Study Stopped
Neither dose achieved the study's primary or major secondary endpoints. The safety profile was consistent with previous ustekinumab studies.
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ustekinumab in the Treatment of Anti-TNFα Naive Participants With Active Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Ustekinumab in the Treatment of Anti-TNF Alpha Naive Subjects With Active Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis
3 other identifiers
interventional
347
7 countries
57
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of ustekinumab, in adult participants with active radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA), who are naive to anti-TNF alpha agents, as measured by the reduction in signs and symptoms of radiographic AxSpA.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Sep 2015
57 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 5, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 7, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 3, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 22, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 6, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 23, 2018
CompletedApril 29, 2025
April 1, 2025
1.6 years
May 5, 2015
March 22, 2018
April 25, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) 40 Response at Week 24
ASAS 40 defined as improvement from baseline of greater than or equal to (\>=) 40 percent (%) and absolute improvement from baseline of at least 2 on 0 to 10 centimeter (cm) scale in at least 3 of following 4 domains: Patient's global assessment (0 to 10cm; 0=very well,10=very poor),total back pain (0 to 10cm; 0=no pain,10=most severe pain), BASFI (self-assessment represented as mean (0 to 10 cm; 0=easy to 10=impossible) of 10 questions, 8 of which relate to participant's functional anatomy and 2 relate to participant's ability to cope with everyday life), Inflammation(0 to 10cm;0=none,10=very severe); no worsening at all from baseline in remaining domain. ASAS40 response based on imputed data using treatment failure(consider non-responders at and after treatment failure),early escape rules(consider non-responder at Week 20 and 24),non-responder\[NRI\] (missing responses at post baseline visit imputed as non-responder).
Week 24
Secondary Outcomes (35)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) 20 Response at Week 24
Week 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 50 Percent (%) Improvement From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at Week 24
Week 24
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) Total Score at Week 24
Baseline and Week 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score-C Reactive Protein (ASDAS-CRP) Inactive Disease (<1.3) at Week 24
Week 24
Change From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) Levels Through Week 24
Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
- +30 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Group 1 (Placebo)
PLACEBO COMPARATORPlacebo subcutaneous (SC) injection at Weeks 0, 4, and 16. At Week 24 all participants (with the exception of participants who qualified for early escape \[EE\]) will be re-randomized to receive either ustekinumab 45 or 90 milligram (mg) SC injection at Weeks 24 and 28 followed by every 12 weeks (q12w) dosing, with the last administration of study agent at Week 100. Participants who meet EE criteria (less than \[\<\] 10 percent \[%\] improvement from baseline in both total back pain and morning stiffness measures at both Week 12 and Week 16) will be administered open-label golimumab 50 mg SC administrations at Week 16 and every 4 weeks (q4w) thereafter through Week 52.
Group 2 (Ustekinumab 45 mg)
EXPERIMENTALUstekinumab 45 mg SC injection at Weeks 0 and 4, followed by every 12 week dosing, with the last administration of study agent at Week 100. At Week 24, participants will receive placebo SC injection to maintain the blind. Participants who meet EE criteria (\<10% improvement from baseline in both total back pain and morning stiffness measures at both Week 12 and Week 16) will be administered open-label golimumab 50 mg SC administrations at Week 16 and q4w thereafter through Week 52.
Group 3 (Ustekinumab 90 mg)
EXPERIMENTALUstekinumab 90 mg SC injection at Weeks 0 and 4, followed by q12w dosing, with the last administration of study agent at Week 100. At Week 24, participants will receive placebo SC injection to maintain the blind. Participants who meet EE criteria (\<10% improvement from baseline in both total back pain and morning stiffness measures at both Week 12 and Week 16) will be administered open-label golimumab 50 mg SC administrations at Week 16 and q4w thereafter through Week 52.
Interventions
Participants will receive Placebo subcutaneous (SC) injection at Weeks 0, 4, and 16 in Group 1 and at Week 24 in Group 2 and Group 3.
Participants will receive Ustekinumab 45 mg SC injection at Weeks 24 and 28 followed by every 12 weeks (q12w) dosing, with the last administration of study agent at Week 100 in Group 1. Participants will start with ustekinumab 45 mg SC injection at Weeks 0 and 4, followed by q12w dosing, with the last administration of study agent at Week 100 in Group 2.
Participants will receive Ustekinumab 90 mg SC injection at Weeks 24 and 28 followed by q12w dosing, with the last administration of study agent at Week 100 in Group 1. Participants will start with ustekinumab 90 mg SC injection at Weeks 0 and 4, followed by q12w dosing, with the last administration of study agent at Week 100 in Group 3.
Participants who meet EE criteria (less than \[\<\] 10 percent \[%\] improvement from baseline in both total back pain and morning stiffness measures at both Week 12 and Week 16) will be administered open-label golimumab 50 mg SC administrations at Week 16 and every 4 weeks (q4w) thereafter through Week 52 in Groups 1, 2 and 3.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participants must have a diagnosis of definite ankylosing spondylitis (AS), as defined by the modified 1984 New York criteria. The radiographic criterion must be confirmed by a central xray reader and at least 1 clinical criterion must be met
- Participants must have symptoms of active disease at screening and at baseline, as evidenced by both a BASDAI score of greater than or equal to (\>=4) and a visual analog scale (VAS) score for total back pain of \>=4, each on a scale of 0 to 10
- Participants with elevated high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) level of \>=0.300 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL) at Screening
- If using nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or other analgesics for AS, must be on a stable dose for at least 2 weeks prior to the first administration of study agent. If currently not using NSAIDs or other analgesics for AS, must not have received NSAIDs or other analgesics for AS for at least 2 weeks prior to the first administration of the study agent
- A woman of childbearing potential must have a negative serum (beta-human chorionic gonadotropin \[beta-hCG\]) at screening and a negative urine pregnancy test at Week 0 before randomization
You may not qualify if:
- Participants who have other inflammatory diseases that might confound the evaluations of benefit from the ustekinumab therapy, including but not limited to, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, or Lyme disease
- Participants who are pregnant, nursing, or planning a pregnancy or fathering a child while enrolled in the study or within 5 months after receiving the last administration of study agent
- Participants who have received any prior biologic therapy, including but not limited to anti-TNF alpha agents, tocilizumab, alefacept, efalizumab, natalizumab, abatacept, anakinra, ustekinumab, tidrakizumab or other anti-interleukin (IL) 23 biologics, brodalumab, secukinumab, ixekizumab, and B-cell depleting therapies
- Participants who have received any systemic immunosuppressives or disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) other than methotrexate (MTX), sulfasalazine (SSZ), or hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) within 4 weeks prior to first administration of study agent. Medications in these categories include, but are not limited to chloroquine, azathioprine, cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, gold, and penicillamine
- Participant who have received leflunomide within 3 months prior to the first administration of study agent (irrespective of undergoing a drug elimination procedure), or have received leflunomide within 12 months prior to the first administration of study agent and have not undergone a drug elimination procedure
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (57)
Unknown Facility
Peoria, Arizona, United States
Unknown Facility
St. Petersburg, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Tampa, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
Eagan, Minnesota, United States
Unknown Facility
Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Jackson, Tennessee, United States
Unknown Facility
Austin, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Mesquite, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Seattle, Washington, United States
Unknown Facility
Brno, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Bruntál, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Kladno, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Ostrava, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Pardubice, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Prague, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Uherské Hradiště, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Zlín, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Bydgoszcz, Poland
Unknown Facility
Szczecin, Poland
Unknown Facility
Torun, Poland
Unknown Facility
Warsaw, Poland
Unknown Facility
Wroclaw, Poland
Unknown Facility
Chelyabinsk, Russia
Unknown Facility
Chita, Russia
Unknown Facility
Ivanovo, Russia
Unknown Facility
Kemerovo, Russia
Unknown Facility
Kirov, Russia
Unknown Facility
Kursk, Russia
Unknown Facility
Moscow, Russia
Unknown Facility
Novosibirsk, Russia
Unknown Facility
Orenburg, Russia
Unknown Facility
Petrozavodsk, Russia
Unknown Facility
Pyatigorsk, Russia
Unknown Facility
Saint Petersburg, Russia
Unknown Facility
Saratov, Russia
Unknown Facility
Stavropol, Russia
Unknown Facility
Ufa, Russia
Unknown Facility
Ulyanovsk, Russia
Unknown Facility
Daegu, South Korea
Unknown Facility
Daejeon, South Korea
Unknown Facility
Gwangju, South Korea
Unknown Facility
Seoul, South Korea
Unknown Facility
Suwon, South Korea
Unknown Facility
Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
Unknown Facility
Taichung, Taiwan
Unknown Facility
Tainan, Taiwan
Unknown Facility
Taipei, Taiwan
Unknown Facility
Taoyuan District, Taiwan
Unknown Facility
Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine
Unknown Facility
Kharkiv, Ukraine
Unknown Facility
Lviv, Ukraine
Unknown Facility
Odesa, Ukraine
Unknown Facility
Ternopil, Ukraine
Unknown Facility
Vinnytsia, Ukraine
Unknown Facility
Zaporizhzhya, Ukraine
Related Publications (2)
Kavanaugh A, Baraliakos X, Gao S, Chen W, Sweet K, Chakravarty SD, Song Q, Shawi M, Rahman P. Genetic and Molecular Distinctions Between Axial Psoriatic Arthritis and Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis: Post Hoc Analyses from Four Phase 3 Clinical Trials. Adv Ther. 2023 May;40(5):2439-2456. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02475-4. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
PMID: 36995469DERIVEDDeodhar A, Gensler LS, Sieper J, Clark M, Calderon C, Wang Y, Zhou Y, Leu JH, Campbell K, Sweet K, Harrison DD, Hsia EC, van der Heijde D. Three Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Studies Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Ustekinumab in Axial Spondyloarthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019 Feb;71(2):258-270. doi: 10.1002/art.40728. Epub 2018 Dec 29.
PMID: 30225992DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The study was terminated since neither dose achieved the study's primary or major secondary endpoints.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- SENIOR DIRECTOR CLINICAL DEVELOPMENT
- Organization
- Johnson&Johnson
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 5, 2015
First Posted
May 7, 2015
Study Start
September 3, 2015
Primary Completion
March 22, 2017
Study Completion
September 6, 2017
Last Updated
April 29, 2025
Results First Posted
April 23, 2018
Record last verified: 2025-04