Emergence Times and Airway Reactions in General Laryngeal Mask Airway Anesthesia
1 other identifier
interventional
352
1 country
4
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is first to assess if desflurane is superior in order to achieve a faster emergence from anesthesia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Feb 2015
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 12, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 23, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2016
CompletedOctober 6, 2016
October 1, 2016
1 year
December 12, 2014
October 5, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
time of emergence from anesthesia
time of emergence from anesthesia defined as time between cessation of anesthesia until patient is able to state his/her date of birth on command
up to 15 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Airway reactions (Incidence of intraoperative coughs, laryngospasm)
up to 2 hours
Emergence times
up to 15 minutes
Study Arms (3)
desflurane
EXPERIMENTALSuprane® Dose: 0.8 MAC / 4-5 vol. % Mode of administration: inhalation with laryngeal mask One application
sevoflurane
ACTIVE COMPARATORSevoflurane: Dose: 0.8 MAC / 1.2-1.4 vol.% Mode of administration: inhalation with laryngeal mask One application
propofol
ACTIVE COMPARATORPropofol Dose: 5-7 mg kg-1 h-1 to maintain a BIS index value between 40 and 60 Mode of administration: intravenous One application
Interventions
inhalation with laryngeal mask to maintain anaesthesia
inhalation with laryngeal mask to maintain anaesthesia
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Planned anesthesia with use of LMA (laryngeal mask airway)
- Planned duration of anesthesia between 0.5 and 2 hours
- Age between 18-75 years
- Both gender
- Body mass index (BMI) \<35
- ASA 1-3
- Written informed consent prior to study participation
You may not qualify if:
- Planned additional regional and local anesthesia
- Contra-indication for the use of a laryngeal mask airway
- Asthma
- COPD IV
- Known allergy or hypersensitivity to any drugs administered during this study
- Women who are pregnant, breast-feeding or women of childbearing potential not using adequate contraceptive methods
- Participation in a drug or device trial within the previous 30 days.
- Patients legally unable to give written informed consent.
- Patients with severe psychiatric disorders
- Recent (\<6 months) history of alcohol or drug abuse
- Patients with severe neuropsychiatric disorders
- Non-fluency in German language
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (4)
RWTH Aachen University; Department of Anesthesia
Aachen, D-52074, Germany
Martha-Maria Hospital Halle Dölau gGmbH, Department of Anesthesia
Halle, 06120, Germany
Kreiskliniken Reutlingen, Department of Anesthesia
Reutlingen, 73764, Germany
University Hospital Ulm, Department of Anesthesia
Ulm, 89075, Germany
Related Publications (2)
Kowark A, Rossaint R, Puhringer F, Keszei AP, Fritz H, Froba G, Rex C, Haas H, Otto V, Coburn M; Study Collaborators. Emergence times and airway reactions during general anaesthesia with remifentanil and a laryngeal mask airway: A multicentre randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2018 Aug;35(8):588-597. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000852.
PMID: 29916859DERIVEDStevanovic A, Rossaint R, Keszei AP, Fritz H, Froba G, Puhringer F, Coburn M. Emergence times and airway reactions in general laryngeal mask airway anesthesia: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2015 Jul 26;16:316. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0855-2.
PMID: 26210907DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mark Coburn, Prof.
University Hospital, Aachen
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 12, 2014
First Posted
December 23, 2014
Study Start
February 1, 2015
Primary Completion
February 1, 2016
Study Completion
February 1, 2016
Last Updated
October 6, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-10