NCT02335138

Brief Summary

The proposed research aims to address the question: Compared to the current standard of care for home-based HIV tests, in which persons conduct and interpret HIV tests without counseling, does the addition of video conferencing with a remote counselor increase health-enhancing, protective behaviors among male-male couples and facilitate linkage to care for those who test positive?

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
800

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2016

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 7, 2015

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 9, 2015

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2016

Completed
3.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 30, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 30, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

October 21, 2019

Status Verified

October 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

3.5 years

First QC Date

January 7, 2015

Last Update Submit

October 18, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

HIVMSMCouplesHome TestingSexual Agreements

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Process and use of communal coping - Outcome Efficacy to Reduce HIV Threat

    Based on Lewis's model Couple's Interdependence Theory, we will measure process and use of communal coping or how couples work together and make decisions together to reduce the health threat. We created three subscales to capture the full range of outcome efficacy related to these three processes of communal coping. For the first subscale, Joint Effort, we used the stem, "My partner and I believe that 'working together' versus on our own is an effective strategy;" for the second subscale, Communication, we used the stem, "Communicating with my partner is an effective strategy for;" and for the third subscale, Planning and Decision-making, we used the stem, "My partner and I making decisions together rather than separately is an effective strategy." The items for each of the three subscales were the same as the items used for the Preference for Sexual Health Outcomes scale.

    6 months

  • Process and use of communal coping - Couple Efficacy to Reduce HIV Threat

    Based on Lewis's model Couple's Interdependence Theory, we will measure process and use of communal coping or how couples work together and make decisions together to reduce the health threat. Couple efficacy is defined as a couple's confidence that together they can engage in communal coping efforts. We developed three subscales in parallel to Outcome Efficacy to Reduce HIV Threat Scale: Joint Effort, Communication, and Planning and Decision-making.

    6 months

  • Process and use of communal coping - Communal Coping to Reduce HIV Threat

    Based on Lewis's model Couple's Interdependence Theory, we will measure process and use of communal coping or how couples work together and make decisions together to reduce the health threat. Scale: We developed three subscales in parallel to the Outcome Efficacy Scale and the Couple Efficacy Scale: Joint Effort, Communication, and Planning and Decision-making. All three subscales used the same six items from these other scales to capture the managing of reducing the health threat of HIV, but the stems were different.

    6 months

  • Changes in Sexual Agreements

    We measure changes in sexual agreements using questions from previous studies of MSM couples' sexual agreements. Participants will be asked which of the following best describes their current sexual agreement with their main partner: "both of us cannot have sex with outside partners," "we can have sex with outside partners, without any conditions or restrictions," "we can have sex with outside partners, but with conditions or restrictions," and "we do not have an agreement." Additional items about agreements will further assess whether couples permitted (or did not permit) that certain sexual behaviors, namely UAI and oral sex, could occur with outside partners. In follow-up surveys, participants will be asked whether their agreement changed, and if so, to re-categorize their agreement type.

    6 months

  • Changes in Sexual Behavior

    We measure changes in sexual behavior using behavioral measures adapted from the NHBS behavioral inventory and previously used with thousands of MSM by our team will collect information both on sexual behaviors with the main sex partner in the 3 months before the interview, and on sexual behaviors with all sex partners outside the relationship. For sex with the main partner, men will be asked to estimate the number of anal sex acts with the main partner, and the number of those acts that were condom-protected. For outside the relationship, we will ask a series of questions about each outside partner, including HIV status of that partner (if known), whether the sex outside the relationship was disclosed to the main partner, the number and type of sex acts with each outside partner, and the proportion of those sex acts that were protected by condoms.

    6 months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Linkage to Care

    6 months

Other Outcomes (8)

  • Predisposing couple factors - Perceived Severity of HIV

    6 months

  • Predisposing couple factors - Preferences for General Lifestyle

    6 months

  • Predisposing couple factors - Preferences for General Sexual Health

    6 months

  • +5 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Control Arm

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Each participant will receive an at-home test kit and will be asked to test and return results to investigator.

Behavioral: at-home test kit

Intervention Arm

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Each participant will receive an at-home test kit and will be asked to take the test in conjunction with an online CHTC session.

Behavioral: Couples HIV Testing and Counseling (CHTC, CVCT)

Interventions

Male couples randomized to the experimental group (Couples HIV Testing and Counseling, CHTC/CVCT) will receive HIV counseling and testing as a couple via an online, HIPPA-compliant videoconferencing service. The dyad-centered session will last less than one hour and focus on couples agreement, prevention strategies, and/or linkage to HIV care, depending on each couple's test results. Participants will complete follow-up surveys at 3 and 6 months post-testing.

Also known as: CHTC, CVCT
Intervention Arm

Male couples in the control group will receive test kits, but will not receive any testing intervention. Once individual results are reported,participants will be contacted via phone by study staff with options for referrals to services for the reactive partner(s). Participants will complete follow-up surveys at 3 and 6 months post-testing.

Control Arm

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexmale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Male sex at birth
  • Male gender
  • or older
  • In a relationship with a male sexual partner of duration six months or longer
  • Negative or unknown HIV status and not having tested in the last 6 months, with a partner meeting the same criteria OR in a sero-discordant with the negative/unknown partner reporting not having tested in the past 6 months
  • No recent (past year) severe intimate partner violence (IPV) reported within the couple. IPV will be determined by responses to the below questions, in addition to parallel questions addressing perpetration of the specified acts:
  • Excluding consensual acts such as mutually agreed upon BDSM, in the past year, how many times has \[your partner\] punched, hit, or slapped you?
  • Excluding consensual acts such as mutually agreed upon BDSM, in the past year, how many times has \[your partner\] kicked you?
  • Excluding consensual acts such as mutually agreed upon BDSM, in the past year, how many times has \[your partner\] used force or threats of force to make you do something sexual that you didn't want to do?
  • Excluding consensual acts such as mutually agreed upon BDSM, in the past year, how many times has \[your partner\] raped you? \[Follow up question: Do you feel safe in your relationship?\]
  • Willingness to have HIV test kits delivered to a home address they provide
  • Willingness to be tested for HIV with one's male sexual partner
  • Willingness to be randomized to either study arm
  • Willingness and ability to participate in video-based counseling (must have a computer or tablet with video and audio capabilities, Internet access)

You may not qualify if:

  • Sex at birth other than male
  • Gender other than male
  • Either partner aged 17 or younger
  • Does not have a main male sex partner or has a main male sex partner of relationship duration less than 6 months
  • Both partners within the couple report known, positive HIV status OR one or both partners reports having tested negative for HIV within 6 months
  • Either partner reports experiencing or perpetrating intimate partner violence within the couple within the past year
  • Either partner expresses unwillingness to have HIV test kits delivered to a home address
  • Either partner expresses unwillingness to test for HIV together with his male sexual partner
  • Either partner expresses unwillingness to be randomized
  • Unwillingness or inability to participate in video-based counseling

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Michigan Center for Sexuality & Health Disparities (SexLab)

Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Stephenson R, Freeland R, Sullivan SP, Riley E, Johnson BA, Mitchell J, McFarland D, Sullivan PS. Home-Based HIV Testing and Counseling for Male Couples (Project Nexus): A Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2017 May 30;6(5):e101. doi: 10.2196/resprot.7341.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Counselingchitinase C

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Mental Health ServicesBehavioral Disciplines and ActivitiesCommunity Health ServicesHealth ServicesHealth Care Facilities Workforce and Services

Study Officials

  • Rob Stephenson, PhD

    University of Michigan School of Nursing Department of Health Behavior and Biological Sciences

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 7, 2015

First Posted

January 9, 2015

Study Start

April 1, 2016

Primary Completion

September 30, 2019

Study Completion

September 30, 2019

Last Updated

October 21, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations