Feedback on Perioperative Temperature Management and Patient Outcomes: Three-arm Trial to Compare Feedback
Effect of Audit and Feedback on Physicians' Perioperative Temperature Management and Patient Outcomes: A Three-arm Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Benchmarked and Ranked Feedback
1 other identifier
interventional
45
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The investigators aim to assess the impact of benchmarked and ranked feedback on anesthesiologists' perioperative temperature management and subsequent patient outcomes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2015
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 19, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 10, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 6, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 6, 2018
CompletedMarch 24, 2020
March 1, 2020
3.2 years
March 19, 2015
March 20, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Patient peri-operative temperature
Within the 30 minutes immediately before or the 15 minutes immediately after anesthesia end time.
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Intraoperative warming device usage perioperative
intraoperative
Patient post-operative surgical site infection (SSI) rate
Within 30 days of surgery
Study Arms (3)
Control
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants in this study arm will receive no form of feedback.
Benchmarked Feedback
OTHERParticipants in this study arm will receive benchmarked feedback regarding their perioperative temperature management.
Ranked Feedback
OTHERParticipants in this study arm will receive ranked feedback regarding their perioperative temperature management.
Interventions
Participants receive data, during the 6 month intervention phase, regarding their monthly temperature management performance in the form of benchmarked feedback, which is the measure of their performance in comparison the standard set by the hospital.
Participants receive data, during the 6 month intervention phase, regarding their monthly temperature management performance in the form of ranked feedback, which is the measure of their performance in comparison to their peers.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Staff Anesthesiologists at The Ottawa Hospital
You may not qualify if:
- none
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The Ottawa Hospital
Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y4E9, Canada
Related Publications (1)
Boet S, Bryson GL, Taljaard M, Pigford AA, McIsaac DI, Brehaut J, Forster A, Mohamed K, Clavel N, Pysyk C, Grimshaw JM; Canadian Perioperative Anesthesia Clinical Trials Group. Effect of audit and feedback on physicians' intraoperative temperature management and patient outcomes: a three-arm cluster randomized-controlled trial comparing benchmarked and ranked feedback. Can J Anaesth. 2018 Nov;65(11):1196-1209. doi: 10.1007/s12630-018-1205-0. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
PMID: 30159716DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sylvain Boet, MD, PhD
The Ottawa Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 19, 2015
First Posted
April 10, 2015
Study Start
February 1, 2015
Primary Completion
April 6, 2018
Study Completion
April 6, 2018
Last Updated
March 24, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-03