NCT02393326

Brief Summary

Objective: To compare success rates of biodentine partial pulpotomy versus formocresol pulpotomy treatment of pulpally exposed lower primary molars. After caries removal resulted in a pulp exposure, the pulp at the exposed area is amputated to a depth of 2 mm. The wound surface is irrigated and dried. After homeostasis is obtained, an assistant drew lots to randomly allocate the case to either the biodentine partial pulpotomy (PP) or the formocresol pulpotomy (FP) group. The follow-up for clinical and radiographic evaluation will be carried out at 6-month intervals.

Trial Health

15
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2018

Typical duration for not_applicable

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 9, 2015

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 19, 2015

Completed
2.8 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2018

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2019

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

March 14, 2018

Status Verified

March 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

March 9, 2015

Last Update Submit

March 12, 2018

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • partial pulpotomy clinical success rate

    Treatment is considered a clinical failure if one or more of the following signs are observed: pain, abscess or sinus opening, tenderness upon percussion, or abnormal tooth mobility. The treatment is regarded successful if clinical evaluation does not indicate any signs of failure.

    6-month intervals, up to 2 years. From date of randomization until the date of first documented failure or up to 24 months

  • partial pulpotomy radiographic success rate

    For radiographic evaluation, the treatment is rated as a failure when one or more of the following signs are present: furcation or periapical radiolucency, pathologic external root resorption, or internal resorption. The treatment is regarded successful if radiographic evaluation does not indicate any signs of failure.

    6-month intervals, up to 2 years. From date of randomization until the date of first documented failure or up to 24 months

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Formocresol pulpotomy clinical success rate

    6-month intervals, up to 2 years. From date of randomization until the date of first documented failure or up to 24 months

  • Formocresol pulpotomy radiographic success rate

    6-month intervals, up to 2 years. From date of randomization until the date of first documented failure or up to 24 months

Study Arms (2)

Partial pulpotomy with biodentine

EXPERIMENTAL

Biodentine is gently applied to the pulp stumps

Procedure: partial pulpotomy with biodentine

Formocresol pulpotomy

OTHER

A cotton pellet moistened with formocresol (1: 5 Buckley's solution) is placed on the amputated pulp for 5 min.

Procedure: Formocresol pulpotomy

Interventions

After caries removal resulted in a pulp exposure, the pulp at the exposed area is amputated to a depth of 2 mm. The wound surface is irrigated and dried. After homeostasis is obtained, biodentine is gently applied to the wound surface, and then covered with reinforced zinc oxide-eugenol

Partial pulpotomy with biodentine

Following removal of the coronal pulp and achievement of homeostasis, a cotton pellet moistened with formocresol (1: 5 Buckley's solution) is placed on the amputated pulp for 5 min. The pulp stumps is then covered by IRM.

Formocresol pulpotomy

Eligibility Criteria

Age3 Years - 7 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • The clinical criteria: primary molar with a deep carious lesion
  • Sufficient tooth structure for restoration with a stainless steel crown
  • No history of spontaneous pain
  • Tenderness to percussion or abnormal mobility
  • Abscess, fistula, or swelling of the gingiva, and with cessation of bleeding after a 2 mm depth of the pulp at the area of the exposure was amputated.
  • The radiographic criteria: a deep carious lesion in close proximity to the pulp without furcation or radicular pathology
  • Obliteration of the pulp and root canal, or internal or external root resorption.
  • Physiologic root resorption, while included in the criteria, could not be more than one-third of the root length.

You may not qualify if:

  • The clinical criteria: history of spontaneous pain
  • Tenderness to percussion or abnormal mobility
  • Abscess, fistula, or swelling of the gingiva, no cessation of bleeding after a 2 mm depth of the pulp at the area of the exposure was amputated.
  • The radiographic criteria: tooth with furcation or radicular pathology
  • Obliteration of the pulp and root canal, or internal or external root resorption.
  • Physiologic root resorption more than one-third of the root length.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Interventions

tricalcium silicate
0

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
pediatric dentist

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 9, 2015

First Posted

March 19, 2015

Study Start

January 1, 2018

Primary Completion

January 1, 2019

Study Completion

January 1, 2020

Last Updated

March 14, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-03