Comparison Between Immediate and Gradual Decannulation
Feasibility and Safety of Immediate Versus Gradual Decannulation: a Randomised Control Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The investigators propose to examine the feasibility and safety of immediate (single stage) decannulation in adult patients in a controlled randomized trial. Patients who will be found fit for decannulation after an otolaryngologist and intensive care specialist assessment will be randomized into two groups: immediate decannulation and gradual decrease in cannula size. Both groups of patients will be monitored after decannulation and in the outpatient clinic for any complications following the procedure.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2015
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 4, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 12, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2019
CompletedMarch 3, 2017
February 1, 2017
3 years
June 4, 2015
February 28, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
re-insertion of the tracheostomy tube
number of patients who needed re-insertion of the tracheostomy tube due to respiratory distress within 7 days of decannulation
7 days
mechanical ventilation
number of patients who needed mechanical ventilation due to respiratory distress within 7 days of decannulation
7 days
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Death from any cause
90 days
Respiratory distress
up to 90 fays following decannulation
Pneumonia
90 days following decannulation
Study Arms (2)
immediate decannulation
OTHERIn the immediate decannulation group - the tracheostomy tube is removed and the patient would be monitored overnight in an intermediate monitored unit. On the next day a clinical evaluation would be held, and the patient would be discharge or transferred to his department according to the clinical course of the patient
Gradual tracheostomy tube decrease
OTHERIn the gradual decannulation group The tracheostomy tube will be reduced in 2 sizes compared with the initial inner diameter of the tube. The patients will remain with the reduced tube for 48 hours, and the tube will be removed if the patients would meet pre-decannulation evaluation
Interventions
patients in the immediate decannulation group would be admitted for an overnight in intensive care unit or the otolaryngology department. they would be monitored for any respiratory or airway complications.
After an overnight observation, patients in the immediate decannulation group would would undergo clinical and laboratory evaluation including vital signs and blood gases.
all patients would visit the otolaryngology outpatient clinic in 7, 30 and 90 days following decannulation for an evaluation of any respiratory complications following decannulation
The tracheostomy tube will be reduced in 2 sizes compared with the initial inner diameter of the tube. The patients will remain with the reduced tube for 48 hours, and the tube will be removed if the patients would meet pre-decannulation evaluation
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients who underwent tracheostomy with the following conditions:
- Tracheostomy tract is established more than 7 days
- Normal vital signs: heart rate 50-100, 90\<systolic BP \<180, respiratory rate \<20. Saturation \>90% in room air
- Effective cough
- Normal swallows \\ feeding possibility
- \# steps endoscopy test: through the tracheostomy tube, normal naso-laryngeal and through the tract with an upper look towards the subglottic area in order to detect subglottic stenosis.
- Ability of the patient to breath with a capped cannula.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with a major complication in tracheostomy procedure (subcutaneous emphysema, pneumothorax, bleeding, false root)
- patient with anatomical neck abnormality
- Pregnant women
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Kaplan Medical Centerlead
- Soroka University Medical Centercollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Kaplan medical center
Rehovot, Rehovot, Israel
Related Publications (8)
Epstein SK. Anatomy and physiology of tracheostomy. Respir Care. 2005 Apr;50(4):476-82.
PMID: 15807905BACKGROUNDDelaney A, Bagshaw SM, Nalos M. Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy versus surgical tracheostomy in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2006;10(2):R55. doi: 10.1186/cc4887.
PMID: 16606435BACKGROUNDPierson DJ. Tracheostomy and weaning. Respir Care. 2005 Apr;50(4):526-33.
PMID: 15807916BACKGROUNDChristopher KL. Tracheostomy decannulation. Respir Care. 2005 Apr;50(4):538-41.
PMID: 15807918BACKGROUNDHeffner JE. The technique of weaning from tracheostomy. Criteria for weaning; practical measures to prevent failure. J Crit Illn. 1995 Oct;10(10):729-33.
PMID: 10155745BACKGROUNDLewarski JS. Long-term care of the patient with a tracheostomy. Respir Care. 2005 Apr;50(4):534-7.
PMID: 15807917BACKGROUNDMitchell RB, Hussey HM, Setzen G, Jacobs IN, Nussenbaum B, Dawson C, Brown CA 3rd, Brandt C, Deakins K, Hartnick C, Merati A. Clinical consensus statement: tracheostomy care. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Jan;148(1):6-20. doi: 10.1177/0194599812460376. Epub 2012 Sep 18.
PMID: 22990518RESULTDe Leyn P, Bedert L, Delcroix M, Depuydt P, Lauwers G, Sokolov Y, Van Meerhaeghe A, Van Schil P; Belgian Association of Pneumology and Belgian Association of Cardiothoracic Surgery. Tracheotomy: clinical review and guidelines. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007 Sep;32(3):412-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.05.018. Epub 2007 Jun 27.
PMID: 17588767RESULT
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nili Segal, Dr
Soroka hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr Oded Cohen
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 4, 2015
First Posted
June 12, 2015
Study Start
June 1, 2015
Primary Completion
June 1, 2018
Study Completion
January 1, 2019
Last Updated
March 3, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-02