Different Effects of Three Recruitment Maneuvers on the Lung Heterogeneity of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
DEOTRMOARDS
Evaluation of Different Effects of Three Recruitment Maneuvers on the Lung Heterogeneity of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
1 other identifier
interventional
93
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is the common disease in clinical, which pathophysiology is a lot of alveolar collapse and heterogeneity. Recruitment maneuver is one of the important therapy for improvement of this phenomenon. The previous research focuses on the hemodynamic and oxygenation effect of recruitment maneuver on the lung of ARDS. Seldom investigators try to find the intuitive change of heterogeneity when recruitment maneuver is implemented. In this study, the investigators compare three recruitment maneuvers on the lung heterogeneity of ARDS.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2014
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 4, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 13, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2016
CompletedMarch 13, 2015
December 1, 2014
1.2 years
February 4, 2015
March 12, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
oxygenation (improvement of oxygenation)
detection of index 3 minutes after lung recruiment (1) PO2/FiO2\>400mmHg or (2)PO2/FiO2+PCO2 ≥ 400mmHg(FiO2=1),(3)the difference between this index before lung recriument and after lung recriument PO2/FiO2\<5%
improvement of oxygenation 3 minutes after lung recruiment
Study Arms (3)
SI recruitment
EXPERIMENTALCompare the effect of three recruitment maneuvers before and after recruitment maneuvers is implemented,SI continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) held at 40 cm H2O for 40 secs.
IP recruitment
EXPERIMENTALCompare the effect of three recruitment maneuvers before and after recruitment maneuvers is implemented,Incremental positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) with a fixed peak pressure (IP), PEEP increased in 5 cm H2O increments (allowing 30 secs/step) from a baseline PEEP of post-trial to 40 cm H2O while decreasing tidal volume to limit peak inspiratory pressure to 40 cm H2O. After CPAP of 40 cm H2O was held for 30 secs, PEEP was decremented in 5-cm H2O steps to the post-RM PEEP setting, while increasing tidal volume toward the baseline value of 10 mL/kg (as the 40 cm H2O peak pressure limit allowed).
PCV recruitment
EXPERIMENTALCompare the effect of three recruitment maneuvers before and after recruitment maneuvers is implemented,PCV peak pressure = 40 cm H2O, inspiratory to expiratory ratio = 1:2, and PEEP level = 15cm H2O for 2 min
Interventions
SI continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) held at 40 cm H2O for 40 secs.
Incremental positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) with a fixed peak pressure (IP), PEEP increased in 5 cm H2O increments (allowing 30 secs/step) from a baseline PEEP of post-trial to 40 cm H2O while decreasing tidal volume to limit peak inspiratory pressure to 40 cm H2O. After CPAP of 40 cm H2O was held for 30 secs, PEEP was decremented in 5-cm H2O steps to the post-RM PEEP setting, while increasing tidal volume toward the baseline value of 10 mL/kg (as the 40 cm H2O peak pressure limit allowed).
PCV peak pressure = 40 cm H2O, inspiratory to expiratory ratio = 1:2, and PEEP level = 15cm H2O for 2 min
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients who are severe or moderate ARDS
- Patients who have signed ICF
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who are younger than 18 years old or older than 75 years old
- Patients whose vital signs are unstable
- Patients who are in other clinical trails
- Patients who are pregnant
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Southeast University, Chinalead
- Zhongda Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Zhongda hospital, Southeast University
Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210009, China
Zhongda hospital, Southeast University
Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210009, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Yingzi Huang
southeast univerity, China
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 4, 2015
First Posted
March 13, 2015
Study Start
November 1, 2014
Primary Completion
January 1, 2016
Study Completion
January 1, 2016
Last Updated
March 13, 2015
Record last verified: 2014-12