A Study Comparing Two Carboplatin Containing Regimens for Children and Young Adults With Previously Untreated Low Grade Glioma
A Phase III Study Comparing Two Carboplatin Containing Regimens for Children and Young Adults With Previously Untreated Low Grade Glioma
1 other identifier
interventional
95
1 country
21
Brief Summary
This study is trying to learn and understand if the chemotherapy drug called carboplatin works as well as the standard therapy. The standard therapy for Low Grade Glioma (LGG) in children and young adults is using a combination of carboplatin and vincristine. Studies in children have shown that the use of carboplatin alone has promise of being just as effective for treating LGG as standard therapy. Additionally, this study will try to understand if treatment with carboplatin alone is associated with an improved quality of life for LGG patients and their families.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Mar 2015
Longer than P75 for phase_3
21 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 13, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 27, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 31, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 30, 2025
CompletedNovember 26, 2024
November 1, 2024
10.5 years
April 13, 2015
November 22, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Progression-free survival
To compare the progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with previously untreated LGG among patients with and without NF1 utilizing carboplatin/vincristine (standard of care) vs single agent carboplatin (research).
3 years
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Number of participants who experience improved quality of life as assessed by a Quality of Life questionnaire.
week-6, week-12, month-6, month-12
Tumor response rate of each regimen, assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
3 years
Number of participants who experience toxicity on each regimen
3 years
Number of B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase (BRAF) mutations that have an association with clinical outcomes.
3 years
Number of aberrations found through whole exome and ribonucleic acid (RNA) sequencing that coordinate with a clinical outcome.
3 years
Study Arms (2)
Carboplatine and Vincristine
ACTIVE COMPARATORInduction: 10 weeks of Carboplatin and Vincristine therapy. Carboplatin 175 mg/m2 give an an IV infusion weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10. Vincristine 1.5mg/m2 (0.05 mg/kg if child less than 12 kg) (maximum dose 2.0 mg) give as an IV bolus infusion on weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10. Maintenance: Maintenance consists of 8, 6-week cycles of chemotherapy. It begins week 12 of Induction or when peripheral counts recover with ANC \>1,000/µL and platelet count \>100,000/µL. Each cycle will consist of 4 weekly doses of carboplatin, three weekly doses of vincristine (given concomitantly with the first 3 weeks of carboplatin), followed by two weeks of rest for a total of 6 weeks. Maintenance will continue for a total of 8 cycles. Carboplatin 175 mg/m2 as an IV continuous infusion over 60 minutes on Week 1, 2, 3, 4 of each cycle. Vincristine 1.5 mg/m2 (0.05 mg/ kg for children \<12 kg) (maximum dose 2.0 mg) IV bolus infusion on Week 1, 2, 3 of each cycle.
Carboplatin alone
EXPERIMENTALCarboplatin is given once every four weeks, Each 4-week period is considered a cycle. Regimen B will last for 13 cycles which is equivalent to one year (52 weeks). Carboplatin 560 mg/m2 (or 19 mg/kg for children weighing less than 12 kg) IV over 1 hour every 4 weeks
Interventions
Carboplatin 175 mg/m2 IV infusion Vincristine 1.5mg/m2 IV
Carboplatin 560 mg/m2 (or 19 mg/kg for children weighing less than 12 kg) IV
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Tumor Diagnosis: Low grade gliomas
- Patients must be less than 21 years of age at study entry.
- Central nervous system tumor. Patients with primary spinal cord lesions. Patients with metastatic disease are also allowed.
- No previous therapy for the tumor with the exception of corticosteroids and surgery.
- Performance status:Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS for \> 16 yrs of age) or Lansky Performance Score (LPS for ≤ 16 years of age) ≥ 50 assessed within two weeks prior to registration
- Seizure disorder should be well controlled.
- Normal organ and marrow function
- Female patients of childbearing potential must not be pregnant or breast-feeding. Female patients who have menstruated and are of childbearing potential must have a negative serum or urine pregnancy test prior to enrollment.
- Patients of childbearing or child fathering potential must be willing to use a medically acceptable form of birth control, which includes abstinence, while being treated on this study and for 6 months after the last drug administration.
- Ability of subject or parent/guardian to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent/assent document. Informed consent/assent must be signed prior to registration on this study.
- Tissue blocks or slides must be sent. If tissue is unavailable, the study chair must be notified prior to enrollment.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who are receiving any other investigational or chemotherapeutic agents will be excluded.
- Patients with known inability to return for follow-up visits or obtain follow-up studies required to assess for toxicity to therapy.
- Patients with Subepenydmal Giant Cell Astrocytomas are excluded. Patients with intrinsic brainstem tumors of the pons will be excluded from the study.
- History of hypersensitivity reactions attributed to compounds of similar chemical or biologic composition to platinum based chemotherapy.
- Patients with uncontrolled inter-current illness are excluded.
- Females who are pregnant or breast feeding are excluded.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Alicia Lenzenlead
Study Sites (21)
Phoenix Children's Hospital
Phoenix, Arizona, 85016, United States
Rady Children's Hospital
San Diego, California, 92123, United States
Yale University
New Haven, Connecticut, 06520, United States
Orlando Health, Inc.
Orlando, Florida, 32806, United States
Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hosptial of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States
St. Vincent Peyton Manning Children's Hospital
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46260, United States
University of Iowa
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, United States
The Johns Hopkins Hospital
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287, United States
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States
University of Michigan, C.S. Mott Children's Hospital
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109-5652, United States
Children's Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota - Minneapolis
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55404, United States
Saint Louis University at SSM Cardinal Glennon Children's Medical Center
St Louis, Missouri, 63103-2006, United States
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, 63110-1010, United States
Albany Medical Center
Albany, New York, 12208-3479, United States
Duke University Medical School
Durham, North Carolina, 27705-4682, United States
Children's Hospital Medical Center of Akron
Akron, Ohio, 44308-1062, United States
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45229, United States
Nationwide Children's Hospital
Columbus, Ohio, 43205, United States
Dayton Children's Hospital
Dayton, Ohio, 45404-1815, United States
American Family Children's Hospital
Madison, Wisconsin, 53792, United States
Medical College of Wiscosin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226, United States
Related Publications (18)
Sievert AJ, Fisher MJ. Pediatric low-grade gliomas. J Child Neurol. 2009 Nov;24(11):1397-408. doi: 10.1177/0883073809342005.
PMID: 19841428BACKGROUNDGururangan S, Cavazos CM, Ashley D, Herndon JE 2nd, Bruggers CS, Moghrabi A, Scarcella DL, Watral M, Tourt-Uhlig S, Reardon D, Friedman HS. Phase II study of carboplatin in children with progressive low-grade gliomas. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Jul 1;20(13):2951-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.12.008.
PMID: 12089224BACKGROUNDSharif S, Ferner R, Birch JM, Gillespie JE, Gattamaneni HR, Baser ME, Evans DG. Second primary tumors in neurofibromatosis 1 patients treated for optic glioma: substantial risks after radiotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jun 1;24(16):2570-5. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.8349.
PMID: 16735710BACKGROUNDPetronio J, Edwards MS, Prados M, Freyberger S, Rabbitt J, Silver P, Levin VA. Management of chiasmal and hypothalamic gliomas of infancy and childhood with chemotherapy. J Neurosurg. 1991 May;74(5):701-8. doi: 10.3171/jns.1991.74.5.0701.
PMID: 1901597BACKGROUNDPacker RJ, Lange B, Ater J, Nicholson HS, Allen J, Walker R, Prados M, Jakacki R, Reaman G, Needles MN, et al. Carboplatin and vincristine for recurrent and newly diagnosed low-grade gliomas of childhood. J Clin Oncol. 1993 May;11(5):850-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1993.11.5.850.
PMID: 8487049BACKGROUNDLafay-Cousin L, Sung L, Carret AS, Hukin J, Wilson B, Johnston DL, Zelcer S, Silva M, Odame I, Mpofu C, Strother D, Bouffet E. Carboplatin hypersensitivity reaction in pediatric patients with low-grade glioma: a Canadian Pediatric Brain Tumor Consortium experience. Cancer. 2008 Feb 15;112(4):892-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23249.
PMID: 18098210BACKGROUNDKorinthenberg R, Neuburger D, Nikkhah G, Teske C, Schnabel K, Calaminus G. Assessing quality of life in long-term survivors after (1)(2)(5)I brachytherapy for low-grade glioma in childhood. Neuropediatrics. 2011 Jun;42(3):110-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1283111. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
PMID: 21739406BACKGROUNDBryant R. Managing side effects of childhood cancer treatment. J Pediatr Nurs. 2003 Apr;18(2):113-25. doi: 10.1053/jpdn.2003.11.
PMID: 12720208BACKGROUNDWoodgate RL, Degner LF, Yanofsky R. A different perspective to approaching cancer symptoms in children. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2003 Sep;26(3):800-17. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(03)00285-9.
PMID: 12967729BACKGROUNDKazak AE, Simms S, Rourke MT. Family systems practice in pediatric psychology. J Pediatr Psychol. 2002 Mar;27(2):133-43. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/27.2.133.
PMID: 11821497BACKGROUNDMulhern RK, Carpentieri S, Shema S, Stone P, Fairclough D. Factors associated with social and behavioral problems among children recently diagnosed with brain tumor. J Pediatr Psychol. 1993 Jun;18(3):339-50. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/18.3.339.
PMID: 8340843BACKGROUNDKatz ER, Varni JW. Social support and social cognitive problem-solving in children with newly diagnosed cancer. Cancer. 1993 May 15;71(10 Suppl):3314-9. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19930515)71:10+3.0.co;2-1.
PMID: 8490874BACKGROUNDO'Malley JE, Koocher G, Foster D, Slavin L. Psychiatric sequelae of surviving childhood cancer. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1979 Oct;49(4):608-616. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-0025.1979.tb02646.x.
PMID: 495703BACKGROUNDVannatta K, Gartstein MA, Short A, Noll RB. A controlled study of peer relationships of children surviving brain tumors: teacher, peer, and self ratings. J Pediatr Psychol. 1998 Oct;23(5):279-87. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/23.5.279.
PMID: 9782676BACKGROUNDLavigne JV, Faier-Routman J. Psychological adjustment to pediatric physical disorders: a meta-analytic review. J Pediatr Psychol. 1992 Apr;17(2):133-57. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/17.2.133.
PMID: 1534367BACKGROUNDPatenaude AF, Kupst MJ. Psychosocial functioning in pediatric cancer. J Pediatr Psychol. 2005 Jan-Feb;30(1):9-27. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsi012.
PMID: 15610981BACKGROUNDDolgin MJ, Somer E, Buchvald E, Zaizov R. Quality of life in adult survivors of childhood cancer. Soc Work Health Care. 1999;28(4):31-43. doi: 10.1300/J010v28n04_03.
PMID: 10425670BACKGROUNDOeffinger KC, Robison LL. Childhood cancer survivors, late effects, and a new model for understanding survivorship. JAMA. 2007 Jun 27;297(24):2762-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.24.2762. No abstract available.
PMID: 17595279BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alicia Lenzen, MD
Attending
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Attending
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 13, 2015
First Posted
May 27, 2015
Study Start
March 1, 2015
Primary Completion
August 31, 2025
Study Completion
November 30, 2025
Last Updated
November 26, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-11