Huja P, Eubank TD, Shapiro V, Yildiz V, Tatakis DN, Leblebicioglu B. Peri-implant versus periodontal wound healing. J Clin Periodontol. 2013 Aug;40(8):816-24. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12127. Epub 2013 Jun 18.
PMID: 23772674RESULTSculean A, Gruber R, Bosshardt DD. Soft tissue wound healing around teeth and dental implants. J Clin Periodontol. 2014 Apr;41 Suppl 15:S6-22. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12206.
PMID: 24641001RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 13, 2018
First Posted
May 29, 2018
Study Start
May 1, 2013
Primary Completion
February 1, 2014
Study Completion
April 1, 2015
Last Updated
May 29, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share