Study Stopped
Difficulty with recruiting patients; poor quality of EMG
Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) for Dysphagia in Neonates
Randomized Treatment of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) for Dysphagia in Neonates
1 other identifier
interventional
12
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate if the use of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) will provide a more efficient method of treating neonates with dysfunctional oral feeding such as dysphagia. This study will attempt to determine if NMES applied to neonates at 36-42 weeks post-conception age (PCA) will decrease the need for nasogastric tubes (NG) and gastrostomy tubes (G-TUBE). Increase the rate at which these neonates complete full oral feeds, improve their swallowing skills, increase oral intake of calories, and gain weight.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2013
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 14, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 11, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2016
CompletedJuly 18, 2017
September 1, 2016
2.7 years
October 14, 2013
July 17, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Reduction in G-tube rate insertions for the treatment grouped compared to the sham group.
Over the course of the treatment time frame to discharge, 2 weeks to 8 weeks
Increased percent of subjects towards achieving full oral feedings earlier in the subject's dysphagia treatment.
Over the course of the treatment time frame to discharge, 2 weeks to 8 weeks
Increase the amount of formula volume taken at feedings from beginning to end of study.
2 weeks
Earlier NG tube removal for the treatment group compared to the control group.
Over the course of the treatment time frame to discharge, 2 weeks to 8 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Improve swallowing skills as measured by videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) and the video swallow assessment worksheet.
2 weeks
Decrease spells with oral feeds over the course of the study.
2 weeks
Allow for healthy weight gain via improved feedings.
2 weeks
Increase the caloric intake orally.
2 weeks
Decrease the oxygen requirement before and after study.
2 weeks
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
VitalStim
EXPERIMENTALThis group will be assigned to the active VitalStim unit.
Sham VitalStim
SHAM COMPARATORThis group will be assigned to the sham VitalStim unit.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female.
- Meet diagnostic criteria for dysphagia symptoms using the NOMAS and a VFSS.
- Infants with intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) and hypoxic events can be included.
- Infants taking less than 5-10% of target volume by mouth between the ages of 36-42 weeks PCA.
- Multiple swallows to clear bolus following suck that includes a desaturation \<80% and bradycardia \<80 bpm.
- Apnea spells during feeds.
- Aspiration or penetration by VFSS
You may not qualify if:
- Known neurologic or neurodegenerative disorders.
- Chromosomal anomalies and syndromes.
- Cleft lip or palate.
- Birth defects.
- Unresolved cutaneous rash at the area of electrode placement.
- Medical condition that is a contraindication to NMES.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Sanford Healthlead
Study Sites (1)
Sanford USD Medical Center
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, 57117, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Akram Khan, MD
Sanford Health
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 14, 2013
First Posted
December 11, 2013
Study Start
November 1, 2013
Primary Completion
July 1, 2016
Study Completion
July 1, 2016
Last Updated
July 18, 2017
Record last verified: 2016-09