Clinical Assessment of New Speaking Valve With Heat and Moisture Exchanger (HME) for Tracheotomized Patients
Phase 2 Clinical Feasibility Study of a New Speaking Valve With a Heat- and Moisture Exchanger (TW) for Tracheotomized Patients.
1 other identifier
interventional
16
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This clinical investigation addresses the performance of a re-designed The current study aims to investigate the next version of the TW speaking valve, in combination with both a 15mm and 22mm HME cassette.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2013
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 17, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 6, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 11, 2017
CompletedAugust 11, 2017
August 1, 2017
6 months
October 17, 2013
January 30, 2017
August 10, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Evaluate Patient Experiences Associated With Exposure to the Speaking Valve With a Heat- and Moisture Exchanger (TW) for Tracheotomized Patients Based on Results From Questionnaires.
Patients were asked to use either the old TW15 and the TW22 HME device for a week, data combined for the two devices (the device used was recorded). After each week, patients completed a device specific questionnaire (Borg Scale). After the re-design (ie Updated speaking valve), patients were asked to use the new Speaking Valve for a week and then to complete relevant sections of the same questionnaire. Both at baseline and in the follow-up, patients were asked about their breathing using a Borg scale at a particular moment. This scale has a range from 0-6 where a score close to "0" indicates less breathing problems.
3 weeks including Baseline, week 1, 2 (old device) and week 3 (updated device).
Hours of HME Use Per Day.
The mean number of hours of TW use per 24 hours was calculated.
Weeks 1 and 2 (Old device, data averaged) and Week 3 (Updated device)
Device Preference Rating.
Patients were asked to rate the devices on a scale from 0-10, where "10" indicates the best score and "0" the worst score. The overall mean satisfaction with the speaking valve was rated.
Weeks 1 and 2 (Old device, data averaged) and Week 3 (Updated device)
Study Arms (1)
TW speaking valve/HME
EXPERIMENTALUse of the TW speaking valve/HME
Interventions
The TW speaking valve with HME will be used during the day, whereas during sleep patients will use an HME without an automatic speaking valve. Data from TW15 and TW22 will be combined.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years or older
- has a tracheostomy
- is spontaneously breathing
- has a cuffless tracheostomy tube
- has a tracheostomy tube with inner and outer cannula
- currently uses an HME and/or speaking valve
You may not qualify if:
- patient unable to handle or remove the device him/herself when needed, e.g. has decreased level of cognition or reduced mobility of the arms and/or hands
- is mechanically ventilated in any way
- has a tidal volume of less than 100 ml
- is suffering from severe aspiration
- is laryngectomized: the device will block the possibility to exhale if speaking mode is unintentionally activated
- has severe upper airway obstruction, this may cause air trapping
- has thick and copious secretions which might block the device
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Atos Medical ABlead
Study Sites (1)
University Medical Center Groningen
Groningen, 9700RB, Netherlands
Limitations and Caveats
small sample size;
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Prof. Dr. Bernard F.A.M. van der Laan, PhD, MD
- Organization
- University Medical Center Groningen and University of Groningen
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Bernardus FA van der Laan, PhD, MD
University Medical Center Groningen
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 17, 2013
First Posted
November 6, 2013
Study Start
October 1, 2013
Primary Completion
April 1, 2014
Study Completion
April 1, 2014
Last Updated
August 11, 2017
Results First Posted
August 11, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
Anonymous (de-identified) patient data will be used for publication, expected 2016.