NCT02354287

Brief Summary

There is no consensus method for removal of diminutive (5mm) to small(6-9mm) colorectal polyps at colonoscopy. Neither the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy or the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy have guidelines for the removal of these polyps, despite the fact that around 90% of lesions removed by polypectomy at colonoscopy are diminutive to small. Multiple techniques are used for polyp removal, especially diminutive lesions. These include either forceps, both hot and cold, as well as snare with electrocautery or cold snare. Forceps utilises shearing force to grasp tissue and remove it, with the hot method passing a current through the grasper to essentially burn tissue. Snare is the use of a small metal loop placed and tightened at the base of polyps to cut through the tissue either straight away in a cold method or with electrocautery where a small current is passed through the loop to assist cutting through tissue. Surveys of Colonoscopists and Gastroenterologists in Australia and the United States show that the choice of method used for diminutive to small polyps is highly variable with cold snaring marginally favoured.Studies into polypectomy techniques are limited and it is clear that additional data and the review of polypectomy methods needs to be undertaken in order determine the optimal method for the removal of diminutive and small colorectal polyps. A technique is used at the Gloucestershire National Health Service (NHS) trust involving a submucosal pre injection with a standard solution then the use of cold forceps for removal of polyps ≤7mm. This appears to be both very safe and highly effective method for the removal of these lesions compared to other techniques. No formal published studies have been completed to evaluate this method at national and international levels. We propose a study to evaluate the effectiveness, safety and costs of this method.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
64

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2015

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 13, 2015

Completed
19 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2015

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 3, 2015

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 25, 2015

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 25, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

April 13, 2017

Status Verified

April 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

January 13, 2015

Last Update Submit

April 12, 2017

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Histological complete resection rate (CRR) using a pre injection lift and cold forceps for polypectomy of polyps ≤7mm.

    Gastrointestinal pathologist will assess histology of polyp resected then assess the polypectomy site rim that was resected at EMR for any evidence of residual polyp that was not visible to the colonoscopist.

    Within one week of patients colonoscopy

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • The number of bites required for complete visual resection of these polyps and the time taken from the beginning of pre injection needle insertion till complete resection.

    intraoperative during colonoscopy and analysed within one month of last patient recruitment

Other Outcomes (3)

  • The polyp retrieval rate of this method.

    intraoperative during patient colonoscopy and analysed within one month of last patients recruitment.

  • Immediate or delayed complications from this technique.

    intraoperative and after one week.

  • An overall comparison of this polypectomy method compared to other methods used for diminutive and small polyps.

    2 months post completion of recruitment.

Study Arms (1)

Patients having outpatient Colonoscopy.

Patients with Polyps ≤7mm that are deemed appropriate to be removed by cold forceps polypectomy with pre lift

Procedure: Cold forceps polypectomy with pre lift

Interventions

Polyps ≤7mm will be included in the study if deemed appropriate by the colonoscopist.. These polyps will be resected with cold forceps after pre injection into the submucosa with a few millilitres of pre injection solution (19 ml gelofusine, 1ml 1:10000 adrenaline and 1ml indigo carmine). Polyps are grasped with the cold forceps and pulled away from the rest of the colonic mucosa. Attempt will be made to remove polyps with single attempt with the forceps however several grasps may be required for complete visual resection of the polyp. The polypectomy site and a 5mm rim of normal appearing tissue will then be resected with endomucosal resection (EMR) using conventional snare method. This is to ascertain if there is any residual polyp tissue.

Also known as: polypectomy
Patients having outpatient Colonoscopy.

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 90 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Residents from within Gloucestershire, United Kingdom whom have been referred for a Colonoscopy through either. 1. Bowel cancer screening program or outpatient referral 2. Outpatient clinics 3. Inpatient referral

You may qualify if:

  • Patients from Cheltenham General Hospital and Royal Gloucestershire Hospitals that have been scheduled for colonoscopy through our outpatient clinics or inpatient consult service will be prospectively recruited prior to their Colonoscopy.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients will be excluded if:
  • They are under the age of 18.
  • They do not have capacity to consent for the Colonoscopy as determined at the time of procedural admission by the trained admitting endoscopy nurse. If a patient is deemed to lack capacity by the referring doctor or admitting nurse this will also be assessed by the colonoscopist. Both the colonoscopist and admitting nurses have been trained to assess capacity,that is whether a persons mind is affected at the time of the procedure in such a way that they are unable to make a decision. There are multiple reasons as to why an individuals brain or mind may be altered such as medications, mental illness or dementia.
  • There is a history of Inflammatory Bowel Disease
  • Identified coagulopathy with PT\>1.4 or thrombocytopenia with Platelets \<80 on any bloods collected within routine clinical practice within the past 4 weeks. This will not be an additional procedure and these bloods are routinely taken on patients where coagulopathy or thrombocytopenia is a concern such as patients on long term Warfarin or with chronic liver disease. These patients are identified by Endoscopy nursing staff in pre assessment work up. Routine haematology is not taken as part of a standard assessment for outpatient endoscopy.
  • Taking dual anti platelet therapy or pharmacological anti coagulation.
  • Bowel preparation is deemed poor by colonoscopist.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Cheltenham General Hospital

Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, GL53 7AN, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (24)

  • Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, O'Brien MJ, Gottlieb LS, Sternberg SS, Waye JD, Schapiro M, Bond JH, Panish JF, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med. 1993 Dec 30;329(27):1977-81. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199312303292701.

    PMID: 8247072BACKGROUND
  • Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O'Brien MJ, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, van Ballegooijen M, Hankey BF, Shi W, Bond JH, Schapiro M, Panish JF, Stewart ET, Waye JD. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med. 2012 Feb 23;366(8):687-96. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1100370.

    PMID: 22356322BACKGROUND
  • Atkin WS, Cook CF, Cuzick J, Edwards R, Northover JM, Wardle J; UK Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening Trial Investigators. Single flexible sigmoidoscopy screening to prevent colorectal cancer: baseline findings of a UK multicentre randomised trial. Lancet. 2002 Apr 13;359(9314):1291-300. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08268-5.

    PMID: 11965274BACKGROUND
  • Farrar WD, Sawhney MS, Nelson DB, Lederle FA, Bond JH. Colorectal cancers found after a complete colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006 Oct;4(10):1259-64. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.07.012. Epub 2006 Sep 25.

    PMID: 16996804BACKGROUND
  • Martinez ME, Baron JA, Lieberman DA, Schatzkin A, Lanza E, Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Jiang R, Ahnen DJ, Bond JH, Church TR, Robertson DJ, Smith-Warner SA, Jacobs ET, Alberts DS, Greenberg ER. A pooled analysis of advanced colorectal neoplasia diagnoses after colonoscopic polypectomy. Gastroenterology. 2009 Mar;136(3):832-41. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.12.007. Epub 2008 Dec 9.

    PMID: 19171141BACKGROUND
  • Pabby A, Schoen RE, Weissfeld JL, Burt R, Kikendall JW, Lance P, Shike M, Lanza E, Schatzkin A. Analysis of colorectal cancer occurrence during surveillance colonoscopy in the dietary Polyp Prevention Trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 Mar;61(3):385-91. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)02765-8.

    PMID: 15758908BACKGROUND
  • Leung K, Pinsky P, Laiyemo AO, Lanza E, Schatzkin A, Schoen RE. Ongoing colorectal cancer risk despite surveillance colonoscopy: the Polyp Prevention Trial Continued Follow-up Study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Jan;71(1):111-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.05.010. Epub 2009 Jul 31.

    PMID: 19647250BACKGROUND
  • Lieberman D, Moravec M, Holub J, Michaels L, Eisen G. Polyp size and advanced histology in patients undergoing colonoscopy screening: implications for CT colonography. Gastroenterology. 2008 Oct;135(4):1100-5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.06.083. Epub 2008 Jul 3.

    PMID: 18691580BACKGROUND
  • Regula J, Rupinski M, Kraszewska E, Polkowski M, Pachlewski J, Orlowska J, Nowacki MP, Butruk E. Colonoscopy in colorectal-cancer screening for detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med. 2006 Nov 2;355(18):1863-72. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa054967.

    PMID: 17079760BACKGROUND
  • Chandran S, Parker F, Vaughan R, Efthymiou M. The current practice standard for colonoscopy in Australia. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Mar;79(3):473-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.10.050. Epub 2013 Dec 12.

    PMID: 24332081BACKGROUND
  • Singh N, Harrison M, Rex DK. A survey of colonoscopic polypectomy practices among clinical gastroenterologists. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004 Sep;60(3):414-8. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)01808-5.

    PMID: 15332033BACKGROUND
  • Repici A, Hassan C, Vitetta E, Ferrara E, Manes G, Gullotti G, Princiotta A, Dulbecco P, Gaffuri N, Bettoni E, Pagano N, Rando G, Strangio G, Carlino A, Romeo F, de Paula Pessoa Ferreira D, Zullo A, Ridola L, Malesci A. Safety of cold polypectomy for <10mm polyps at colonoscopy: a prospective multicenter study. Endoscopy. 2012 Jan;44(1):27-31. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1291387. Epub 2011 Nov 28.

    PMID: 22125197BACKGROUND
  • Lee CK, Shim JJ, Jang JY. Cold snare polypectomy vs. Cold forceps polypectomy using double-biopsy technique for removal of diminutive colorectal polyps: a prospective randomized study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Oct;108(10):1593-600. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.302. Epub 2013 Sep 17.

    PMID: 24042189BACKGROUND
  • Deenadayalu VP, Rex DK. Colon polyp retrieval after cold snaring. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 Aug;62(2):253-6. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(05)00376-7.

    PMID: 16046990BACKGROUND
  • Komeda Y, Suzuki N, Sarah M, Thomas-Gibson S, Vance M, Fraser C, Patel K, Saunders BP. Factors associated with failed polyp retrieval at screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Mar;77(3):395-400. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.10.007. Epub 2012 Dec 1.

    PMID: 23211749BACKGROUND
  • Efthymiou M, Taylor AC, Desmond PV, Allen PB, Chen RY. Biopsy forceps is inadequate for the resection of diminutive polyps. Endoscopy. 2011 Apr;43(4):312-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1256086. Epub 2011 Mar 16.

    PMID: 21412704BACKGROUND
  • Jung YS, Park JH, Kim HJ, Cho YK, Sohn CI, Jeon WK, Kim BI, Sohn JH, Park DI. Complete biopsy resection of diminutive polyps. Endoscopy. 2013 Dec;45(12):1024-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1344394. Epub 2013 Aug 6.

    PMID: 23921846BACKGROUND
  • Metz AJ, Moss A, McLeod D, Tran K, Godfrey C, Chandra A, Bourke MJ. A blinded comparison of the safety and efficacy of hot biopsy forceps electrocauterization and conventional snare polypectomy for diminutive colonic polypectomy in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Mar;77(3):484-90. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.09.014. Epub 2012 Nov 27.

    PMID: 23199650BACKGROUND
  • Buchner AM, Guarner-Argente C, Ginsberg GG. Outcomes of EMR of defiant colorectal lesions directed to an endoscopy referral center. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Aug;76(2):255-63. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.02.060. Epub 2012 May 31.

    PMID: 22657404BACKGROUND
  • Church JM. Experience in the endoscopic management of large colonic polyps. ANZ J Surg. 2003 Dec;73(12):988-95. doi: 10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.t01-23-.x.

    PMID: 14632888BACKGROUND
  • Ferrara F, Luigiano C, Ghersi S, Fabbri C, Bassi M, Landi P, Polifemo AM, Billi P, Cennamo V, Consolo P, Alibrandi A, D'Imperio N. Efficacy, safety and outcomes of 'inject and cut' endoscopic mucosal resection for large sessile and flat colorectal polyps. Digestion. 2010;82(4):213-20. doi: 10.1159/000284397. Epub 2010 Jun 24.

    PMID: 20588036BACKGROUND
  • Moss A, Bourke MJ, Williams SJ, Hourigan LF, Brown G, Tam W, Singh R, Zanati S, Chen RY, Byth K. Endoscopic mucosal resection outcomes and prediction of submucosal cancer from advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia. Gastroenterology. 2011 Jun;140(7):1909-18. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.02.062. Epub 2011 Mar 8.

    PMID: 21392504BACKGROUND
  • Ichise Y, Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y, Tanaka N. Prospective randomized comparison of cold snare polypectomy and conventional polypectomy for small colorectal polyps. Digestion. 2011;84(1):78-81. doi: 10.1159/000323959. Epub 2011 Apr 14.

    PMID: 21494037BACKGROUND
  • Warren JL, Klabunde CN, Mariotto AB, Meekins A, Topor M, Brown ML, Ransohoff DF. Adverse events after outpatient colonoscopy in the Medicare population. Ann Intern Med. 2009 Jun 16;150(12):849-57, W152. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-12-200906160-00008.

    PMID: 19528563BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Sam A O'Connor, FRACP

    Advanced Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Fellow

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 13, 2015

First Posted

February 3, 2015

Study Start

February 1, 2015

Primary Completion

September 25, 2015

Study Completion

September 25, 2015

Last Updated

April 13, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-04

Locations