An Extension Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of BMN 190 in Patients With CLN2 Disease
A Multicenter, Multinational, Extension Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of BMN 190 in Patients With CLN2 Disease
1 other identifier
interventional
23
4 countries
4
Brief Summary
The Phase 1/2 study (190-201) evaluated the efficacy and safety of a 300 mg dose of BMN 190 administered every other week (qow) to patients with CLN2. The dose and regimen for this study (190-202) are based on the results of the 190-201 study. The rationale for this phase 2 extension study is to provide patients who complete the 190-201 study with the option to continue BMN 190 treatment. The 190-202 study is an open label extension protocol to assess long-term safety and efficacy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_1
Started Feb 2015
Longer than P75 for phase_1
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 24, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 30, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 10, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 10, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 24, 2022
CompletedAugust 24, 2022
July 1, 2022
5.9 years
April 24, 2015
December 10, 2021
July 28, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Probability of Unreversed 2-point Decline in Motor-language (ML) Score or Score of 0
Motor and Language are each 0-3 point subscales in which 3 represents best function and 0 represents loss of function. Thus, the 0-6 point ML score was used as the primary mode of evaluation of loss of function. In 190-201, the primary endpoint was a responder endpoint: unreversed ML 2-point decline or score of 0 at Week 48 compared to the 50% rate expected in natural history using the 1-sample binomial test. For 190-202, the primary endpoint was revised to assess response over the full duration of follow-up. It is not clear, given the variable follow-up much greater than 48 weeks, what response rate is expected in natural history. For this reason, the assessment of the primary endpoint is based on comparing to natural history data and using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model with covariate adjustment (i.e., baseline ML score and age as continuous covariates, and genotype \[common alleles\] and sex as categorical covariates).
Up to Week 289
Probability of Unreversed Motor-language (ML) Score of Zero.
Motor and Language are each 0-3 point subscales in which 3 represents best function and 0 represents loss of function. Thus, the 0-6 point ML score was used as the primary mode of evaluation of loss of function. In 190-201, the primary endpoint was a responder endpoint: unreversed ML 2-point decline or score of 0 at Week 48 compared to the 50% rate expected in natural history using the 1-sample binomial test. For 190-202, the primary endpoint was revised to assess response over the full duration of follow-up. It is not clear, given the variable follow-up much greater than 48 weeks, what response rate is expected in natural history. For this reason, the assessment of the primary endpoint is based on comparing to natural history data and using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model with covariate adjustment (baseline ML score, age, genotype \[common alleles\], and sex).
Up to Week 289
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Whole Brain Volume
Baseline (Week 1 of BMN 190-201) to Week 289 / Last observation
Volume of Cerebrospinal Fluid
Baseline (Week 1 of BMN 190-201) to Week 289 / Last observation
Volume of Total Cortical Gray Matter
Baseline (Week 1 of BMN 190-201) to Week 289 / Last observation
Total White Matter Volume
Baseline (Week 1 of BMN 190-201) to Week 289 / Last observation
Whole Brain Apparent Diffusion Coefficient
Baseline (Week 1 of BMN 190-201) to Week 289 / Last observation
Study Arms (1)
BMN190 recombinant human tripeptidyl peptidase-1 (rhTPP1)
EXPERIMENTALAll 190-202 study subjects administered BMN 190 300 mg by continuous Intracerebroventricular (ICV) infusion at a rate of 2.5 mL/hour for approximately 4 hours) every 14 days.
Interventions
300 mg Intracerebroventricular (ICV) infusion administered every other week for up to 240 weeks
Surgical implantation of an MRI compatible ICV access device in the lateral ventricle of the right hemisphere is required for administration of study drug.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Must have completed 48 weeks in Study 190-201.
- Is willing and able to provide written, signed informed consent. Or, in the case of patients under the age of 18 (or other age as defined by regional law or regulation), provide written assent (if required) and have written informed consent, signed by a legally authorized representative, after the nature of the study has been explained, and prior to performance of research-related procedures.
- Males and females who are of reproductive age should practice true abstinence, defined as no sexual activity, during the study and for 6 months after the study has been completed (or withdrawal from the study). If sexually active and not practicing true abstinence, males and females of reproductive age must use a highly effective method of contraception while participating in the study.
- If female, of childbearing potential, must have a negative pregnancy test at the Screening Visit and be willing to have additional pregnancy tests done during the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Has had a loss of 3 or more points in the combined motor and language components of the Hamburg CLN2 rating scale between Baseline of Study 190-201 and the Study Completion visit in Study 190-201 and would not benefit from enrolling in the study in the Investigator's discretion.
- Has a score of 0 points on the combined motor and language components of the Hamburg CLN2 rating scale.
- Is pregnant or breastfeeding, at Baseline, or planning to become pregnant (self or partner) at any time during the study.
- Has used any investigational product (other than BMN 190 in 190-201), or investigational medical device, within 30 days prior to Baseline; or is required to use any investigational agent prior to completion of all scheduled study assessments.
- Has a concurrent disease or condition that would interfere with study participation, or pose a safety risk, as determined by the Investigator.
- Has any condition that, in the view of the Investigator, places the patient at high risk of poor treatment compliance or of not completing the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (4)
Nationwide Children's Hospital
Columbus, Ohio, 43205, United States
Universitaetsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Hamburg, 20246, Germany
Children's Hospital Bambino Gesù,IRCCS
Rome, Piazza, 00165, Italy
Great Ormond Street Childrens Hospital
London, WC1N 3JH, United Kingdom
Related Publications (4)
Specchio N, Gissen P, de Los Reyes E, Olaye A, Camp C, Curteis T, Griffiths A, Butt T, Cohen-Pfeffer J, Slasor P, Sisic Z, Jain M, Schulz A. Exploring concurrent validity of the CLN2 Clinical Rating Scale: Comparison to PedsQL using cerliponase alfa clinical trial data. PLoS One. 2024 May 22;19(5):e0302382. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302382. eCollection 2024.
PMID: 38776275DERIVEDSchulz A, Specchio N, de Los Reyes E, Gissen P, Nickel M, Trivisano M, Aylward SC, Chakrapani A, Schwering C, Wibbeler E, Westermann LM, Ballon DJ, Dyke JP, Cherukuri A, Bondade S, Slasor P, Cohen Pfeffer J. Safety and efficacy of cerliponase alfa in children with neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis type 2 (CLN2 disease): an open-label extension study. Lancet Neurol. 2024 Jan;23(1):60-70. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(23)00384-8.
PMID: 38101904DERIVEDGissen P, Specchio N, Olaye A, Jain M, Butt T, Ghosh W, Ruban-Fell B, Griffiths A, Camp C, Sisic Z, Schwering C, Wibbeler E, Trivisano M, Lee L, Nickel M, Mortensen A, Schulz A. Investigating health-related quality of life in rare diseases: a case study in utility value determination for patients with CLN2 disease (neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis type 2). Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2021 May 12;16(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s13023-021-01829-x.
PMID: 33980287DERIVEDSchulz A, Ajayi T, Specchio N, de Los Reyes E, Gissen P, Ballon D, Dyke JP, Cahan H, Slasor P, Jacoby D, Kohlschutter A; CLN2 Study Group. Study of Intraventricular Cerliponase Alfa for CLN2 Disease. N Engl J Med. 2018 May 17;378(20):1898-1907. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1712649. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
PMID: 29688815DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Trial Specialist
- Organization
- BioMarin Pharmaceutical, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Medical Monitor, MD
BioMarin Pharmaceutical
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 24, 2015
First Posted
June 30, 2015
Study Start
February 1, 2015
Primary Completion
December 10, 2020
Study Completion
December 10, 2020
Last Updated
August 24, 2022
Results First Posted
August 24, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-07