Days in Motion: A Planning Intervention Study With Couples to Enhance Daily Physical Activity
DiM
1 other identifier
interventional
346
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Regular physical activity is one prominent health-protective behaviour which might increase with the help of self-regulatory strategies such as action planning. The aim of this randomised controlled trial is to examine changes in daily moderate physical activity in couples following (a) a dyadic planning intervention, (b) an individual planning intervention or (c) a no-planning control condition. Changes in daily physical activity will be examined over a period of one year. It is assumed that target persons from couples receiving a dyadic planning intervention will show greater increases in daily physical activity than target persons from couples receiving an individual planning intervention. For couples receiving a dyadic planning intervention or an individual planning intervention, it is hypothesized that target persons will show higher increases in daily physical activity than target persons from couples participating in the no-planning control condition.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Mar 2013
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 30, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 16, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2016
CompletedJanuary 6, 2016
January 1, 2016
1.9 years
September 30, 2013
January 5, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Physical activity
Target persons' change in moderate daily physical activity (in minutes) from baseline (T0) until 6-weeks (T3) following the intervention will be assessed by an accelerometer device. At each assessment, accelerometer devices will be worn for 7 days.
six weeks post intervention
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Cardiorespiratory fitness
one year post intervention
Dyadic action planning
one year post intervention
Individual action planning
one year post intervention
Physical activity
one year post intervention
Physical activity
one year post intervention
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Dyadic planning intervention
EXPERIMENTALA general motivational treatment is provided to each participant. For randomly assigned couples, randomly selected target persons form action plans to increase daily physical activity together with their partners.
Individual planning intervention
ACTIVE COMPARATORA general motivational treatment is provided to each participant. For randomly assigned couples, target persons form action plans individually to increase daily physical activity and partners receive a distraction task.
No-planning control condition
ACTIVE COMPARATORA general motivational treatment is provided to each participant. For randomly assigned couples, target persons do not receive instructions for action planning, but perform a distraction task together with their partners.
Interventions
Dyadic planning refers to creating together with a partner if-then plans on when, where, and how the individual target person will implement a new behaviour.
Target persons form action plans on their own.
Both partners are asked to read a brochure that aims at enhancing their motivation to increase levels of moderate physical activity. They respond to a quiz afterwards.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Married and/or cohabiting couples who are currently in a romantic relationship and have been living together for a minimum of 6 months
You may not qualify if:
- Being a minor (i.e., younger than 18 years)
- Restrictions on being physically active as assessed by a risk-check form modelled after the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire
- Being a competitive athlete and engaging in vigorous physical exercise for more than 3 hours per day
- Participating in other intervention programmes targeting physical activity or weight-loss
- Self-reported severe cardio-vascular or pulmonary disease, diseases or injury of the musculoskeletal system, degenerative neurological diseases, paraplegia
- Pregnancy
- A BMI below 17.5
- Insufficient comprehension of the German language
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Freie Universität Berlinlead
- Deutsche Krebshilfe e.V., Bonn (Germany)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Freie Universität Berlin
Berlin, State of Berlin, 14195, Germany
Related Publications (8)
Burkert S, Scholz U, Gralla O, Roigas J, Knoll N. Dyadic planning of health-behavior change after prostatectomy: a randomized-controlled planning intervention. Soc Sci Med. 2011 Sep;73(5):783-92. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.06.016. Epub 2011 Jul 12.
PMID: 21807446BACKGROUNDScholz U, Sniehotta FF, Burkert S, Schwarzer R. Increasing physical exercise levels: age-specific benefits of planning. J Aging Health. 2007 Oct;19(5):851-66. doi: 10.1177/0898264307305207.
PMID: 17827449BACKGROUNDBernstein M, Sloutskis D, Kumanyika S, Sparti A, Schutz Y, Morabia A. Data-based approach for developing a physical activity frequency questionnaire. Am J Epidemiol. 1998 Jan 15;147(2):147-54. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009427.
PMID: 9457004BACKGROUNDMader U, Martin BW, Schutz Y, Marti B. Validity of four short physical activity questionnaires in middle-aged persons. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006 Jul;38(7):1255-66. doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000227310.18902.28.
PMID: 16826022BACKGROUNDSniehotta, F. F., Scholz, U., & Schwarzer, R. (2005). Bridging the intention-behaviour gap: Planning, selfefficacy, and action control in the adoption and maintenance of physical exercise. Psychology & Health, 20, 143-160.
BACKGROUNDSchulz, U., & Schwarzer, R. (2004). Long-term effects of spousal support on coping with cancer after surgery. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23, 716-732.
BACKGROUNDLewis MA, Rook KS. Social control in personal relationships: impact on health behaviors and psychological distress. Health Psychol. 1999 Jan;18(1):63-71. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.18.1.63.
PMID: 9925047BACKGROUNDKnoll N, Hohl DH, Keller J, Schuez N, Luszczynska A, Burkert S. Effects of dyadic planning on physical activity in couples: A randomized controlled trial. Health Psychol. 2017 Jan;36(1):8-20. doi: 10.1037/hea0000423. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
PMID: 27642760DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Nina Knoll, Univ.-Prof.
Freie Universität Berlin
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Univ.-Prof. Dr. Nina Knoll
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 30, 2013
First Posted
October 16, 2013
Study Start
March 1, 2013
Primary Completion
February 1, 2015
Study Completion
January 1, 2016
Last Updated
January 6, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-01