Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Chemoradiotherapy in Esophageal Cancer
A Phase II Randomized Trial of Induction Chemotherapy Versus no Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Definitive Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Inoperable Thoracic Esophageal Cancer
1 other identifier
interventional
110
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The contribution of induction chemotherapy before definitive chemoradiotherapy is unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and toxicity of induction chemotherapy followed by definitive chemoradiotherapy versus no induction chemotherapy in patients with inoperable thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started May 2015
Longer than P75 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 19, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 31, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 6, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 30, 2020
CompletedJune 2, 2020
May 1, 2020
2.4 years
March 19, 2015
May 30, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
overall response rate (clinical complete response and partial response)
RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) criteria was used to determine the tumor response. Tumor response was evaluated 3 months after the completion of treatment based on barium esophagography, CT scans, and endoscopy with biopsies.
3 months after chemoradiotherapy (plus or minus 7 days)
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Overall survival
3 years
Progression-free survival
3 years
Study Arms (2)
Concurrent chemoradiotherapy
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients assigned to this Arm received concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The prescribed dose of radiotherapy is generally 50-60 Gy/25-28fr. The concomitant chemotherapy is docetaxel 20 mg/m2 on day 1, cisplatin 25 mg/m2 on day 1, repeated weekly during radiation.
Induction chemotherapy plus chemoradiotherapy
EXPERIMENTALPatients assigned to this Arm first received two cycles of 3-weekly schedule of IC before definitive chemoradiotherapy, consisting of docetaxel 75 mg/m2 on day 1 and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1. The prescribed dose of radiotherapy is generally 50-60 Gy/25-28fr. The concomitant chemotherapy is docetaxel 20 mg/m2 on day 1, cisplatin 25 mg/m2 on day 1, repeated weekly during radiation.
Interventions
Include brand names, serial numbers and code names to improve search results on the ClinicalTrials.gov web site.
Include brand names, serial numbers and code names to improve search results on the ClinicalTrials.gov web site.
definitive radiotherapy
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Histologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus;
- Localized, nonmetastatic disease (T1-4, N0-1) confirmed by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and CT scan (according to UICC TNM version 6);
- Absence of distant metastasis of solid organ;
- Not suitable for surgery (either for medical reasons or patient's choice);
- Age at diagnosis 18 to 70 years;
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤ 2
- No prior cancer therapy;
- No history of concomitant or previous malignancy;
- Hematologic function: WBC ≥ 4.0×109/L, PLT ≥ 80×109/L, Hb ≥ 10mg/dL;
- Renal function: Cr ≤ 1.25×UNL;
- Hepatic function: BIL ≤ 1.5×UNL, ALT/AST ≤ 2.5×UNL;
- Documented informed consent to participate in the trial.
You may not qualify if:
- Younger than 18 or older than 70 years of age;
- ECOG performance status of 3 or above;
- Other cancer history;
- Previous radiotherapy history;
- Subjects with distant metastases;
- Pregnancy or breast feeding. Women of childbearing age must use effective contraception;
- Serious cardiovascular disease (congestive heart failure, uncontrollable arrhythmia, unstable angina, myocardial infarction, serious heart valve disease, resistant hypertension);
- Evidence of bleeding diathesis or serious infection.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Mian XIlead
Study Sites (1)
Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, China
Related Publications (6)
Ruhstaller T, Widmer L, Schuller JC, Roth A, Hess V, Mingrone W, von Moos R, Borner M, Pestalozzi BC, BalmerMajno S, Koberle D, Terraciano L, Schnider A, Bodis S, Popescu R; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK). Multicenter phase II trial of preoperative induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation with docetaxel and cisplatin for locally advanced esophageal carcinoma (SAKK 75/02). Ann Oncol. 2009 Sep;20(9):1522-1528. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp045. Epub 2009 May 22.
PMID: 19465425BACKGROUNDKoo DH, Park SI, Kim YH, Kim JH, Jung HY, Lee GH, Choi KD, Song HJ, Song HY, Shin JH, Cho KJ, Yoon DH, Kim SB. Phase II study of use of a single cycle of induction chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy containing capecitabine/cisplatin followed by surgery for patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: long-term follow-up data. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2012 Mar;69(3):655-63. doi: 10.1007/s00280-011-1750-5. Epub 2011 Oct 4.
PMID: 21968953BACKGROUNDIlson DH, Minsky BD, Ku GY, Rusch V, Rizk N, Shah M, Kelsen DP, Capanu M, Tang L, Campbell J, Bains M. Phase 2 trial of induction and concurrent chemoradiotherapy with weekly irinotecan and cisplatin followed by surgery for esophageal cancer. Cancer. 2012 Jun 1;118(11):2820-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26591. Epub 2011 Oct 11.
PMID: 21990000BACKGROUNDAjani JA, Xiao L, Roth JA, Hofstetter WL, Walsh G, Komaki R, Liao Z, Rice DC, Vaporciyan AA, Maru DM, Lee JH, Bhutani MS, Eid A, Yao JC, Phan AP, Halpin A, Suzuki A, Taketa T, Thall PF, Swisher SG. A phase II randomized trial of induction chemotherapy versus no induction chemotherapy followed by preoperative chemoradiation in patients with esophageal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2013 Nov;24(11):2844-9. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt339. Epub 2013 Aug 23.
PMID: 23975663BACKGROUNDLiu S, Chen B, Zhu Y, Wang S, Cheng X, Wang R, Hu Y, Liu H, Li Q, Zhang L, Zhao L, Liu M, Xi M. Induction chemotherapy plus chemoradiotherapy in esophageal cancer: long-term results and exploratory analyses of a randomized controlled trial. Oncologist. 2025 Jul 4;30(7):oyae295. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae295.
PMID: 39584557DERIVEDLiu S, Luo L, Zhao L, Zhu Y, Liu H, Li Q, Cai L, Hu Y, Qiu B, Zhang L, Shen J, Yang Y, Liu M, Xi M. Induction chemotherapy followed by definitive chemoradiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy alone in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a randomized phase II trial. Nat Commun. 2021 Jun 29;12(1):4014. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24288-1.
PMID: 34188053DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Meng-Zhong Liu, MD
Sun Yat-sen University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr. Xi
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 19, 2015
First Posted
March 31, 2015
Study Start
May 1, 2015
Primary Completion
September 6, 2017
Study Completion
May 30, 2020
Last Updated
June 2, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-05