Study Stopped
FDA determined study device is significant risk. Study will not seek IDE.
New Tools for Assessing Fracture Risk
2 other identifiers
interventional
48
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this study is to determine whether two new, non-X-ray techniques can discriminate between high-energy fractures of normal bone (trauma) and low-energy fractures (fragility) of osteoporotic bone. The current gold-standard for assessing fracture risk areal bone mineral density (aBMD) by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is not particularly effective at identifying individuals who are at risk of suffering a fracture. Yet, there is a growing population of diabetics and elderly individuals prone to fractures. In effect, the age-related and diabetes-related increase in fracture risk is independent of a person's aBMD. These findings stress the urgency in developing diagnostic tools that can improve fracture risk prediction so that patients can be treated with the appropriate anti-fracture therapies.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2015
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 24, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 6, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 30, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 23, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 8, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 12, 2020
CompletedNovember 2, 2020
October 1, 2020
2.9 years
April 24, 2015
June 29, 2020
October 12, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Osteoprobe Measurements
Bone Material Strength index (BMSi) By engaging the bone at 10 N and then delivering a single impact force of \~40 N, the OsteoProbe records the maximum penetration depth of conical-spherical tip into cortical bone. This indentation distance increase (IDI) is indexed to the IDI acquired from a reference material immediately after the bone IDI measurements, such that the OsteoProbe-based measurement known as bone material strength index (BMSi) is 100 times IDI of reference material divided by IDI of the patient's bone. A lower BMSi measurement is the result of a higher indentation distance into the bone. For statistical analysis, we used the mean of the 10 BMSi measurements per case.
Within a week before or after surgery to repair distal radius fracture
MRI Scan Measurements
Bound Water Fraction
Within a week before or after surgery to repair distal radius fracture
MRI Scan Measurements
Pore Water Fraction
Within a week before or after surgery to repair distal radius fracture
DXA Scan Measurements
Bone Mineral Density
Within a week before or after surgery to repair distal radius fracture
DXA Scan Measurements
Bone Mineral Content
Within a week before or after surgery to repair distal radius fracture
DXA Scan Measurements
A T-score is the number of standard deviations (SD) below (negative value) or above (positive value) the mean BMD (bone mineral density) for a healthy population. A person with T-score below -2.5 is considered to have osteoporosis.
Within a week before or after surgery to repair distal radius fracture
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Patient-reported Measurements
Baseline/One-Time Completion and Post-op/-treatment: 3, 6, and 12 weeks
Patient-reported Measurements
Baseline and Post-op/-treatment: 3, 6, and 12 weeks
Study Arms (3)
Distal Radius Fracture Operative Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORFracture group patients will undergo DXA and MRI scans, along with Osteoprobe indentation.
Healthy Volunteers (Non Fracture Group)
ACTIVE COMPARATORHealthy volunteers will undergo DXA and MRI scans.
Distal Radius Fracture Non-operative Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORFracture group patients will undergo DXA and MRI scans, but will not undergo Osteoprobe indentation.
Interventions
Diagnostic tool used for bone indentation to measure the ability of the tissue to resist microindentation (bone mineral strength).
Assessment of Fracture Risk
Determines bound water and pore water of bone.
Eligibility Criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Number of patients in Arm#1= 60 patients
- Patients who are 18 years of age or older. This age range accounts for 60% of all distal radius fractures seen at Vanderbilt University Medical Center.
- Patients who have sustained a low or high energy distal radius fracture that involves the metaphysis and requires open reduction internal fixation using volar plating.
- English speaking due to feasibility of employing study personnel to deliver and assess study intervention.
- Patients who have known risk factors of pathologic fractures (e.g. bone metastasis)
- Patients who have or are receiving treatment for osteoporosis (e.g. bisphosphonate) lasted longer than 5 years
- Patients who have Type 1 diabetes
- Patients who have other bone disease (e.g., osteogenesis imperfecta, Paget's disease, thyroid disease, Vitamin D deficiency, hyperparathyroidism)
- Patients that have a history of cancer, abnormal serum calcium, or chronic steroid use
- Patients that would not be able to have a DXA scan (weight \>350lbs, hardware in hips, patients that have lap band device)
- Patients who are pregnant or who think they may be pregnant
- Patients that have a medical contraindication to MRI (if patients are undergoing a study MRI)
- Patients who have concurrent, bilateral upper extremity fractures where hardware or casting may affect study scan measurements
- Patients who have distal radial shaft fractures
- Number of patients in Arm#2= 40 patients
- +24 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Vanderbilt Univeristy Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Early termination of the study occurred in February 2020 when the FDA determined the OsteoProbe is a significant risk device that would require an IDE (Investigational Device Exemption).
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Jeffry S. Nyman, Ph.D.
- Organization
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jeffry S Nyman, PhD
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 24, 2015
First Posted
May 6, 2015
Study Start
June 30, 2015
Primary Completion
May 23, 2018
Study Completion
November 8, 2018
Last Updated
November 2, 2020
Results First Posted
October 12, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
No current plant to share individual participant data.