Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography Randomization for Graft Optimization Trial
FARGO
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
3
Brief Summary
The FARGO trial is a prospective, randomized (1:1), multicenter study. The aim of the study is to assess the importance of fractional flow reserve (FFR) assessment prior to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with respect to planning and guiding the revascularization strategy. The study compares an FFR-guided strategy to an angiography-guided strategy in patients planned for surgical revascularization.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable coronary-artery-disease
Started Jun 2014
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 19, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 22, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2016
CompletedOctober 18, 2018
October 1, 2018
2.5 years
January 19, 2015
October 16, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage open grafts of all grafts
Open graft definition: graft with TIMI III flow with no anastomosis stenosis (TIMI flow grades based on results of the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction trial)
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Graft stenosis (shaft and anastomoses)
6 months
Change in CCS class from index to follow-up (FU)
6 months
Change in Quality of life (EQ-5D) from index to FU
6 months
MACCE (Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular event: death, myocardial infarction, stroke, new revascularization by CABG or PCI (Percutaneous coronary intervention)
6 months
Procedural maximum Troponin I (cTnI), Troponin T (TnT) or creatinine kinase MB (CKMB) values depending on local conditions.
The first 24 hours after the operation
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Fractional flow reserve-guided CABG
EXPERIMENTALPatients are randomized to an FFR-guided CABG. FFR-measurements are made on coronary arteries with intermediate stenoses, that are planned for grafting. The FFR-values are blinded for both the operator, the patient and the heart team meeting. The graft plan form the heart team meeting are changed by the study investigator according to the FFR-measurements and randomization, so that coronary arteries with FFR ≤ 0,8 receive grafting and coronary arteries with FFR \> 0,8 are deferred.
Angiography-guided CABG
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients are randomized to an angiography-guided CABG. FFR-measurements are made on coronary arteries with intermediate stenoses, that are planned for grafting. The FFR-values are blinded for both the operator, the patient and the heart team meeting. The graft plan are based on the coronary angiography.
Interventions
Coronary arteries with angiographical significant stenoses, that are planned for grafting at the heart team meeting and where FFR-measurements are made, only receive grafting if FFR-value is ≤ 0,8. Arteries with FFR-values \> 0,8 are deferred.
Coronary arteries with angiographical significant stenoses, that are planned for grafting at the heart team meeting all receive grafting. FFR-measurements are still made, but not used for guidance of grafting.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Stable angina or unstable angina / NSTEMI (Non ST segment elevation myocardial infarction) candidate to CABG
- At least one study lesion, which is an intermediate lesion planned for grafting at the Heart Team Meeting.(Definition of Study lesions: ≥ 50% stenosis of a major epicardiel artery (where the proximal reference segment has a diameter\> 2.5 mm), which can be passed with a FFR-wire without significant risk. Study Lesions can be drawn from all coronary arteries.)
- Signed informed consent form
You may not qualify if:
- Significant valvular disease with indication to surgical treatment
- Previous open-heart-surgery
- Left main lesion without other intermediate lesions
- Treatment with Persantin Retard
- One vessel disease
- Renal impairment (creatinine ≥ 150 umol / l)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
Department of Cardiology and Cardiothoracic surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby Sygehus
Aarhus, Aarhus N, 8200, Denmark
Anne Langhoff Thuesen
Odense, Odense C, 5000, Denmark
Department of Cardiology and Cardiothoracic surgery, Aalborg University Hospital
Aalborg, 9100, Denmark
Related Publications (2)
Thuesen AL, Riber LP, Veien KT, Christiansen EH, Jensen SE, Modrau I, Andreasen JJ, Borregaard B, Junker A, Mortensen PE, Jensen LO. Health-Related Quality of Life and Angina in Fractional Flow Reserve- Versus Angiography-Guided Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: FARGO Trial (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography Randomization for Graft Optimization). Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2021 Jun;14(6):e007302. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.007302. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
PMID: 34078097DERIVEDThuesen AL, Riber LP, Veien KT, Christiansen EH, Jensen SE, Modrau I, Andreasen JJ, Junker A, Mortensen PE, Jensen LO. Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiographically-Guided Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Dec 4;72(22):2732-2743. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.043.
PMID: 30497559DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Anne Langhoff Thuesen, MD
Department of Cardio-thoracic surgery, Odense University Hospital
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Lisette Okkels Jensen, MD,PhD,DMSc
Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital
- STUDY CHAIR
Per Thayssen, MD, DMSc
Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital
- STUDY CHAIR
Poul Erik Mortensen, MD
Department of Cardio-thoracic surgery, Odense University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 19, 2015
First Posted
June 22, 2015
Study Start
June 1, 2014
Primary Completion
December 1, 2016
Study Completion
December 1, 2016
Last Updated
October 18, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-10