Dysphagia Following Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery; Steroid vs Saline
DysDexVSSal
The Effects of Perioperative Steroids on Dysphagia Following Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery: A Randomized, Prospective, Double-Blind Study.
1 other identifier
interventional
74
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This prospective, randomized, double blind, controlled study evaluates the effect of perioperative IV steroids versus saline on swallowing after anterior cervical spine surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2012
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 9, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 15, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 15, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 15, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 30, 2018
CompletedFebruary 5, 2019
January 1, 2019
3.9 years
January 9, 2015
December 6, 2017
January 15, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Swallowing Difficulty
Two measurement surveys were used: The Dysphagia Short Questionnaire: An Instrument for Evaluation of Dysphagia (DSQ) and Bazaz Dysphagia Scale (Bazaz). The DSQ and Bazaz determine levels of dysphagia over time after anterior cervical spine surgery. A DSQ score of zero indicates no symptoms. Any number above zero indicates difficulty swallowing. The Bazaz score of Zero indicates no symptoms. Any number above zero indicates difficulty swallowing. Numbers of subjects reporting any difficulty swallowing (had to have a score of at least 1) at various time points are listed below associated with the randomization assignment and survey used.
1 day; 2 days; 1 week; 2 weeks; 1 month; 3 months; 6 months;12 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Change in Quality of Life
Baseline and 1 year (or last visit as appropriate). Not all subjects followed up at 1 year.
Fusion Rate Steroid vs Placebo
1 year
Study Arms (2)
Treatment 1; Dexamethasone
EXPERIMENTALPatients undergoing elective anterior cervical spine surgery will be seen by spine surgeons. After consent the Bazaz and Dysphagia Short Questionnaire will be administered at baseline prior to surgery, Day 1, Day 2, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery. Patients will be randomized to either the steroid administration group or the saline administration group. Patients randomized to the experimental (steroid) group will receive 0.3 mg/kg of intravenous dexamethasone within one hour of the incision, then 0.15 mg/kg every eight hours for two doses. This dosage is approximately 20 mg, 10 mg, and 10 mg of dexamethasone. Patients in the control(saline) group will receive a similar volume of saline on the same schedule for three doses.
Treatment 0; Saline placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORPatients undergoing elective anterior cervical spine surgery will be seen by spine surgeons. After consent the Bazaz and Dysphagia Short Questionnaire will be administered at baseline prior to surgery, Day 1, Day 2, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery. Patients will be randomized to either the steroid administration group or the saline administration group. Patients randomized to the experimental (steroid) group will receive 0.3 mg/kg of intravenous dexamethasone within one hour of the incision, then 0.15 mg/kg every eight hours for two doses. This dosage is approximately 20 mg, 10 mg, and 10 mg of dexamethasone. Patients in the control(saline) group will receive a similar volume of saline on the same schedule for three doses.
Interventions
Dexamethasone IV given within the first hour of surgery; second dose given 8 hours after first dose; third dose given 8 hours after second dose.
Saline (placebo) IV given within the first hour of surgery; second dose given 8 hours after first dose; third dose given 8 hours after second dose.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Elective anterior approach to subaxial cervical spine (C3 - T1);
- ages 18-80
You may not qualify if:
- Traumatic or tumor etiologies
- undergoing anterior-posterior operations
- neoplastic, or infectious conditions requiring surgery
- a history of previous anterior cervical spine surgery
- any patient requiring a halo vest
- patients on chronic steroids
- patients remaining intubated post-operatively (please see more under risks below)
- less than 18 years of age
- pregnant women
- no phone
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
West Virginia University
Morgantown, West Virginia, 26506, United States
Related Publications (13)
Riley LH 3rd, Vaccaro AR, Dettori JR, Hashimoto R. Postoperative dysphagia in anterior cervical spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Apr 20;35(9 Suppl):S76-85. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d81a96.
PMID: 20407354BACKGROUNDFountas KN. Re: Papavero L, Heese O, Klotz-Regener V, et al. The impact of esophagus retraction on early dysphagia after anterior cervical surgery. Spine 2007;32:1089-93. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Dec 15;32(26):3090. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815cd40f. No abstract available.
PMID: 18091507BACKGROUNDMendoza-Lattes S, Clifford K, Bartelt R, Stewart J, Clark CR, Boezaart AP. Dysphagia following anterior cervical arthrodesis is associated with continuous, strong retraction of the esophagus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Feb;90(2):256-63. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00258.
PMID: 18245583BACKGROUNDCavusoglu H, Tuncer C, Tanik C, Mutlu Z, Zengin E, Karabagli M, Aydin Y. The impact of automatic retractors on the esophagus during anterior cervical surgery: an experimental in vivo study in a sheep model. J Neurosurg Spine. 2009 Nov;11(5):547-54. doi: 10.3171/2009.6.SPINE09216.
PMID: 19929356BACKGROUNDLee MJ, Bazaz R, Furey CG, Yoo J. Risk factors for dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery: a two-year prospective cohort study. Spine J. 2007 Mar-Apr;7(2):141-7. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.02.024. Epub 2007 Jan 22.
PMID: 17321961BACKGROUNDRihn JA, Kane J, Albert TJ, Vaccaro AR, Hilibrand AS. What is the incidence and severity of dysphagia after anterior cervical surgery? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Mar;469(3):658-65. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1731-8.
PMID: 21140251BACKGROUNDSiska PA, Ponnappan RK, Hohl JB, Lee JY, Kang JD, Donaldson WF 3rd. Dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery: a prospective study using the swallowing-quality of life questionnaire and analysis of patient comorbidities. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Aug 1;36(17):1387-91. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31822340f2.
PMID: 21785303BACKGROUNDKang SH, Kim DK, Seo KM, Kim KT, Kim YB. Multi-level spinal fusion and postoperative prevertebral thickness increase the risk of dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery. J Clin Neurosci. 2011 Oct;18(10):1369-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2011.02.033. Epub 2011 Jul 27.
PMID: 21798743BACKGROUNDBazaz R, Lee MJ, Yoo JU. Incidence of dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery: a prospective study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Nov 15;27(22):2453-8. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200211150-00007.
PMID: 12435974BACKGROUNDRiley LH 3rd, Skolasky RL, Albert TJ, Vaccaro AR, Heller JG. Dysphagia after anterior cervical decompression and fusion: prevalence and risk factors from a longitudinal cohort study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Nov 15;30(22):2564-9. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000186317.86379.02.
PMID: 16284596BACKGROUNDPedram M, Castagnera L, Carat X, Macouillard G, Vital JM. Pharyngolaryngeal lesions in patients undergoing cervical spine surgery through the anterior approach: contribution of methylprednisolone. Eur Spine J. 2003 Feb;12(1):84-90. doi: 10.1007/s00586-002-0495-6. Epub 2002 Dec 4.
PMID: 12592551BACKGROUNDEmery SE, Akhavan S, Miller P, Furey CG, Yoo JU, Rowbottom JR, Bohlman HH. Steroids and risk factors for airway compromise in multilevel cervical corpectomy patients: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Feb 1;34(3):229-32. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318193a287.
PMID: 19148042BACKGROUNDLee SH, Kim KT, Suk KS, Park KJ, Oh KI. Effect of retropharyngeal steroid on prevertebral soft tissue swelling following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective, randomized study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Dec 15;36(26):2286-92. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318237e5d0.
PMID: 22020609BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Sanford Emery
- Organization
- West Virginia University Department of Orthopaedics
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sanford E Emery, MD, MBA
West Virginia University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor and Chair West Virginia University Department of Orthopaedics
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 9, 2015
First Posted
April 15, 2015
Study Start
July 1, 2012
Primary Completion
May 15, 2016
Study Completion
May 15, 2017
Last Updated
February 5, 2019
Results First Posted
March 30, 2018
Record last verified: 2019-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- Within one year of study completion
- Access Criteria
- Through a published manuscript and to participants via phone call or clinic visit when the participants return for regularly scheduled follow up visits.
Group data will be available via publication. Participants are told their randomization assignment at one year, or up to two year, follow up post surgery, dependent on their return to clinic.