NCT03601130

Brief Summary

The overall goal of this study is to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of Hydroxycoll bone graft substitute when used in the treatment of patients undergoing surgical treatment for varus mis-alignment in medial unicompartmental osteoarthritis of the knee. HydroxyColl bone graft substitute will be evaluated when utilized in Open Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy with medial plate fixation. Its safety profile will be evaluated as defined by the number of reported adverse events.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2018

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 30, 2018

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 3, 2018

Completed
23 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 26, 2018

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 27, 2019

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 29, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

July 26, 2018

Status Verified

July 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

1.7 years

First QC Date

July 3, 2018

Last Update Submit

July 17, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

osteotomyosteoarthritisbone graft substitute

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (18)

  • Radiological Healing

    clinical assessment of healing based on radiological observations by a member of the clinical team

    Week 6

  • Radiological Healing

    clinical assessment of healing based on radiological observations by a member of the clinical team

    Week 12

  • Radiological Healing

    clinical assessment of healing based on radiological observations by a member of the clinical team

    Week 52

  • Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)

    Patient reported outcomes relating to knee pain and function (Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in sport and recreation (Sport/Rec) and knee related Quality of life (QOL)). KOOS consists of 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in sport and recreation (Sport/Rec) and knee related Quality of life (QOL). Standardized answer options are given (5 Likert boxes) and each question is assigned a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale.

    Day 0

  • Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)

    Patient reported outcomes relating to knee pain and function (Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in sport and recreation (Sport/Rec) and knee related Quality of life (QOL)). KOOS consists of 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in sport and recreation (Sport/Rec) and knee related Quality of life (QOL). Standardized answer options are given (5 Likert boxes) and each question is assigned a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale.

    Day 1

  • Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)

    Patient reported outcomes relating to knee pain and function (Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in sport and recreation (Sport/Rec) and knee related Quality of life (QOL)). KOOS consists of 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in sport and recreation (Sport/Rec) and knee related Quality of life (QOL). Standardized answer options are given (5 Likert boxes) and each question is assigned a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale.

    Week 6

  • Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)

    Patient reported outcomes relating to knee pain and function (Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in sport and recreation (Sport/Rec) and knee related Quality of life (QOL)). KOOS consists of 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in sport and recreation (Sport/Rec) and knee related Quality of life (QOL). Standardized answer options are given (5 Likert boxes) and each question is assigned a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale.

    Week 12

  • Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)

    Patient reported outcomes relating to knee pain and function (Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in sport and recreation (Sport/Rec) and knee related Quality of life (QOL)). KOOS consists of 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in sport and recreation (Sport/Rec) and knee related Quality of life (QOL). Standardized answer options are given (5 Likert boxes) and each question is assigned a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale.

    Week 52

  • EQ5D Score

    Patient reported outcomes relating to mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels (1-5): no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems.

    Day 0

  • EQ5D Score

    Patient reported outcomes relating to mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels (1-5): no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems.

    Day 1

  • EQ5D Score

    Patient reported outcomes relating to mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels (1-5): no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems.

    Week 6

  • EQ5D Score

    Patient reported outcomes relating to mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels (1-5): no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems.

    Week 12

  • EQ5D Score

    Patient reported outcomes relating to mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels (1-5): no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems.

    Week 52

  • VAS Score

    Patient reported outcomes relating to pain. Visual analog scale \[VAS\] is a measure of pain intensity. It is a continuous scale comprised of a horizontal (called horizontal visual analogue scale) or,vertical called vertical visual analog scale usually 10 cm or 100 mm length \[both the gradations are used\]. It is anchored by two verbal descriptors, one for each symptom extreme.For pain intensity, the scale is most commonly anchored by "no pain" (score of 0) and "pain as bad as it could be" or "worst imaginable pain" (score of 100 \[on 100-mm scale\].

    Day 0

  • VAS Score

    Patient reported outcomes relating to pain. Visual analog scale \[VAS\] is a measure of pain intensity. It is a continuous scale comprised of a horizontal (called horizontal visual analogue scale) or,vertical called vertical visual analog scale usually 10 cm or 100 mm length \[both the gradations are used\]. It is anchored by two verbal descriptors, one for each symptom extreme.For pain intensity, the scale is most commonly anchored by "no pain" (score of 0) and "pain as bad as it could be" or "worst imaginable pain" (score of 100 \[on 100-mm scale\].

    Day 1

  • VAS Score

    Patient reported outcomes relating to pain. Visual analog scale \[VAS\] is a measure of pain intensity. It is a continuous scale comprised of a horizontal (called horizontal visual analogue scale) or,vertical called vertical visual analog scale usually 10 cm or 100 mm length \[both the gradations are used\]. It is anchored by two verbal descriptors, one for each symptom extreme.For pain intensity, the scale is most commonly anchored by "no pain" (score of 0) and "pain as bad as it could be" or "worst imaginable pain" (score of 100 \[on 100-mm scale\].

    Week 6

  • VAS Score

    Patient reported outcomes relating to pain. Visual analog scale \[VAS\] is a measure of pain intensity. It is a continuous scale comprised of a horizontal (called horizontal visual analogue scale) or,vertical called vertical visual analog scale usually 10 cm or 100 mm length \[both the gradations are used\]. It is anchored by two verbal descriptors, one for each symptom extreme.For pain intensity, the scale is most commonly anchored by "no pain" (score of 0) and "pain as bad as it could be" or "worst imaginable pain" (score of 100 \[on 100-mm scale\].

    Week 12

  • VAS Score

    Patient reported outcomes relating to pain. Visual analog scale \[VAS\] is a measure of pain intensity. It is a continuous scale comprised of a horizontal (called horizontal visual analogue scale) or,vertical called vertical visual analog scale usually 10 cm or 100 mm length \[both the gradations are used\]. It is anchored by two verbal descriptors, one for each symptom extreme.For pain intensity, the scale is most commonly anchored by "no pain" (score of 0) and "pain as bad as it could be" or "worst imaginable pain" (score of 100 \[on 100-mm scale\].

    Week 52

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Safety outcome based on clinical assessment of the adverse events reported during the trial.

    Day 0

  • Safety outcome based on clinical assessment of the adverse events reported during the trial

    Day 1

  • Safety outcome based on clinical assessment of the adverse events reported during the trial

    Week 6

  • Safety outcome based on clinical assessment of the adverse events reported during the trial

    Week 12

  • Safety outcome based on clinical assessment of the adverse events reported during the trial

    Week 52

Study Arms (2)

No Bone Graft

OTHER

Open Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy with medial plate fixation (without bone grafting)

Device: DePuy Synthes TomoFix Medial High Tibial Plate (MHT) fixation (Standard of Care)

HydroxyColl Bone Graft Substitute

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Open Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy with medial plate fixation (with bone grafting) using Hydroxycoll bone graft substitute.

Device: HydroxyColl Bone Graft SubstituteDevice: DePuy Synthes TomoFix Medial High Tibial Plate (MHT) fixation (Standard of Care)

Interventions

The intervention involves the use of Open Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy with DePuy Synthes TomoFix Medial High Tibial Plate (MHT) fixation (Standard of Care) with the HydroxyColl bone graft substitute i.e. bone graft substitute vs. no bone graft substitute.

HydroxyColl Bone Graft Substitute

The intervention involves the use of Open Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy with DePuy Synthes TomoFix Medial High Tibial Plate (MHT) fixation (Standard of Care) without the HydroxyColl bone graft substitute i.e. bone graft substitute vs. no bone graft substitute.

HydroxyColl Bone Graft SubstituteNo Bone Graft

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Able to give written informed consent to participate in this study
  • Both male and females who will be admitted to the hospital for treatment of varus mis-alignment in medial unicompartmental osteoarthritis of the knee of the degree to which the surgeon deems it necessary to include a bone grafting procedure
  • Kellgren-Lawrence grade 1-4
  • Ability and willingness to comply with all study requirements

You may not qualify if:

  • History or presence of the following conditions: known sensitivity to bovine collagen or hydroxyapatite materials; diabetes, immune-compromised, vascular disease, metabolic/systemic bone disorder, osteomyelitis
  • Failure to provide written informed consent
  • Severe acute or chronic medical illness, including symptomatic cardiovascular disease
  • Weight less than 40 kilograms
  • Any clinically significant abnormality at the time of submission, in the judgement of the investigator would preclude safe completion of the study
  • Any use of estrogens, estrogen-progestin therapy, selective estrogens receptor modulators (SERMs) or calcitonin within 3 months, and use of bisphosphonates or recombinant PTH 1-34, 1-84 or other PTH fragments/analogues within the last 6 months
  • History of alcohol or drug abuse within the last year
  • History of non-compliance to medical regimens and/or patients who are considered potentially unreliable
  • Significant psychiatric disorder or behaviour
  • Presence of any concomitant condition which, in the opinion of the investigator or the sponsor, may interfere with the interpretation of efficacy and safety data gathered in this study including chronic infections
  • Chronic or \>7 days concomitant use of oral corticosteroids within 1 month prior to screening
  • Regular smoker (more than 10 cigarettes per day) for the last 12 months
  • Participation in another interventional orthopaedic clinical trial within 1 month of the beginning of this study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Basingstoke & North Hampshire Hospital

Basingstoke, United Kingdom

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis, KneeOsteoarthritis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ArthritisJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic Diseases

Study Officials

  • Michael Risebury, MA MBBS FRCS

    Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 3, 2018

First Posted

July 26, 2018

Study Start

April 30, 2018

Primary Completion

December 27, 2019

Study Completion

April 29, 2020

Last Updated

July 26, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-07

Locations