Assessment of HydroxyColl Bone Graft Substitute in High Tibial Osteotomy Wedge Grafting.
HColl_HTO
Post Market Clinical Follow up - Assessment of HydroxyColl Bone Graft Substitute in High Tibial Osteotomy Wedge Grafting.
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The overall goal of this study is to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of Hydroxycoll bone graft substitute when used in the treatment of patients undergoing surgical treatment for varus mis-alignment in medial unicompartmental osteoarthritis of the knee. HydroxyColl bone graft substitute will be evaluated when utilized in Open Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy with medial plate fixation. Its safety profile will be evaluated as defined by the number of reported adverse events.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2018
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 30, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 3, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 26, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 27, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 29, 2020
CompletedJuly 26, 2018
July 1, 2018
1.7 years
July 3, 2018
July 17, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (18)
Radiological Healing
clinical assessment of healing based on radiological observations by a member of the clinical team
Week 6
Radiological Healing
clinical assessment of healing based on radiological observations by a member of the clinical team
Week 12
Radiological Healing
clinical assessment of healing based on radiological observations by a member of the clinical team
Week 52
Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
Patient reported outcomes relating to knee pain and function (Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in sport and recreation (Sport/Rec) and knee related Quality of life (QOL)). KOOS consists of 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in sport and recreation (Sport/Rec) and knee related Quality of life (QOL). Standardized answer options are given (5 Likert boxes) and each question is assigned a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale.
Day 0
Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
Patient reported outcomes relating to knee pain and function (Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in sport and recreation (Sport/Rec) and knee related Quality of life (QOL)). KOOS consists of 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in sport and recreation (Sport/Rec) and knee related Quality of life (QOL). Standardized answer options are given (5 Likert boxes) and each question is assigned a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale.
Day 1
Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
Patient reported outcomes relating to knee pain and function (Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in sport and recreation (Sport/Rec) and knee related Quality of life (QOL)). KOOS consists of 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in sport and recreation (Sport/Rec) and knee related Quality of life (QOL). Standardized answer options are given (5 Likert boxes) and each question is assigned a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale.
Week 6
Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
Patient reported outcomes relating to knee pain and function (Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in sport and recreation (Sport/Rec) and knee related Quality of life (QOL)). KOOS consists of 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in sport and recreation (Sport/Rec) and knee related Quality of life (QOL). Standardized answer options are given (5 Likert boxes) and each question is assigned a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale.
Week 12
Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
Patient reported outcomes relating to knee pain and function (Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in sport and recreation (Sport/Rec) and knee related Quality of life (QOL)). KOOS consists of 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in sport and recreation (Sport/Rec) and knee related Quality of life (QOL). Standardized answer options are given (5 Likert boxes) and each question is assigned a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale.
Week 52
EQ5D Score
Patient reported outcomes relating to mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels (1-5): no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems.
Day 0
EQ5D Score
Patient reported outcomes relating to mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels (1-5): no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems.
Day 1
EQ5D Score
Patient reported outcomes relating to mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels (1-5): no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems.
Week 6
EQ5D Score
Patient reported outcomes relating to mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels (1-5): no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems.
Week 12
EQ5D Score
Patient reported outcomes relating to mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels (1-5): no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems.
Week 52
VAS Score
Patient reported outcomes relating to pain. Visual analog scale \[VAS\] is a measure of pain intensity. It is a continuous scale comprised of a horizontal (called horizontal visual analogue scale) or,vertical called vertical visual analog scale usually 10 cm or 100 mm length \[both the gradations are used\]. It is anchored by two verbal descriptors, one for each symptom extreme.For pain intensity, the scale is most commonly anchored by "no pain" (score of 0) and "pain as bad as it could be" or "worst imaginable pain" (score of 100 \[on 100-mm scale\].
Day 0
VAS Score
Patient reported outcomes relating to pain. Visual analog scale \[VAS\] is a measure of pain intensity. It is a continuous scale comprised of a horizontal (called horizontal visual analogue scale) or,vertical called vertical visual analog scale usually 10 cm or 100 mm length \[both the gradations are used\]. It is anchored by two verbal descriptors, one for each symptom extreme.For pain intensity, the scale is most commonly anchored by "no pain" (score of 0) and "pain as bad as it could be" or "worst imaginable pain" (score of 100 \[on 100-mm scale\].
Day 1
VAS Score
Patient reported outcomes relating to pain. Visual analog scale \[VAS\] is a measure of pain intensity. It is a continuous scale comprised of a horizontal (called horizontal visual analogue scale) or,vertical called vertical visual analog scale usually 10 cm or 100 mm length \[both the gradations are used\]. It is anchored by two verbal descriptors, one for each symptom extreme.For pain intensity, the scale is most commonly anchored by "no pain" (score of 0) and "pain as bad as it could be" or "worst imaginable pain" (score of 100 \[on 100-mm scale\].
Week 6
VAS Score
Patient reported outcomes relating to pain. Visual analog scale \[VAS\] is a measure of pain intensity. It is a continuous scale comprised of a horizontal (called horizontal visual analogue scale) or,vertical called vertical visual analog scale usually 10 cm or 100 mm length \[both the gradations are used\]. It is anchored by two verbal descriptors, one for each symptom extreme.For pain intensity, the scale is most commonly anchored by "no pain" (score of 0) and "pain as bad as it could be" or "worst imaginable pain" (score of 100 \[on 100-mm scale\].
Week 12
VAS Score
Patient reported outcomes relating to pain. Visual analog scale \[VAS\] is a measure of pain intensity. It is a continuous scale comprised of a horizontal (called horizontal visual analogue scale) or,vertical called vertical visual analog scale usually 10 cm or 100 mm length \[both the gradations are used\]. It is anchored by two verbal descriptors, one for each symptom extreme.For pain intensity, the scale is most commonly anchored by "no pain" (score of 0) and "pain as bad as it could be" or "worst imaginable pain" (score of 100 \[on 100-mm scale\].
Week 52
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Safety outcome based on clinical assessment of the adverse events reported during the trial.
Day 0
Safety outcome based on clinical assessment of the adverse events reported during the trial
Day 1
Safety outcome based on clinical assessment of the adverse events reported during the trial
Week 6
Safety outcome based on clinical assessment of the adverse events reported during the trial
Week 12
Safety outcome based on clinical assessment of the adverse events reported during the trial
Week 52
Study Arms (2)
No Bone Graft
OTHEROpen Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy with medial plate fixation (without bone grafting)
HydroxyColl Bone Graft Substitute
ACTIVE COMPARATOROpen Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy with medial plate fixation (with bone grafting) using Hydroxycoll bone graft substitute.
Interventions
The intervention involves the use of Open Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy with DePuy Synthes TomoFix Medial High Tibial Plate (MHT) fixation (Standard of Care) with the HydroxyColl bone graft substitute i.e. bone graft substitute vs. no bone graft substitute.
The intervention involves the use of Open Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy with DePuy Synthes TomoFix Medial High Tibial Plate (MHT) fixation (Standard of Care) without the HydroxyColl bone graft substitute i.e. bone graft substitute vs. no bone graft substitute.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Able to give written informed consent to participate in this study
- Both male and females who will be admitted to the hospital for treatment of varus mis-alignment in medial unicompartmental osteoarthritis of the knee of the degree to which the surgeon deems it necessary to include a bone grafting procedure
- Kellgren-Lawrence grade 1-4
- Ability and willingness to comply with all study requirements
You may not qualify if:
- History or presence of the following conditions: known sensitivity to bovine collagen or hydroxyapatite materials; diabetes, immune-compromised, vascular disease, metabolic/systemic bone disorder, osteomyelitis
- Failure to provide written informed consent
- Severe acute or chronic medical illness, including symptomatic cardiovascular disease
- Weight less than 40 kilograms
- Any clinically significant abnormality at the time of submission, in the judgement of the investigator would preclude safe completion of the study
- Any use of estrogens, estrogen-progestin therapy, selective estrogens receptor modulators (SERMs) or calcitonin within 3 months, and use of bisphosphonates or recombinant PTH 1-34, 1-84 or other PTH fragments/analogues within the last 6 months
- History of alcohol or drug abuse within the last year
- History of non-compliance to medical regimens and/or patients who are considered potentially unreliable
- Significant psychiatric disorder or behaviour
- Presence of any concomitant condition which, in the opinion of the investigator or the sponsor, may interfere with the interpretation of efficacy and safety data gathered in this study including chronic infections
- Chronic or \>7 days concomitant use of oral corticosteroids within 1 month prior to screening
- Regular smoker (more than 10 cigarettes per day) for the last 12 months
- Participation in another interventional orthopaedic clinical trial within 1 month of the beginning of this study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Basingstoke & North Hampshire Hospital
Basingstoke, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michael Risebury, MA MBBS FRCS
Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 3, 2018
First Posted
July 26, 2018
Study Start
April 30, 2018
Primary Completion
December 27, 2019
Study Completion
April 29, 2020
Last Updated
July 26, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-07