A Comparison of Inhalation vs. Intravenous Induction
INHvsIV
A Comparison of the Effect on Temperature Between Patients Induced With Intravenous Propofol vs Inhalation Induction With Sevoflurane
1 other identifier
interventional
331
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To compart differences on the effect on core temperature between anesthetic induction with intravenous propofol versus inhalation induction with sevoflurane
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2014
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 20, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 6, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 17, 2017
CompletedApril 17, 2017
April 1, 2017
1.2 years
November 20, 2014
February 6, 2017
April 12, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Measurement of Core Temperature
Core temperature at 15 minute intervals
intraoperative
Temperature Below 36.0 Degrees C
Percentage of patients who had at least one temperature below 36.0 degrees C in the first hour of anesthesia
Intraoperative
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Measurement of Blood Pressure
intraoperative
Study Arms (6)
sevoflurane in 100% oxygen, age <56
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe intervention will be the randomized selection of anesthetic induction technique to sevoflurane in 100% oxygen and temperatures will be recorded per protocol. Age 18-55.
sevoflurane in 50% nitrous, age <56
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe intervention will be the randomized selection of anesthetic induction technique to sevoflurane in 50% oxygen and 50% nitrous oxide. Age 18-55.
propofol, age <56
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe intervention will be the randomized selection of anesthetic induction technique to intravenous induction with 2.2 mg/kg propofol. Age 18-55.
propofol with phenylephrine, age <56
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe intervention will be the randomized selection of anesthetic induction technique to intravenous induction 2.2 mg/kg propofol immediately preceded by 160 mcg intravenous phenylephrine. Age 18-55.
sevoflurane in 100% oxygen, age >55
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe intervention will be the randomized selection of anesthetic induction technique to sevoflurane in 100% oxygen and temperatures will be recorded per protocol. Age \>55.
sevoflurane in 50% nitrous, age >55
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe intervention will be the randomized selection of anesthetic induction technique to sevoflurane in 50% oxygen and 50% nitrous oxide. Age \>55.
Interventions
Standard anesthesia care will be provided after induction based on randomization. Temperatures will be monitored every 15 minutes
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Elective surgery Adult, age \>= 18 years old Scheduled for general anesthesia Medically fit and able to safely go any of the four anesthetic inductions in the study
You may not qualify if:
- Emergency surgery, or any other aspiration risk Minor, age \<18 Pregnant Febrile illness Contraindication to nasal instrumentation Allergy to propofol Malignant hyperthermia Requiring Total Invravenous Anesthesia (TIVA) Inability to oxygenate on less than 50% FiO2 Intra-cranial surgery Receiving vasoactive medications Significant valvular heart disease Unstable cardiac disease Surgery requiring prone or lateral positioning Contraindication to nitrous oxide Prisoners
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Albert EinsteinMedical Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19141, United States
Related Publications (1)
Roth JV, Braitman LE, Hunt LH. Induction techniques that reduce redistribution hypothermia: a prospective, randomized, controlled, single blind effectiveness study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 Nov 6;19(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0866-8.
PMID: 31694576DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Jonathan Roth, M.D.
- Organization
- Albert Einstein Healthcare Network
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jonathan V Roth, MD
Albert Einstein Healthcare Network
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Staff Anesthesiologist, M.D.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 20, 2014
First Posted
January 6, 2015
Study Start
August 1, 2014
Primary Completion
October 1, 2015
Study Completion
April 1, 2016
Last Updated
April 17, 2017
Results First Posted
April 17, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-04