Coping Effectiveness Training in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure
1 other identifier
interventional
103
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of the present study is to develop, implement and evaluate a stress management program aiming to improve emotional well-being, health-related quality of life and to reduce readmission to hospital in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). Method: A randomized controlled study design will be employed in which the intervention consists of Coping Effectiveness Training (CET), a manual-based group intervention based on a cognitive transactional theory of stress and coping. The purpose of CET is to improve skills to appraise stress, teach a number of techniques to cope with stress, and to give an opportunity to interact with other people with similar experiences of living with CHF. The control group will receive standard health care. The intervention group will receive seven weekly sessions of CET. Self-assessments of; emotional well-being, depression and anxiety, illness perception, health-related quality of life, coping strategies and social support will be performed before the intervention, directly after the intervention, six weeks, six months and one year after the intervention period as well as measuring readmission to hospital. In addition, the participants in the intervention group will fill in an anonymous written evaluation, with closed and open ended questions, directly after the intervention.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable heart-failure
Started Mar 2011
Typical duration for not_applicable heart-failure
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 13, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 4, 2015
CompletedJune 8, 2015
June 1, 2015
3.8 years
March 13, 2015
June 4, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Emotional well-being (Composite measure of positive and negative affect)
As measured by self-assessment questionnaire PANAS. Analysis will be conducted with Repeated measures ANCOVA.
Change from baseline to directly after, 6 weeks, 6 months and 1 year after intervention
Depression and anxiety (Composite measure)
As measured by self-assessment questionnaire HADS. Analysis will be conducted with Repeated measures ANCOVA.
Change from baseline to directly after, 6 weeks, 6 months and 1 year after intervention
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Health-related quality of life (Composite measure)
Change from baseline directly after, 6 weeks, 6 months and 1 year after intervention
Other Outcomes (1)
Readmission to hospital
During the entire follow-up period, mean follow-up time an average of 3 years (median) but at least 1 year. From start of the first intervention group to end of study-date.
Study Arms (2)
Coping effectiveness Training (CET)
EXPERIMENTALThe intervention consists of Coping Effectiveness Training (CET), a manual-based group intervention based on a cognitive transactional theory of stress and coping. The purpose of CET is to improve skills to appraise stress, teach a number of techniques to cope with stress, and to give an opportunity to interact with other people with similar experiences of living with CHF. The CET program will, in this study, be modified for patients with CHF. The intervention consists of seven, 90-minute weekly sessions led by a nurse with a Masters degree in nursing science and extensive experience in heart failure care in collaboration with a professional psychologist. Each group consisted of 8 to 12 patients.
Control
NO INTERVENTIONThe control group will receive standard health care and will not take part of the intervention.
Interventions
The participants in the intervention group will receive a work book explaining the theme and home assignment as well as providing a brief summary of every group session. The group leader has a manual. Both work book and manual have been translated to Swedish and adjusted to patients with chronic heart failure.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients diagnosed with CHF hospitalized at a heart failure ward or a heart failure outpatient clinic in Stockholm County Council, Sweden, are classified in NYHA-class II-III and are aged over 18 years.
You may not qualify if:
- Cognitive dysfunction
- life threatening disease such as cancer or primary organ failure and/or severe psychiatric diagnosis such as psychosis or severe depression, and
- not being able to understand the Swedish language.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Karolinska Institutetlead
- Swedish Red Cross University Collegecollaborator
Related Publications (8)
Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Jun;54(6):1063-70. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063.
PMID: 3397865BACKGROUNDZigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x.
PMID: 6880820BACKGROUNDCarver CS. You want to measure coping but your protocol's too long: consider the brief COPE. Int J Behav Med. 1997;4(1):92-100. doi: 10.1207/s15327558ijbm0401_6.
PMID: 16250744BACKGROUNDBroadbent E, Petrie KJ, Main J, Weinman J. The brief illness perception questionnaire. J Psychosom Res. 2006 Jun;60(6):631-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2005.10.020.
PMID: 16731240BACKGROUNDBerkman LF, Blumenthal J, Burg M, Carney RM, Catellier D, Cowan MJ, Czajkowski SM, DeBusk R, Hosking J, Jaffe A, Kaufmann PG, Mitchell P, Norman J, Powell LH, Raczynski JM, Schneiderman N; Enhancing Recovery in Coronary Heart Disease Patients Investigators (ENRICHD). Effects of treating depression and low perceived social support on clinical events after myocardial infarction: the Enhancing Recovery in Coronary Heart Disease Patients (ENRICHD) Randomized Trial. JAMA. 2003 Jun 18;289(23):3106-16. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.23.3106.
PMID: 12813116BACKGROUNDHays RD, Sherbourne CD, Mazel RM. The RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0. Health Econ. 1993 Oct;2(3):217-27. doi: 10.1002/hec.4730020305.
PMID: 8275167BACKGROUNDChesney MA, Folkman S. Psychological impact of HIV disease and implications for intervention. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 1994 Mar;17(1):163-82.
PMID: 8190663BACKGROUNDLazarus, R.S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal and coping. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Fredrik Saboonchi, Professor
Swedish Red Cross University College
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 13, 2015
First Posted
June 4, 2015
Study Start
March 1, 2011
Primary Completion
December 1, 2014
Study Completion
December 1, 2014
Last Updated
June 8, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-06