Optimization of the Bowel Preparation Regimen for the PillCam® COLON 2 Capsule Endoscopy Procedure
COVGIC20482: A Multicenter, Consecutive, Randomized Study to Optimize the Bowel Preparation Regimen for the PillCam COLON 2 Capsule Endoscopy Procedure
1 other identifier
interventional
122
1 country
6
Brief Summary
This study is designed to determine the optimal bowel preparation regimen for PillCam® COLON 2 Capsule Endoscopy System (CCE) procedures in average risk patients. Patients will be randomized to receive one of two bowel preparation regimens prior to PillCam CCE.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2015
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
6 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 19, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 25, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 11, 2016
CompletedMarch 7, 2017
June 1, 2015
8 months
May 19, 2015
March 6, 2016
January 22, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Bowel Cleansing Level of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam® Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE)
The primary endpoint is the bowel cleansing level, as determined by a standardized 4-point grading scale, assessed in total and by segment (cecum, ascending, transverse, descending/sigmoid, and rectum).
Within two weeks of study procedure
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Comparing Polyp Detection Rate of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam CCE
an expected average of 3 weeks from study procedure
Colonic Transit Time of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam CCE
an expected average of 3 weeks from study procedure
Comparing of Completion Rate of Capsule of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam CCE
an expected average of 3 weeks from study procedure
Excretion Rate of Capsule Within 12 Hours of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam CCE
an expected average of 3 weeks from study procedure
Adverse Events Rate Between Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam CCE
Adverse Events (AE) were collected starting from the screening visit and until 5-9 days following the PillCam procedure day.
Study Arms (2)
Bowel preparation regimen -Control
ACTIVE COMPARATORRegimen includes administration of: Drug: 4 Senna tablets 2 days before the procedure, Drug: 2-liters of polyethylene glycol (PEG) on the evening before the procedure Drug: 2-liters of PEG on the morning of the procedure, Drug:10mg Metoclopramide or 250 mg Erythromycin Drug: 2 SUPREP oral sulfate solution Drug: 10mg Bisacodyl suppository.
Bowel preparation regimen-Test
EXPERIMENTALRegimen includes administration of: Drug: 4 Senna tablets 2 days before the procedure, Drug: 2-liters of PEG on the evening before the procedure Drug: 2-liters of PEG on the morning of the procedure, Drug:10mg Metoclopramide or 250 mg Erythromycin Drug: 2 SUPREP oral sulfate solution with Gastrografin Drug: 10mg Bisacodyl suppository.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subject is between 50 and 75 years of age.
- Subject is classified as average risk per the American Gastroenterological Association Guidelines on Colorectal Cancer Screening: Individuals without a personal or family history of colorectal cancer (CRC) or adenomas, inflammatory bowel disease, or high-risk genetic syndromes.
- Subject is willing and able to participate in the study procedures and to understand and sign the informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Subject with history of polyps (including those identified by computed tomography \[CT\], optical colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, etc.).
- Subject with history of negative colon assessment (including CT, optical colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy etc.) within 5 years as these subjects would be defined not requiring screening in this time frame.
- Subject with suspected or diagnosed with hematochezia, melena, iron deficiency with or without anemia, or any other rectal bleeding, including positive fecal occult blood test of any variety.
- Subject with any condition believed to have an increased risk of capsule retention such as suspected or known bowel obstruction, stricture, or fistula.
- Subject with dysphagia or any swallowing disorder.
- Subject with serious medical conditions that would increase the risk associated with capsule or colonoscopy that are so severe that screening would have no benefit.
- Subject with a cardiac pacemaker or other implanted electromedical device.
- Subject expected to undergo MRI examination within 7 days after ingestion of the capsule.
- Subject with clinical evidence of renal disease, including clinically significant laboratory abnormalities of renal function within the past 6 months, or at any time in the past if not tested within the last 6 months, defined as creatinine, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and/or glomerular filtration rate (GFR) outside of the local laboratory reference range.
- Subject with known gastrointestinal motility disorders.
- Subject with allergies or known contraindication to the medications or preparation agents used in the procedure as described in the relevant instructions for use.
- Subject with comorbidities which, in the opinion of the investigator, will not be appropriate for the study or the subject has an estimated life expectancy of less than 6 months.
- Subject is considered to be part of a vulnerable population (e.g. prisoners or those without sufficient mental capacity).
- Subject is pregnant, suspected pregnant, or is actively breast-feeding. Females of child-bearing potential will be required to provide either a urine pregnancy test or serum pregnancy test as part of the participant's standard of care regardless of their participation in the study (except for subjects who are surgically sterile or are post-menopausal for at least two years).
- Subject has participated in an investigational drug or device research study within 30 days of enrollment that may interfere with the subject's safety or ability to participate in this study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Medtronic - MITGlead
Study Sites (6)
Pinnacle Research Group, LLC
Anniston, Alabama, 36207, United States
Indiana University Hospital
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, United States
Indianapolis Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46237, United States
Dayton Gastroenterology
Dayton, Ohio, 45440, United States
Thomas Jefferson University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107, United States
Franklin Gastroenterology, PLLC
Franklin, Tennessee, 37067, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Liron Bar Yaakov
- Organization
- Given Imaging (a Medtronic company)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Douglas K Rex, Dr.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 19, 2015
First Posted
June 25, 2015
Study Start
May 1, 2015
Primary Completion
January 1, 2016
Study Completion
February 1, 2016
Last Updated
March 7, 2017
Results First Posted
July 11, 2016
Record last verified: 2015-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share