NCT02424851

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of bortezomib versus thalidomide in reducing free light chains in the blood of myeloma patients. In addition participants will receive bendamustine (chemotherapy) and dexamethasone (steroids), which increase the effectiveness of both bortezomib and thalidomide. The trial will also study whether an earlier reduction of free light chains increases the chances of the kidneys recovering.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
31

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_2 multiple-myeloma

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2014

Typical duration for phase_2 multiple-myeloma

Geographic Reach
1 country

9 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2014

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 10, 2015

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 23, 2015

Completed
5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 20, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 20, 2020

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

January 27, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

January 27, 2022

Status Verified

January 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

5.5 years

First QC Date

March 10, 2015

Results QC Date

May 11, 2021

Last Update Submit

January 26, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

myelomamultiple myelomachronic kidney diseaserenal failurebortezomibVelcadethalidomidebendamustinedexamethasoneserum free light chainsproteosomal inhibitionimmunomodulatory

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Number of Participants With >50% Reduction From Baseline in Serum Free Light Chain

    End of week 6 (after receiving two cycles of therapy)

  • Number of Participants With Different Renal Responses to Treatment

    End of week 12 (after receiving 4 cycles of therapy)

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Haematological and Non-haematological Toxicity in Both Treatment Arms

    End of weeks 3, 6, 9, 12 (after receiving 4 cycles of therapy), 30 days after final treatment and 12 months after randomisation

  • Overall Survival

    1 month post end of treatment and 1 year post randomisation

  • Renal Response After Two Cycles of Trial Treatment

    End of 2nd treatment cycle, week 6

  • Quality of Life Measured by the EQ-5D-3L Questionnaire at Baseline and 1 Month Follow up

    Baseline and 1 month follow up

Study Arms (2)

Arm A (BBD)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Bortezomib, Bendamustine and Dexamethasone

Drug: BortezomibDrug: BendamustineDrug: Dexamethasone

Arm B (BTD)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Thalidomide, Bendamustine and Dexamethasone

Drug: ThalidomideDrug: BendamustineDrug: Dexamethasone

Interventions

1.3 mg/m2 subcutaneously\* days 1, 4, 8 and 11 of each cycle. Number of cycles: Four 21 day cycles (participants not suitable for ASCT (autologous stem cell transplant) will continue up to 6 cycles on the treatment regimen to which they were randomised). \*intravenous infusion available in case of patient intolerance to subcutaneous bortezomib

Also known as: Velcade
Arm A (BBD)

100 mg daily orally, preferably at night, days 1-21 of each cycle. Four 21 day cycles (participants not suitable for ASCT will continue up to 6 cycles on the treatment regimen to which they were randomised)

Arm B (BTD)

60 mg/m2 i.v. days 1 and 8 of each cycle. Four 21 day cycles (participants not suitable for ASCT will continue up to 6 cycles on the treatment regimen to which they were randomised)

Arm A (BBD)Arm B (BTD)

40mg orally days 1-2, 4-5, 8-9 and 11-12 of each cycle

Arm A (BBD)Arm B (BTD)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the trial.
  • Patients attending NHS (National Health Service) Haemato-oncology centres.
  • Patients with newly diagnosed symptomatic myeloma.
  • Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) \<30 mls/min.
  • Chronic kidney disease (CKD) staging is based on estimated or measured GFR. CKD stage 4 (15-29 ml/min) and CKD stage 5 (\<15 ml/min) are eligible to enter the study. It is expected centres will consider use of fluid resuscitation and pulsed dose of steroid therapy in this group of patients to salvage renal function prior to trial screening.
  • A number of patients with newly diagnosed myeloma and renal failure will have a pre-existing medical condition (hypertension, diabetes etc.) causing renal damage. Where there is a medical condition (e.g. hypertension, diabetes) which may cause renal damage, there must have been a further decline (≥15 mls/min GFR) between previous steady state and the study screening.
  • Female participants of childbearing potential and male patients whose partner is a woman of childbearing potential must be prepared to use contraception in accordance with (and consent to) the Celgene-approved process for thalidomide and lenalidomide Risk Management and Pregnancy Prevention Programme.
  • Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test performed by a healthcare professional in accordance with the Celgene-approved process for thalidomide and lenalidomide Risk Management and Pregnancy Prevention.
  • Free of prior malignancies for ≥ 2 years with exception of currently treated basal cell, squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, localised prostate cancer or carcinoma "in-situ" of the cervix or breast.
  • In the Investigator's opinion, is able and willing to comply with all trial requirements.
  • Willing to allow his or her General Practitioner and consultant, if appropriate, to be notified of participation in the trial.

You may not qualify if:

  • Female participant who is pregnant, lactating or planning pregnancy during the course of the trial or the female partner of a male participant planning a pregnancy during the course of the trial.
  • Known allergy to investigational drugs.
  • Any other significant disease or disorder which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may either put the participants at risk because of participation in the trial, or may influence the result of the trial, or the participant's ability to participate in the trial.
  • Any of the following laboratory abnormalities:
  • Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) \< 1.0 x10\^9/L
  • Platelet count \<75 x 10\^9/L
  • Serum SGOT/AST or SGPT/ALT (serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase/aspartate aminotransferase or serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase/alanine aminotransferase) \>3 x upper limit of normal.
  • Use of any standard/experimental anti-myeloma drug therapy excluding dexamethasone 14 days prior to trial entry.
  • CKD stages \< 4.
  • Intention to use a physical method of serum free light chain removal such as plasma exchange or high cut off dialysis.
  • Grade 2 neuropathy or more (National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) v 4.0) will preclude use of thalidomide and bortezomib.
  • Participants who have participated in another research trial involving an investigational product in the past 12 weeks.
  • Contraindicated to receive either one of the study drugs, thalidomide, bortezomib, bendamustine based on the respective summary of product characteristics.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (9)

Basingstoke & North Hampshire Hospital

Basingstoke, United Kingdom

Location

Heartlands Hospitals

Birmingham, United Kingdom

Location

Kent & Canterbury Hospital

Canterbury, CT1 3NG, United Kingdom

Location

St Helier Hospital

Epsom, United Kingdom

Location

Royal Liverpool Hospital

Liverpool, United Kingdom

Location

Kings College Hospital

London, United Kingdom

Location

Churchill Hospital

Oxford, OX3 7LE, United Kingdom

Location

Queen Alexandra Hospital

Portsmouth, United Kingdom

Location

Great Western Hospital

Swindon, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (26)

  • Kumar SK, Rajkumar SV, Dispenzieri A, Lacy MQ, Hayman SR, Buadi FK, Zeldenrust SR, Dingli D, Russell SJ, Lust JA, Greipp PR, Kyle RA, Gertz MA. Improved survival in multiple myeloma and the impact of novel therapies. Blood. 2008 Mar 1;111(5):2516-20. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-10-116129. Epub 2007 Nov 1.

    PMID: 17975015BACKGROUND
  • Brenner H, Gondos A, Pulte D. Expected long-term survival of patients diagnosed with multiple myeloma in 2006-2010. Haematologica. 2009 Feb;94(2):270-5. doi: 10.3324/haematol.13782. Epub 2009 Jan 14.

    PMID: 19144659BACKGROUND
  • Landgren O, Kyle RA, Pfeiffer RM, Katzmann JA, Caporaso NE, Hayes RB, Dispenzieri A, Kumar S, Clark RJ, Baris D, Hoover R, Rajkumar SV. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) consistently precedes multiple myeloma: a prospective study. Blood. 2009 May 28;113(22):5412-7. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-12-194241. Epub 2009 Jan 29.

    PMID: 19179464BACKGROUND
  • Knudsen LM, Hippe E, Hjorth M, Holmberg E, Westin J. Renal function in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma--a demographic study of 1353 patients. The Nordic Myeloma Study Group. Eur J Haematol. 1994 Oct;53(4):207-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.1994.tb00190.x.

    PMID: 7957804BACKGROUND
  • Eleutherakis-Papaiakovou V, Bamias A, Gika D, Simeonidis A, Pouli A, Anagnostopoulos A, Michali E, Economopoulos T, Zervas K, Dimopoulos MA; Greek Myeloma Study Group. Renal failure in multiple myeloma: incidence, correlations, and prognostic significance. Leuk Lymphoma. 2007 Feb;48(2):337-41. doi: 10.1080/10428190601126602.

    PMID: 17325894BACKGROUND
  • Clark AD, Shetty A, Soutar R. Renal failure and multiple myeloma: pathogenesis and treatment of renal failure and management of underlying myeloma. Blood Rev. 1999 Jun;13(2):79-90. doi: 10.1016/s0268-960x(99)90014-0.

    PMID: 10414944BACKGROUND
  • Drayson M, Begum G, Basu S, Makkuni S, Dunn J, Barth N, Child JA. Effects of paraprotein heavy and light chain types and free light chain load on survival in myeloma: an analysis of patients receiving conventional-dose chemotherapy in Medical Research Council UK multiple myeloma trials. Blood. 2006 Sep 15;108(6):2013-9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-03-008953. Epub 2006 May 25.

    PMID: 16728700BACKGROUND
  • Morgan GJ, Davies FE, Gregory WM, Bell SE, Szubert AJ, Navarro Coy N, Cook G, Feyler S, Johnson PR, Rudin C, Drayson MT, Owen RG, Ross FM, Russell NH, Jackson GH, Child JA; National Cancer Research Institute Haematological Oncology Clinical Studies Group. Cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone as induction therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients destined for autologous stem-cell transplantation: MRC Myeloma IX randomized trial results. Haematologica. 2012 Mar;97(3):442-50. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2011.043372. Epub 2011 Nov 4.

    PMID: 22058209BACKGROUND
  • Augustson BM, Begum G, Dunn JA, Barth NJ, Davies F, Morgan G, Behrens J, Smith A, Child JA, Drayson MT. Early mortality after diagnosis of multiple myeloma: analysis of patients entered onto the United kingdom Medical Research Council trials between 1980 and 2002--Medical Research Council Adult Leukaemia Working Party. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Dec 20;23(36):9219-26. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.2086. Epub 2005 Nov 7.

    PMID: 16275935BACKGROUND
  • Torra R, Blade J, Cases A, Lopez-Pedret J, Montserrat E, Rozman C, Revert L. Patients with multiple myeloma requiring long-term dialysis: presenting features, response to therapy, and outcome in a series of 20 cases. Br J Haematol. 1995 Dec;91(4):854-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1995.tb05400.x.

    PMID: 8547129BACKGROUND
  • Kastritis E, Anagnostopoulos A, Roussou M, Gika D, Matsouka C, Barmparousi D, Grapsa I, Psimenou E, Bamias A, Dimopoulos MA. Reversibility of renal failure in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients treated with high dose dexamethasone-containing regimens and the impact of novel agents. Haematologica. 2007 Apr;92(4):546-9. doi: 10.3324/haematol.10759.

    PMID: 17488666BACKGROUND
  • Knudsen LM, Hjorth M, Hippe E. Renal failure in multiple myeloma: reversibility and impact on the prognosis. Nordic Myeloma Study Group. Eur J Haematol. 2000 Sep;65(3):175-81. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0609.2000.90221.x.

    PMID: 11007053BACKGROUND
  • Alexanian R, Barlogie B, Dixon D. Renal failure in multiple myeloma. Pathogenesis and prognostic implications. Arch Intern Med. 1990 Aug;150(8):1693-5.

    PMID: 2383164BACKGROUND
  • Gandhi V. Metabolism and mechanisms of action of bendamustine: rationales for combination therapies. Semin Oncol. 2002 Aug;29(4 Suppl 13):4-11. doi: 10.1053/sonc.2002.34872.

    PMID: 12170425BACKGROUND
  • Gaul L, Mandl-Weber S, Baumann P, Emmerich B, Schmidmaier R. Bendamustine induces G2 cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in myeloma cells: the role of ATM-Chk2-Cdc25A and ATM-p53-p21-pathways. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2008 Feb;134(2):245-53. doi: 10.1007/s00432-007-0278-x. Epub 2007 Jul 25.

    PMID: 17653574BACKGROUND
  • Ponisch W, Mitrou PS, Merkle K, Herold M, Assmann M, Wilhelm G, Dachselt K, Richter P, Schirmer V, Schulze A, Subert R, Harksel B, Grobe N, Stelzer E, Schulze M, Bittrich A, Freund M, Pasold R, Friedrich T, Helbig W, Niederwieser D; East German Study Group of Hematology and Oncology (OSHO). Treatment of bendamustine and prednisone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma results in superior complete response rate, prolonged time to treatment failure and improved quality of life compared to treatment with melphalan and prednisone--a randomized phase III study of the East German Study Group of Hematology and Oncology (OSHO). J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2006 Apr;132(4):205-12. doi: 10.1007/s00432-005-0074-4. Epub 2006 Jan 10.

    PMID: 16402269BACKGROUND
  • Knop S, Straka C, Haen M, Schwedes R, Hebart H, Einsele H. The efficacy and toxicity of bendamustine in recurrent multiple myeloma after high-dose chemotherapy. Haematologica. 2005 Sep;90(9):1287-8.

    PMID: 16154860BACKGROUND
  • Haubitz M, Bohnenstengel F, Brunkhorst R, Schwab M, Hofmann U, Busse D. Cyclophosphamide pharmacokinetics and dose requirements in patients with renal insufficiency. Kidney Int. 2002 Apr;61(4):1495-501. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2002.00279.x.

    PMID: 11918757BACKGROUND
  • Eriksson T, Hoglund P, Turesson I, Waage A, Don BR, Vu J, Scheffler M, Kaysen GA. Pharmacokinetics of thalidomide in patients with impaired renal function and while on and off dialysis. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2003 Dec;55(12):1701-6. doi: 10.1211/0022357022241.

    PMID: 14738599BACKGROUND
  • Tosi P, Zamagni E, Cellini C, Cangini D, Tacchetti P, Tura S, Baccarani M, Cavo M. Thalidomide alone or in combination with dexamethasone in patients with advanced, relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma and renal failure. Eur J Haematol. 2004 Aug;73(2):98-103. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2004.00272.x.

    PMID: 15245508BACKGROUND
  • Morgan GJ, Davies FE, Gregory WM, Russell NH, Bell SE, Szubert AJ, Navarro Coy N, Cook G, Feyler S, Byrne JL, Roddie H, Rudin C, Drayson MT, Owen RG, Ross FM, Jackson GH, Child JA; NCRI Haematological Oncology Study Group. Cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (CTD) as initial therapy for patients with multiple myeloma unsuitable for autologous transplantation. Blood. 2011 Aug 4;118(5):1231-8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-02-338665. Epub 2011 Jun 7.

    PMID: 21652683BACKGROUND
  • Ramasamy K, Hazel B, Mahmood S, Corderoy S, Schey S. Bendamustine in combination with thalidomide and dexamethasone is an effective therapy for myeloma patients with end stage renal disease. Br J Haematol. 2011 Dec;155(5):632-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2011.08754.x. Epub 2011 Jun 21. No abstract available.

    PMID: 21689088BACKGROUND
  • Jagannath S, Barlogie B, Berenson JR, Singhal S, Alexanian R, Srkalovic G, Orlowski RZ, Richardson PG, Anderson J, Nix D, Esseltine DL, Anderson KC; SUMMIT/CREST Investigators. Bortezomib in recurrent and/or refractory multiple myeloma. Initial clinical experience in patients with impared renal function. Cancer. 2005 Mar 15;103(6):1195-200. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20888.

    PMID: 15690325BACKGROUND
  • Chanan-Khan AA, Kaufman JL, Mehta J, Richardson PG, Miller KC, Lonial S, Munshi NC, Schlossman R, Tariman J, Singhal S. Activity and safety of bortezomib in multiple myeloma patients with advanced renal failure: a multicenter retrospective study. Blood. 2007 Mar 15;109(6):2604-6. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-09-046409. Epub 2006 Nov 30.

    PMID: 17138816BACKGROUND
  • San Miguel JF, Schlag R, Khuageva NK, Dimopoulos MA, Shpilberg O, Kropff M, Spicka I, Petrucci MT, Palumbo A, Samoilova OS, Dmoszynska A, Abdulkadyrov KM, Schots R, Jiang B, Mateos MV, Anderson KC, Esseltine DL, Liu K, Cakana A, van de Velde H, Richardson PG; VISTA Trial Investigators. Bortezomib plus melphalan and prednisone for initial treatment of multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2008 Aug 28;359(9):906-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0801479.

    PMID: 18753647BACKGROUND
  • Fenk R, Michael M, Zohren F, Graef T, Czibere A, Bruns I, Neumann F, Fenk B, Haas R, Kobbe G. Escalation therapy with bortezomib, dexamethasone and bendamustine for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Leuk Lymphoma. 2007 Dec;48(12):2345-51. doi: 10.1080/10428190701694194.

    PMID: 18067009BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Multiple MyelomaRenal Insufficiency, ChronicNeoplasms, Plasma CellRenal Insufficiency

Interventions

BortezomibThalidomideBendamustine HydrochlorideDexamethasone

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms by Histologic TypeNeoplasmsHemostatic DisordersVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesParaproteinemiasBlood Protein DisordersHematologic DiseasesHemic and Lymphatic DiseasesHemorrhagic DisordersLymphoproliferative DisordersImmunoproliferative DisordersImmune System DiseasesKidney DiseasesUrologic DiseasesFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesMale Urogenital DiseasesChronic DiseaseDisease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Boronic AcidsAcids, NoncarboxylicAcidsInorganic ChemicalsBoron CompoundsOrganic ChemicalsPyrazinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsPhthalimidesPhthalic AcidsAcids, CarbocyclicCarboxylic AcidsPiperidonesPiperidinesIsoindolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingButyratesAcids, AcyclicNitrogen Mustard CompoundsMustard CompoundsHydrocarbons, HalogenatedHydrocarbonsBenzimidazolesPregnadienetriolsPregnadienesPregnanesSteroidsFused-Ring CompoundsPolycyclic CompoundsSteroids, Fluorinated

Results Point of Contact

Title
Richard Brouwer
Organization
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Study Officials

  • Karthik Ramasamy

    National Health Service, United Kingdom

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Dr.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 10, 2015

First Posted

April 23, 2015

Study Start

November 1, 2014

Primary Completion

April 20, 2020

Study Completion

April 20, 2020

Last Updated

January 27, 2022

Results First Posted

January 27, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-01

Locations