NCT03093077

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare implant kinematics of conventional mechanically aligned and anatomically aligned total knee arthroplasties (TKA) at 1 year post-operatively.

Trial Health

30
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2016

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 26, 2016

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2016

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 28, 2017

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 10, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 10, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

April 25, 2018

Status Verified

April 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

September 26, 2016

Last Update Submit

April 23, 2018

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Knee motion, as determined by 6 degree freedom of movement kinematics and associated joint proximity during the knee bend task.

    1 year post surgery

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Participants perception of knee function, as determined by the Knee injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)

    1 year post surgery

  • Participant's awareness of the joint implant, as determined by the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12)

    1 year post surgery

  • Knee joint and ambulatory function based on physical exam, as determined by the Knee Society Score (KSS)

    1 year post surgery

Study Arms (2)

Anatomic alignment

EXPERIMENTAL

The aim of anatomic alignment is to recreate an individual's pre-operative alignment using the DePuy ATTUNE total knee arthroplasty system.

Device: DePuy ATTUNE total knee arthroplasty system

Mechanical alignment

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The aim of mechanical alignment is to achieve a neutral mechanical alignment regardless of pre-operative status, using the DePuy ATTUNE total knee arthroplasty system.

Device: DePuy ATTUNE total knee arthroplasty system

Interventions

A standard midvastus approach will be used for both alignment technique groups. This is a standard approach for exposing the knee joint for TKA.

Anatomic alignmentMechanical alignment

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Males and females
  • Primary arthroplasty for treatment of osteoarthritis
  • Age between 40 and 80 years old
  • Willingness to provide written consent for study participation

You may not qualify if:

  • Revision arthroplasty
  • Pre-operative knee flexion lower than 90 degrees
  • Varus knee deformity greater than 15 degrees
  • Pre-operative valgus knee deformity
  • Presence of infections, highly communicable diseases or metastatic disease
  • Significant neurological or musculoskeletal disorders or disease that may interfere with normal gait or weight bearing
  • Congenital, developmental, or other bone disease or previous hip surgery that may, in the surgeon's judgment, interfere with total knee prosthesis survival or success
  • Presence of previous prosthetic knee or hip replacement device
  • BMI \> 40
  • Pregnant women

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Mayo Clinic in Rochester

Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis, Knee

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

OsteoarthritisArthritisJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic Diseases

Study Officials

  • Kristin D. Zhao, Ph.D.

    Mayo Clinic

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
0

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 26, 2016

First Posted

March 28, 2017

Study Start

November 1, 2016

Primary Completion

April 10, 2018

Study Completion

April 10, 2018

Last Updated

April 25, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-04

Locations