All Polyethylene Versus Metal Backed Tibial Components in Knee Replacement
A Prospective Randomised Control Trial to Compare Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of the Press-Fit Condylar All-Polyethylene Tibial Component With Metal-Backed Tibial Component Implant, in Patients Aged 75 Years or Over
1 other identifier
interventional
88
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most commonly performed orthopaedic procedures. Approximately 84,000 knee replacement procedures were recorded in the UK in 2012. The main goal of TKA is to relieve the disabling pain of arthritic disease. Patient satisfaction following TKA is related to quick recovery and return to daily activities. This can be dependent on the design of the implant used in the knee. Improvements in implant design and surgical technique mean many modern designs offer implant survival rates beyond 10 - 15 years. As cost pressure increases in the NHS the unit cost of implants is now being scrutinised, particularly with regard to cost effectiveness. The Press-Fit Condylar (PFC) Sigma implant can be used with either a conventional metal backed or alternatively an all polyethylene tibial component (part fitted to the shin bone), the latter considerably cheaper to manufacture. Four small prospective randomised trials and one large regional registry study with long follow up support the safe use of all polyethylene tibial components in TKA. The investigators will therefore undertake a prospective randomised controlled trial comparing the results of all polyethylene tibial components with those of conventional metal backed tibial components in patients aged 75 or over, comparing both clinical outcome and radiological survivorship. The type of knee replacement used for each patient (metal-backed or polyethylene) will be chosen at random once a patient has agreed to take part in the study. Data will be collected by means of follow-up appointments and questionnaires and clinical tests both before the operation 1 year, 2 years and 5 years postoperatively. This will allow us to see how both types of knee replacement perform over time and if one performs better than the other in terms of patients movement, pain and functional activities.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 17, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 26, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2025
CompletedDecember 2, 2024
November 1, 2024
8.5 years
June 17, 2015
November 29, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
American Knee Society Score
5 year outcomes
Study Arms (2)
All-polyethylene Tibial component
ACTIVE COMPARATORSigma PFC All polyethylene Tibial component will be implanted
Metal Backed Tibial component
ACTIVE COMPARATORSigma PFC metal-backed tibial component will be implanted
Interventions
patients will receive either an all polyethylene tibial component or a metal- backed component
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients suitable for simple cemented primary knee arthroplasty
- Patients presenting with osteoarthritis of the knee
- Patients with inflammatory arthropathy, requiring total knee arthroplasty
- Patients must be ambulatory at time of preoperative assessment clinic
- Patients must be able to understand instructions and be willing to return for follow up
- Patients aged 75 years or over at the time of surgery
You may not qualify if:
- Previous knee surgery (except arthroscopic / open meniscectomy)
- Patients with significant medical co-morbidity
- Disorders causing abnormal gait or significant pain
- Patients unable to consent
- Severe visual impairment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Trauma & Orthopaedic Dept, Tunbridge Wells Hospital
Pembury, Kent, TN2 4QJ, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Paul Gibb
Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS trust
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Mr Nick Bowman- Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 17, 2015
First Posted
June 26, 2015
Study Start
January 1, 2017
Primary Completion
July 1, 2025
Study Completion
July 1, 2025
Last Updated
December 2, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-11