Comparison of Cold Biopsy Forceps vs Cold Snare for Diminutive Colorectal Polyp Removal
BIOPANS
1 other identifier
interventional
126
1 country
1
Brief Summary
European guidelines recommend the use of cold snare polypectomy (CSP) for removal of diminutive colorectal polyps (DCP)(5 mm or less). However, for DCP \< 4 mm cold biopsy forceps (CBF) may be optional. Moreover, CBF remains the endoscopist's technique of choice for polyp resection and CSP is associated with a failure of specimen retrieval for histology in up to 6.8% of cases. In this study, the investigators aimed to compare the efficacy of CSP with CBF for removal of DCP in routine colonoscopy
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2017
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 5, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 3, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 3, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 25, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 27, 2021
CompletedFebruary 1, 2021
January 1, 2021
1.7 years
January 25, 2021
January 27, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The primary objective of the study is to compare CBF and CSP in terms of efficacy. The primary end-point is the rate of histological complete resection by anatomopathological examination.
Complete histological resection was defined as the absence of visualized residual polyp after saline irrigation as well as negative biopsies of the polypectomy site
through study completion, an average of 2 years.
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Specimen retrieval rate (% time of polypectomy)
through study completion, an average of 2 years.
Procedure time ( overall time between introduction and removal of colonoscope)
through study completion, an average of 2 years.
Procedure related adverse events will be collected (adverse events : %, number of event for each groupe) during the procedure or during the follow up period (28 days).
All patients will be followed-up until 28 days post-colonoscopy.
Study Arms (2)
Cold biopsy forceps (CBF)
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will be allocated to the CBF arm after randomization (1:1)
Cold snare polypectomy (CSP)
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will be allocated to the CSP arm after randomization (1:1)
Interventions
All polypectomy procedures will be standardized amongst the study centers. Endoscopists with a minimal experience of at least 50 CBF and CSP performed the polypectomies CBF : The CBF will be performed using a standard biopsy forceps (Gluton Life ® Life Partners). Multiple biopsies bites were taken until complete resection (as many as needed).
All polypectomy procedures will be standardized amongst the study centers. Endoscopists with a minimal experience of at least 50 CBF and CSP performed the polypectomies CSP : The CSB procedure will be performed using a 9 mm cold snare (Exacto ® Life Partners). One to two mm of normal surrounding mucosa will be ensnared around the base of the polyp, followed by mechanical excision without electrocautery
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Routine colonoscopy
- Patient older than 18 years
- at least one polyp measuring ≤ 5 mm
You may not qualify if:
- inflammatory bowel disease
- polyposis syndrome, pregnancy
- inability to provide informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Gabriel RAHMIlead
Study Sites (1)
Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou 20, rue Leblanc
Paris, 75015, France
Related Publications (1)
Perrod G, Perez-Cuadrado-Robles E, Coron E, Pioche M, Becq A, Etchepare N, Danan D, Musquer N, Dray X, Laquiere A, Jais B, Broudin C, Benosman H, Cellier C, Rahmi G. Comparison of cold biopsy forceps vs cold snare for diminutive colorectal polyp removal: A multicenter non-inferiority randomized controlled trial. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2022 Mar;46(3):101867. doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2022.101867. Epub 2022 Jan 14.
PMID: 35038578DERIVED
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investagator, Medical Doctor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 25, 2021
First Posted
January 27, 2021
Study Start
October 5, 2017
Primary Completion
July 3, 2019
Study Completion
July 3, 2020
Last Updated
February 1, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-01