Lidocaine for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
Predicting Individual Response to Analgesic Treatment in Painful Diabetic Neuropathy
1 other identifier
interventional
34
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Diabetic nerve pain \[painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy\] is a common medical problem with few reliably effective treatments. There is some evidence that sensory testing may help determine how individuals will respond to analgesic therapy. In this study, the investigators are evaluating the relationship between sensory testing and subject response to lidocaine infusion therapy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable diabetes
Started Feb 2015
Longer than P75 for not_applicable diabetes
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 3, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 16, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 17, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 17, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 30, 2019
CompletedNovember 15, 2019
November 1, 2019
3.7 years
February 3, 2015
October 11, 2019
November 4, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Spontaneous Pain at 60-120 Minutes After Lidocaine Infusion Initiated (Assessed on 0-10 NRS)
Spontaneous pain will be assessed on numerical rating scale NRS (0= no pain, 10=worst pain imaginable) prior to infusion and then repeatedly for 120 minutes. The outcome measure will use the average of pain intensity measured at timepoints in the 60-120 min range after beginning of infusion. The mean %change in pain (from baseline) will be compared between lidocaine and placebo arms.
Baseline compared to 60-120 minutes after starting the infusion
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Evoked Mechanical and Thermal Sensation at Baseline and 60 Minutes After Infusion Initiation.
- 60 minutes (baseline) and + 60 minutes of initiating infusion
NPSI (Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory) Descriptors of Pain at Baseline and 60 Min After Infusion
Baseline to 60 minutes of initiating infusion
Change in Spontaneous Pain Intensity as a Function of Baseline MPT
baseline to 60-120 minutes after starting the infusion
Change in Spontaneous Pain Intensity as a Function of Baseline HPT
Baseline to 60-120 minutes after starting the infusion
Study Arms (2)
Normal saline infusion then lidocaine infusion
PLACEBO COMPARATORIntravenous infusion of normal saline over a 40 minute period. second intervention: Intravenous infusion of lidocaine \[5mg/kg\] over a 40 minute period.
Lidocaine infusion, then normal saline infusion
ACTIVE COMPARATORIntravenous infusion of lidocaine \[5mg/kg\] over a 40 minute period. second intervention: Intravenous infusion of normal saline over a 40 minute period.
Interventions
lidocaine is a sodium channel blocker/analgesic. It is approved for intravenous administration for cardiac arrhythmias.
Normal saline, approved for hypovolemia, and homeostasis.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥18;
- Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus (Fasting Plasma Glucose \> 126 mg/dL and/or HbA1C \>6.5%);
- Distal symmetric pain in lower extremities with duration of more than 3 months;
- Presence of either numbness or at least 1 sensory disturbance (increased or decreased sensitivity) in the feet.
- Spontaneous pain with intensity of ≥ 4 on 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS).
You may not qualify if:
- Not giving consent to participate in the study;
- Unable to complete self-report pain questionnaire;
- History of moderate to severe renal or liver failure;
- History of other central or peripheral neurologic disorders;
- History of cardiac arrhythmias;
- Contraindication to intravenous lidocaine;
- Pregnancy or lactation.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Washington University School of Medicine/Barnes Jewish Hospital
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Simon Haroutounian
- Organization
- Washington University in St. Louis
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Simon Haroutounian, PhD
Department of Anesthesiology, WUSTL
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 3, 2015
First Posted
February 16, 2015
Study Start
February 1, 2015
Primary Completion
October 17, 2018
Study Completion
October 17, 2018
Last Updated
November 15, 2019
Results First Posted
October 30, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share