NCT02881593

Brief Summary

For twenty years, as for other surgical disciplines, new minimally invasive techniques have been developed with the main goal the reduction of muscle trauma associated with the surrounding roads "classic" and reduce morbidity linked to this one. More recently, minimally invasive methods dedicated to spinal surgery were established, for the treatment of herniated discs initially, then for narrow lumbar canals. The canal release on minimally invasive fusion, using a tubular system for muscle retraction is a new technique that has proven effective: post operative pain reduction of hospital stay and blood loss. The objective of the study is to investigate the quality of ductal release in these minimally invasive fusions. Main objective of the study: Evaluation of the quality of the release of post scanners operative minimally invasive arthrodesis Secondary Objectives: Assessment rates/types of early complications of technical Minimally invasive - early postoperative results (postoperative pain, analgesic consumption, length of hospital stay, blood loss) - in clinical outcomes in the short and medium term decompression after minimally invasive fusion.

Trial Health

15
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2015

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 2, 2015

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 2, 2015

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 2, 2015

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 24, 2016

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 29, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

August 10, 2018

Status Verified

August 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

Same day

First QC Date

August 24, 2016

Last Update Submit

August 9, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

Operating in Minimally Invasive

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • comparing the measured height of the foramen on the CT scanner

    The evaluation of the primary objective criterion is comparing the height of the foramen measured on CT pre- and post-opéraoires between the lower edge of the overlying pedicle and the top edge of the pedicle underlying the sagittal sections.

    Day -1 and Day 1 after surgery

  • Assessment of change of MRI volume of dural sac

    For central stenosis, Postoperative MRI will be performed and the volume of the dural sac will be compared to preoperative MRI on axial slices

    Day -1 and Day 1 after surgery

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Assessment of change of Oswestry score

    Day -1 and Day 1 after surgery

  • Evaluation of pain by visual analogue scale VAS

    Day -1 and Day 1 after surgery

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients admitted to hospital with Paris Saint Joseph with canal compression on one floor, for whom a scan of the spine is performed preoperatively

You may qualify if:

  • Ductal compression on one floor
  • Scanner spine preoperatively

You may not qualify if:

  • Spondylolisthesis significant (greater than grade 2)
  • Stenoses multi layered
  • Major spinal deformities

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Ankylosis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Joint DiseasesMusculoskeletal Diseases

Study Officials

  • Guillaume P RIOUALLON, MD

    Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
0

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 24, 2016

First Posted

August 29, 2016

Study Start

February 2, 2015

Primary Completion

February 2, 2015

Study Completion

February 2, 2015

Last Updated

August 10, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-08