NCT02484781

Brief Summary

Total hip replacement surgery is a very successful operation with good long-term results. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty is offered as a treatment option for young and active patients with osteoarthritis of the hip. It has been proposed as a treatment option for younger patients because of claims that it preserves femoral bone stock and has better functional outcomes. The assessment of gait after hip replacement surgery may be able to determine functional differences between patients who have undergone total hip replacement / arthroplasty (THA) versus hip resurfacing.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
34

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2015

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 9, 2015

Completed
21 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 30, 2015

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2015

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2015

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

July 15, 2016

Status Verified

July 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

Same day

First QC Date

June 9, 2015

Last Update Submit

July 14, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

Gait disorderResurfacing Hip ArthroplastyTotal Hip Arthroplasty

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (8)

  • Top walking speed

    Mean top walking speed in kilometers / hour assessed on a trendmill

    5 years postoperative

  • Walking cadence

    Mean steps / minute at top walking speed assessed on a trendmill

    5 years postoperative

  • Step length

    Mean step distance in meters at top walking speed assessed on a trendmill

    5 years postoperative

  • Maximum Push off force (N/kg) per cycle

    Mean ground reaction forces in Newton / kilogram on a trendmill

    5 years postoperative

  • Maximum weight acceptance (N/kg) per cycle

    Mean ground reaction forces assessed on a trendmill

    5 years postoperative

  • Mid-stance force (N/kg) per cycle

    Mean ground reaction forces assessed on a trendmill

    5 years postoperative

  • Hip maximum flexion/extension per cycle

    Mean hip kinematics in degrees assessed on a trendmill

    5 years postoperative

  • Hip maximum internal/external rotation per cycle

    Mean hip kinematics in degrees assessed on a trendmill

    5 years postoperative

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Postoperative hip functionality after hip arthroplasty.

    5 years postoperative

  • General Health according EurQol-5D

    5 years postoperative

  • Physical activity level according the UCLA-activity score

    5 years postoperative

Study Arms (2)

Total Hip Arthroplasty

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Gait analysis on a trendmill of patients with a well functioning total hip arthroplasty on a trendmill

Other: Gait analysis on a trendmill

Resurfacing Hip Arthroplasty

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Gait analysis on a trendmill of patients with a well functioning resurfacing hip arthroplasty on a trendmill

Other: Gait analysis on a trendmill

Interventions

Gait analysis on a trendmill "GRAIL" to analyse spatio-temporal kinetics and kinematics when flat walking and inclining

Also known as: Gait realtime analysis interactive lab: MOTEK Medical
Resurfacing Hip ArthroplastyTotal Hip Arthroplasty

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patient part of randomised controlled trial (RCT) of hip resurfacing versus MoM total hip arthroplasty for symptomatic osteoarthritis of the hip
  • Patient must be able to consent to the study (written informed consent)
  • Patients who are functioning well post-operatively and not under routine follow up
  • Patients who are able to walk without any safety rail assistance on the treadmill

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient not originally randomised during an RCT of hip resurfacing versus MoM total hip arthroplasty
  • Patients who suffer from any neurological or musculoskeletal conditions that might make a gait test dangerous.
  • Patients whose cognitive function prevents them from understanding the study
  • Patients who have had or are awaiting revision surgery for their hip

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Rijnstate Hospital

Arnhem, Gelderland, 6800WC, Netherlands

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Aqil A, Drabu R, Bergmann JH, Masjedi M, Manning V, Andrews B, Muirhead-Allwood SK, Cobb JP. The gait of patients with one resurfacing and one replacement hip: a single blinded controlled study. Int Orthop. 2013 May;37(5):795-801. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-1819-3. Epub 2013 Feb 27.

    PMID: 23443980BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Mobility LimitationGait Disorders, Neurologic

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Signs and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System Diseases

Study Officials

  • Job LC Susante, Dr

    Rijnstate Hospital, orthopedic surgeon

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Dr. JLC van Susante

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 9, 2015

First Posted

June 30, 2015

Study Start

December 1, 2015

Primary Completion

December 1, 2015

Study Completion

December 1, 2015

Last Updated

July 15, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-07

Locations