NCT02458001

Brief Summary

Women affected by gynaecologic cancers are often not aware of sexual consequences of cancer and its treatment. Most do not receive appropriate advice or help to recover sexual function, and the impact on their sexuality may be profound. Despite this several potential therapies can be effective in helping recovery. A major challenge is informing and involving the patients in an appropriate and sensitive manner, and a further issue is the delivery of such therapies in busy and medically driven gynaecologic oncology clinics. It will use and adapt existing evidence based therapies for improving sexual function after cancer treatment and develop a model for delivering these in the NHS (United Kingdom National Health Service) setting. The model of 'stepped care' is adapted from that used nationally and successfully in the Increasing Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) programme. Assessment allows for 'stepping up and down', i.e. calibrating the type of help a woman receives according to need and her response to treatment already given.This study will develop and evaluate a 'stepped' system of interventions using elements of best available evidence, adapting existing interventions to help women recover their sexual feelings and activity, starting with simple methods, moving on to new talking treatments for more complex cases. The investigators address all gynaecologic cancers on the principle that sexual difficulty is the problem the investigators are treating, not the cancer of origin. Ongoing clinical assessment will be vital for the success of the stepped care model. The investigators will deliver training and supervision to enhance the skills needed by the Clinical Nursing Specialist (CNS). An important part of this study will be characterising the range of women and their willingness to participate in psychosexual help. One-to-one follow up interviews will inform the level of input required for any subsequent Randomised Control Trial (RCT). The investigators will use internationally recognised rating scales for rating sexual function, assess how illness and treatment affect mood and self esteem. The investigators will also measure the overall cost-effectiveness to the public sector of providing this treatment, compared to costs of subsequent use of health and social services. This pilot study will assess the feasibility of conducting a full scale investigation of a stepped therapy and indicate the potential benefits to the patients, their partners, and to the NHS generally.

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2015

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 20, 2015

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 29, 2015

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2015

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

May 29, 2015

Status Verified

May 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

1.7 years

First QC Date

March 20, 2015

Last Update Submit

May 28, 2015

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Rate of recruitment

    measure of feasibility

    24 months

  • Consent rate to randomization and treatment

    measure of feasibility

    24 months

  • Proportion of women stepping up from level 1 to 2, and level 2 to 3

    measure of feasibility

    24 months

  • Proportion of women dropping out of therapy

    measure of feasibility

    24 months

  • Number of usable data points from all measures at all time points

    measure of feasibility

    24 months

  • Proportion of women lost to follow-up on trial measures

    measure of feasibility

    24 months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI)

    24 months

Study Arms (2)

SAFFRON stepped care

EXPERIMENTAL

3 level intervention: level 1:Self help booklet level 2: CNS delivered intervention level 3: psychologist delivered intervention

Behavioral: SAFFRON stepped care

enhanced treatment as usual (ETU)

NO INTERVENTION

level 1 intervention: self help booklet Non study trained CNS will offer assessment, advice, vaginal dilator training where appropriate, arrange topical oestrogens or other creams

Interventions

Behavioral: SAFFRON stepped care Stepped care (Improving Access to Psychological Therapies, 2012; Richards et al., 2012) adapted for the gynaecological cancer setting to produce a 3-step model including a clinical assessment and treatment algorithm. Assessment Algorithm FSFI Interventions Level 1: Best available self-help literature on psychosexual difficulties after cancer as judged by the project team and two patient advocates. Level 2: A 3-5 session manualised psycho-educational intervention delivered fortnightly by study trained CNSs with taping and supervision for adherence to protocol and manual. Level 3: 16 weekly session manualised brief psychotherapy adaptation of InterPersonal Therapy, IPT (Interpersonal Psychotherapy for Sexual Adjustment post Gynaecological Cancer, IPT-APGyC)

SAFFRON stepped care

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Women over 18 (with partners at their choice) treated for any gynaecological malignancy with surgery and/or chemotherapy and/or radiation at UCLH (University College London Hospitals) Gynaecological Cancer Centre or University Hospitals Bristol Gynaecological Cancer Centre
  • months minimum post end of treatment
  • any sexual orientation
  • with sexual function difficulties identified by initial screen (3 clinical questions within clinical interview posed by doctor or nurse)

You may not qualify if:

  • Poor English
  • Current drug or alcohol abuse
  • Current sexual therapy or psychotherapy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (1)

  • Gessler S, King M, Lemma A, Barber J, Jones L, Dunning S, Madden V, Pilling S, Hunter R, Fonagy P, Summerville K, MacDonald N, Olaitan A, Lanceley A. Stepped approach to improving sexual function after gynaecological cancer: the SAFFRON feasibility RCT. Health Technol Assess. 2019 Feb;23(6):1-92. doi: 10.3310/hta23060.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsOvarian NeoplasmsUterine NeoplasmsVaginal NeoplasmsVulvar NeoplasmsSexual Dysfunctions, Psychological

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Genital Neoplasms, FemaleUrogenital NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsUterine Cervical DiseasesUterine DiseasesGenital Diseases, FemaleFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesGenital DiseasesEndocrine Gland NeoplasmsOvarian DiseasesAdnexal DiseasesEndocrine System DiseasesGonadal DisordersVaginal DiseasesVulvar DiseasesMental Disorders

Study Officials

  • Susan F Gessler, PhD

    University College, London

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Susan F Gessler, PhD

CONTACT

Anne Lanceley, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 20, 2015

First Posted

May 29, 2015

Study Start

July 1, 2015

Primary Completion

March 1, 2017

Study Completion

March 1, 2017

Last Updated

May 29, 2015

Record last verified: 2015-05