Key Insights

Highlights

Success Rate

90% trial completion (above average)

Clinical Risk Assessment

Based on trial outcomes

Moderate Risk

Score: 40/100

Termination Rate

5.9%

2 terminated out of 34 trials

Success Rate

90.0%

+3.5% vs benchmark

Late-Stage Pipeline

18%

6 trials in Phase 3/4

Results Transparency

6%

1 of 18 completed with results

Key Signals

1 with results90% success

Data Visualizations

Phase Distribution

32Total
Not Applicable (24)
Early P 1 (1)
P 2 (1)
P 3 (2)
P 4 (4)

Trial Status

Completed18
Recruiting4
Unknown4
Not Yet Recruiting3
Terminated2
Withdrawn2

Trial Success Rate

90.0%

Benchmark: 86.5%

Based on 18 completed trials

Clinical Trials (34)

Showing 20 of 20 trials
NCT07522268Phase 3CompletedPrimary

Laser Pulpotomy: a Modern-non Pharmacological Alternate to Ferric Sulphate Pulpotomy

NCT02298504Phase 4Active Not Recruiting

Vital Pulp Treatment in Primary Teeth

NCT07355140Not ApplicableCompleted

Vital Pulp Therapy vs. Root Canal Treatment in Mature Teeth With Irreversible Pulpitis

NCT07312539Completed

Risk Factors on the Long-Term Success of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate Pulpotomy

NCT04863222Phase 4Recruiting

Clinical and Radiographic Success of MTA vs Biodentine

NCT06685640Not ApplicableRecruiting

Comparison of Clinical Success of Stainless Steel Crowns and Zirconia Crowns in Primary Molars

NCT06874062Not ApplicableCompletedPrimary

Evaluation of Primary Tooth Pulpotomy With Resin Modified Calcium Silicate

NCT06871709Not ApplicableNot Yet Recruiting

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Potassium Nitrate in Polycarboxylate Versus Mineral Trioxide Aggregate in Vital Pulpotomy in Primary Molars

NCT06809478Not ApplicableNot Yet Recruiting

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Chitosan Versus Formocresol After Vital Pulpotomy of Primary Molars

NCT06288477Not ApplicableRecruiting

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Vital Pulpotomy Techniques in Primary Molars Using of Premixed Bioactive Bioceramic MTA (Neo-putty) as a Novel Pulpotomy Medication Versus Formocresol

NCT06640205Not ApplicableRecruitingPrimary

Assessment of I-PRF Versus Nano MTA Combined with I-PRF Scaffold in Vital Pulp Therapy in Mature Mandibular First Molars

NCT06219824Phase 3Not Yet RecruitingPrimary

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Bioceramic Putty MTA Versus MTA in Pulpotomy of Immature Permanent Molars

NCT06403306Not ApplicableCompleted

Evaluation of Pulpotomy Success of Different Methods

NCT05297344Not ApplicableCompleted

Clinical Study of the Direct Pulp Capping in Primary Teeth

NCT04909827Phase 4CompletedPrimary

3D-printed Endocrowns Versus Prefabricated Zirconia Crowns in Pulpally-treated Primary Molars

NCT05850780Not ApplicableUnknown

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Laser Photobiomodulation Pulpotomy of Primary Molars in Children

NCT05792748Not ApplicableCompletedPrimary

Comparison of Zinc Oxide Eugenol to Ferric Sulphate Pulpotomy in Primary Teeth

NCT05747300Not ApplicableUnknownPrimary

Wellroot PT Versus MTA in Pulpotomy of Primary Molars

NCT05680285Not ApplicableCompletedPrimary

Evaluation of Low Level Laser Therapy in Primary Tooth Pulpotomy Treatment

NCT05554952Not ApplicableUnknown

Indirect Pulp Capping Versus Pulpotomy With MTA for Treatment of Primary Molars With Deep Caries

Scroll to load more

Research Network

Activity Timeline