TYRO Couples Project Study
Impact Evaluation of the TYRO Couples Project
1 other identifier
interventional
820
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study uses an RCT design with repeated measures to test the impact of two different delivery formats for the TYRO Couples curriculum. Eligible study participants are males or females who are at least 18 years of age and within 9 months of release from incarceration. Incarcerated participants randomly assigned to the treatment group receive the TYRO Couples curriculum in-person, whereas those assigned to the comparison group experience an on-demand format. Study results that show no discernable differences in outcomes between groups will make it easier to serve more participants because service delivery formats can accommodate different life circumstances and preferences.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2023
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 23, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 4, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 11, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 15, 2025
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 19, 2025
CompletedSeptember 19, 2025
September 1, 2025
1.6 years
February 23, 2022
July 1, 2025
September 9, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Primary Outcome Measure 1: Employment Attitudes
What is the impact of on-demand delivery (treatment) compared to in-person delivery of the TYRO Couples curriculum (control) on employment attitudes six-months after enrollment? * 4 survey items independently measure the reported frequency of agreement with key co-parenting behaviors using categories on a 5-point scale (1 'Strongly Disagree', 2 'Disagree', 3 'Neither Agree nor Disagree', 4 'Agree', 5 'Strongly Agree'). * Higher scores on 4 items indicate better outcomes (ex. - I can overcome almost any challenge to get a decent job.) Subscales were formed to add the four survey items together and were divided by four. The subscale ranges from 1-5 (the lowest someone can score is 1, the highest someone can score is 5-which is most favorable.
baseline to 6-month follow-up
Primary Outcome Measure 2: Healthy Financial Attitudes
What is the impact of on-demand delivery (treatment) compared to in-person delivery of the TYRO Couples curriculum (control) on financial attitudes six months after enrollment? * 3 survey items measure the reported agreement for key financial attitudes using categories on a 5-point employment attitudes scale (1 'Strongly Disagree', 2 'Disagree', 3 'Neither Agree Nor Disagree', 4 'Agree', 5 'Strongly Agree'). * Higher scores on 3 items are negative (ex. - I am overwhelmed when I think about my financial situation.) Subscales were formed to add the three survey items together and were divided by three. The subscale ranges from 1-5 (the lowest someone can score is 1-which is most favorable, the highest someone can score is 5.
baseline to 6-month follow-up
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Secondary Outcome Measure 1: Partner Relationship Attitudes
baseline to immediately after program completion, up to 5 weeks
Primary Outcome Measure 2: Relationship With Partner Behaviors
baseline to 6-month follow-up
Study Arms (2)
Treatment-On Demand Format
EXPERIMENTALTreatment group participants receive TYRO Couples curriculum in an on-demand format that is delivered in five 2-hour weekly sessions for a total of 10 hours.
Control-Virtual or In-Person Format
EXPERIMENTALControl group participants receive TYRO Couples curriculum in a live format (virtual or in-person) that is delivered in five 2-hour weekly sessions for a total of 10 hours.
Interventions
Treatment group participants receive TYRO Couples curriculum in an on-demand format that is delivered in five 2-hour weekly sessions for a total of 10 hours.
Control group participants receive TYRO Couples curriculum in a live format (virtual or in-person) that is delivered in five 2-hour weekly sessions for a total of 10 hours.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or Female Adult (age 18 and older)
- Incarcerated
- Within 9 months of release in OH
You may not qualify if:
- Minor (under the age of 18)
- Not incarcerated
- Incarcerated but not within 9 months of release in OH
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Midwest Evaluation & Researchlead
- The RIDGE Projectcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
The RIDGE Project
McClure, Ohio, 43534, United States
Related Publications (15)
Allred, S. L., Harrison, L. D., & O'Connell, D. J. (2013). Self-Efficacy: An important aspect of prison-based learning. The Prison Journal, 93(2), 211 - 233. doi:10.1177/0032885512472964
BACKGROUNDBandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977 Mar;84(2):191-215. doi: 10.1037//0033-295x.84.2.191. No abstract available.
PMID: 847061BACKGROUNDChou, S., & Liu, C. (2005). Learning effectiveness in a web-based virtual learning environment: A learner-control perspective. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(1), 65 - 76.
BACKGROUNDCohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd Edition. Routledge.
BACKGROUNDFoster, H., & Hagan, J. (2009). The Mass Incarceration of Parents in America: Issues of Race/ Ethnicity, Collateral Damage to Children, and Prisoner Reentry. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 623(1), 179-194. doi:10.1177/0002716208331123
BACKGROUNDFrisco ML, Muller C, Frank K. Parents' Union Dissolution and Adolescents' School Performance: Comparing Methodological Approaches. J Marriage Fam. 2007 Aug 1;69(3):721-741. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00402.x.
PMID: 20300482BACKGROUNDJohnson, B., Wubbenhorst, W., Schroeder, C., & Corcoran, K. E. (2014). Stronger Families, Stronger Society: An Analysis of the RIDGE Project, Inc. Baylor University. Waco, TX: Baylor Institute for Studies of Religion.
BACKGROUNDLa Vigne, N. G., Naser, R., Brooks, L. E., & Castro, J. L. (2005, November). Examining the effect of incarceration and in-prison. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 21(4), 314 - 335. doi:10.1177/1043986205281727
BACKGROUNDMiller, S. L., Nunnally, E. W., & Wackman, D. B. (1976). A communication training program for couples. Social Casework, 57(1), 9 - 18.
BACKGROUNDManning WD. Cohabitation and Child Wellbeing. Future Child. 2015 Fall;25(2):51-66. doi: 10.1353/foc.2015.0012.
PMID: 26929590BACKGROUNDShepherd, M. (2011). A statistical Analysis of Client Data from the Keeping Families and Inmates Together in Harmony (Keeping FAITH) Program for the RIDGE Project. Emporia, KS: Midwest Evaluation and Research.
BACKGROUNDSiennick SE, Stewart EA, Staff J. EXPLAINING THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN INCARCERATION AND DIVORCE. Criminology. 2014 Aug;52(3):371-398. doi: 10.1111/1745-9125.12040.
PMID: 25598544BACKGROUNDVisher, C. A., Debus-Sherrill, D., & Yahner, J. (2011). Employment after prison: A longitudinal study of former prisoners. Justice Quarterly, 28(5), 698 - 718. doi:10.1080/07418825.2010.535553
BACKGROUNDWestern B, Braga AA, Davis J, Sirois C. Stress and Hardship after Prison. AJS. 2015 Mar;120(5):1512-47. doi: 10.1086/681301.
PMID: 26421345BACKGROUNDWildeman, C. (2014). How the criminal justice system shapes social inequality and the capacity of citizens: Parental Incarceration, child homelessness, and the invisible consequences of mass imprisonment. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 651(1), 74-296.
BACKGROUND
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Midwest Evaluation and Research
- Organization
- Midwest Evaluation and Research
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Matt D Shepherd, PhD
Midwest Evaluation & Research
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 23, 2022
First Posted
March 4, 2022
Study Start
April 11, 2023
Primary Completion
November 30, 2024
Study Completion
August 15, 2025
Last Updated
September 19, 2025
Results First Posted
August 19, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
All participant data will be confidential and aggregated. No individual participant data will be released unless requested by the courts. This study looks at data as a whole.