NCT01976819

Brief Summary

This clinical investigation addresses the performance of a re-designed The current study aims to investigate the next version of the TW speaking valve, in combination with both a 15mm and 22mm HME cassette.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
16

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2013

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2013

Completed
16 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 17, 2013

Completed
20 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 6, 2013

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2014

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2014

Completed
3.4 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

August 11, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

August 11, 2017

Status Verified

August 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

October 17, 2013

Results QC Date

January 30, 2017

Last Update Submit

August 10, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

TracheotomyTracheostomySpeaking valveHMEpatients

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Evaluate Patient Experiences Associated With Exposure to the Speaking Valve With a Heat- and Moisture Exchanger (TW) for Tracheotomized Patients Based on Results From Questionnaires.

    Patients were asked to use either the old TW15 and the TW22 HME device for a week, data combined for the two devices (the device used was recorded). After each week, patients completed a device specific questionnaire (Borg Scale). After the re-design (ie Updated speaking valve), patients were asked to use the new Speaking Valve for a week and then to complete relevant sections of the same questionnaire. Both at baseline and in the follow-up, patients were asked about their breathing using a Borg scale at a particular moment. This scale has a range from 0-6 where a score close to "0" indicates less breathing problems.

    3 weeks including Baseline, week 1, 2 (old device) and week 3 (updated device).

  • Hours of HME Use Per Day.

    The mean number of hours of TW use per 24 hours was calculated.

    Weeks 1 and 2 (Old device, data averaged) and Week 3 (Updated device)

  • Device Preference Rating.

    Patients were asked to rate the devices on a scale from 0-10, where "10" indicates the best score and "0" the worst score. The overall mean satisfaction with the speaking valve was rated.

    Weeks 1 and 2 (Old device, data averaged) and Week 3 (Updated device)

Study Arms (1)

TW speaking valve/HME

EXPERIMENTAL

Use of the TW speaking valve/HME

Device: TW speaking valve/HME

Interventions

The TW speaking valve with HME will be used during the day, whereas during sleep patients will use an HME without an automatic speaking valve. Data from TW15 and TW22 will be combined.

Also known as: DualCare speaking valve/HME
TW speaking valve/HME

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • years or older
  • has a tracheostomy
  • is spontaneously breathing
  • has a cuffless tracheostomy tube
  • has a tracheostomy tube with inner and outer cannula
  • currently uses an HME and/or speaking valve

You may not qualify if:

  • patient unable to handle or remove the device him/herself when needed, e.g. has decreased level of cognition or reduced mobility of the arms and/or hands
  • is mechanically ventilated in any way
  • has a tidal volume of less than 100 ml
  • is suffering from severe aspiration
  • is laryngectomized: the device will block the possibility to exhale if speaking mode is unintentionally activated
  • has severe upper airway obstruction, this may cause air trapping
  • has thick and copious secretions which might block the device

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University Medical Center Groningen

Groningen, 9700RB, Netherlands

Location

Limitations and Caveats

small sample size;

Results Point of Contact

Title
Prof. Dr. Bernard F.A.M. van der Laan, PhD, MD
Organization
University Medical Center Groningen and University of Groningen

Study Officials

  • Bernardus FA van der Laan, PhD, MD

    University Medical Center Groningen

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 17, 2013

First Posted

November 6, 2013

Study Start

October 1, 2013

Primary Completion

April 1, 2014

Study Completion

April 1, 2014

Last Updated

August 11, 2017

Results First Posted

August 11, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Anonymous (de-identified) patient data will be used for publication, expected 2016.

Locations