Study Stopped
The investiagtor abandoned the project.
Study of the Quality of Post Release on Scanners Operating in Minimally Invasive Arthrodesis
Study of the Quality of the Release on Postoperative Scanners in Minimally Invasive Arthrodesis
1 other identifier
observational
N/A
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
For twenty years, as for other surgical disciplines, new minimally invasive techniques have been developed with the main goal the reduction of muscle trauma associated with the surrounding roads "classic" and reduce morbidity linked to this one. More recently, minimally invasive methods dedicated to spinal surgery were established, for the treatment of herniated discs initially, then for narrow lumbar canals. The canal release on minimally invasive fusion, using a tubular system for muscle retraction is a new technique that has proven effective: post operative pain reduction of hospital stay and blood loss. The objective of the study is to investigate the quality of ductal release in these minimally invasive fusions. Main objective of the study: Evaluation of the quality of the release of post scanners operative minimally invasive arthrodesis Secondary Objectives: Assessment rates/types of early complications of technical Minimally invasive - early postoperative results (postoperative pain, analgesic consumption, length of hospital stay, blood loss) - in clinical outcomes in the short and medium term decompression after minimally invasive fusion.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Feb 2015
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 2, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 2, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 2, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 24, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 29, 2016
CompletedAugust 10, 2018
August 1, 2018
Same day
August 24, 2016
August 9, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
comparing the measured height of the foramen on the CT scanner
The evaluation of the primary objective criterion is comparing the height of the foramen measured on CT pre- and post-opéraoires between the lower edge of the overlying pedicle and the top edge of the pedicle underlying the sagittal sections.
Day -1 and Day 1 after surgery
Assessment of change of MRI volume of dural sac
For central stenosis, Postoperative MRI will be performed and the volume of the dural sac will be compared to preoperative MRI on axial slices
Day -1 and Day 1 after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Assessment of change of Oswestry score
Day -1 and Day 1 after surgery
Evaluation of pain by visual analogue scale VAS
Day -1 and Day 1 after surgery
Eligibility Criteria
Patients admitted to hospital with Paris Saint Joseph with canal compression on one floor, for whom a scan of the spine is performed preoperatively
You may qualify if:
- Ductal compression on one floor
- Scanner spine preoperatively
You may not qualify if:
- Spondylolisthesis significant (greater than grade 2)
- Stenoses multi layered
- Major spinal deformities
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Guillaume P RIOUALLON, MD
Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 24, 2016
First Posted
August 29, 2016
Study Start
February 2, 2015
Primary Completion
February 2, 2015
Study Completion
February 2, 2015
Last Updated
August 10, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-08