Use Feasibility of the iThermonitor in Pediatrics Patients on Myelosuppresive Therapies
1 other identifier
interventional
25
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a pilot study to evaluate the use feasibility of the iThermonitor, a continuous temperature monitoring device, as a clinical support and patient self-management tool in the management of pediatrics patients on myelosuppressive therapies for acute leukemia and other childhood cancers.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started May 2015
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 30, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 7, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 31, 2018
CompletedOctober 22, 2020
September 1, 2020
2.2 years
March 30, 2015
March 20, 2018
September 27, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percent of Participants That Successfully Used the iThermonitor
This will be assessed by ability of the device to successfully capture, transmit and display the patient's body temperature data on the study iPod TouchiPad mini. To limit recall bias, subjects will be required to log the ability to view the temperature data on the iPad mini once a day for the entire duration of the study. The device will be deemed a feasible continuous temperature monitoring tool if at least 80% of study subjects are able to successfully use the iThermonitor to monitor their body temperature. A subject must be able to view temperature data on the provided iPad mini at least 80% of the time in the study to be considered successful. "Time in the study" here is defined as the number of days the subject spends in the study which is expected to be two weeks.
Two Weeks
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Care Giver Anxiety
0 & 2 weeks
Usability, Acceptability and Satisfaction
2 weeks
Study Arms (1)
iThermonitor
EXPERIMENTALParticipants are asked to use the iThermonitor device for two weeks to monitor their temperature. Participants are asked to wear the device for as many hours as they can but at a minimum to wear while sleeping.
Interventions
The device is a continuous temperature monitoring tool for home monitoring of temperature. Participants are asked to use this device for two weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Dyad consists of a pediatric patient aged 2-17 years undergoing myelosuppressive therapies for acute leukemias and other childhood cancers.
- Dyad also includes a caregiver, ≥ 18 years of age that is willing to participate in the study.
- Ability of caregiver or patient (if old enough) to read and speak English.
- If applicable, willingness of the patient to shave axillary (armpit) hair.
- Caregiver (parent or legal guardian) must give informed consent for dyad participation.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient has a history of allergy to hydrogel dressing or ongoing skin diseases
- Patients with ongoing febrile illness or documented infectious disease.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Massachusetts General Hospitallead
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institutecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Amanda Centi
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
Related Publications (1)
Kakarmath SS, de Redon E, Centi AJ, Palacholla R, Kvedar J, Jethwani K, Agboola S. Assessing the Usability of an Automated Continuous Temperature Monitoring Device (iThermonitor) in Pediatric Patients: Non-Randomized Pilot Study. JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2018 Dec 21;1(2):e10804. doi: 10.2196/10804.
PMID: 31518304DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
One major limitation of our study is the lack of a control group that used another temperature measurement device such as a digital thermometer without a companion app or automated temperature measurement features.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Amanda Centi
- Organization
- Partners Connected Health Innovations
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Stephen Agboola, MD, MPH
Partners Connected Health Innovations
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dermatologist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 30, 2015
First Posted
April 7, 2015
Study Start
May 1, 2015
Primary Completion
July 1, 2017
Study Completion
August 1, 2017
Last Updated
October 22, 2020
Results First Posted
July 31, 2018
Record last verified: 2020-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
There is no plan to share IPD.