Ocriplasmin for Vitreomacular Traction/Symptomatic Vitreomacular Adhesion
Assessment of Anatomical and Functional Outcomes in Subjects Treated With Ocriplasmin for Vitreomacular Traction/Symptomatic Vitreomacular Adhesion (VMT/sVMA)
1 other identifier
interventional
62
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to observe the anatomical and functional outcomes of ocriplasmin (JETREA™®) over a 6-month period.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started May 2015
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 17, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 23, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 26, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 11, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 9, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 23, 2018
CompletedAugust 21, 2018
October 1, 2017
7 months
December 17, 2014
May 3, 2017
July 23, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of Subjects With Non-surgical Resolution of Focal VMT/sVMA at Day 28, as Determined by Central Reading Center (CRC) Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) Evaluation
Vitreous separation was assessed, by SD-OCT according to CRC OCT image reading, into 1 of 12 categories, where the targeted status of VMA resolution was 7=Vitreous attached only at optic nerve (ON) or at ON and elsewhere, but not attached in macular, 9=Vitreous visible with complete separation and no attachment, and 10=No visible vitreous separation, which needed to be reached without prior vitrectomy. The assessment of resolution of VMT/sVMA was based upon the anatomical resolution of VMA only, i.e. no resolution of the related symptoms was considered. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis.
Day 28
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Change From Baseline in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Distance at Days 7, 28, 90, and 180
Baseline (Day 0), Day 7, Day 28, Day 90, Day 180
Percentage of Subjects With Closure of Macular Hole (MH), at Days 7, 28, 90, and 180 (if Present at Baseline)
Day 7, Day 28, Day 90, Day 180
Percentage of Subjects With Non-surgical Resolution of VMT/sVMA at Days 7, 90, and 180
Baseline (Day 0), Day 7, Day 90, Day 180
Percentage of Subjects Experiencing Pars Plana Vitrectomy (PPV) at Day 180
Day 180
Change From Baseline in Central Foveal Thickness at Days 28 and 180
Baseline (Day 0), Day 28, Day 180
Study Arms (1)
Ocriplasmin
EXPERIMENTALOcriplasmin 0.125 mg in a 0.1 mL volume administered as a single dose by intravitreal (IVT) injection
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of VMT/sVMA, with evidence of focal VMT visible on Spectral Domain - Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT).
- Read, sign, and date an Institutional Review Board/Ethics Committee-approved informed consent form.
- Willing and able to attend all study visits.
You may not qualify if:
- Women of childbearing potential if pregnant, test positive on a urine pregnancy test, intend to become pregnant during the study period, breastfeeding, or not in agreement to use adequate birth control methods to prevent pregnancy throughout the study.
- Hypersensitivity to ocriplasmin or any of the JETREA™® excipients.
- Active or suspected intraocular or periocular infection in either eye.
- Participation in any interventional clinical trial within 30 days prior to baseline.
- Presence of epiretinal membrane (ERM) over the macula at baseline in the study eye.
- Broad VMT/VMA \> 1500 microns at baseline in the study eye.
- History of vitrectomy in the study eye.
- History of laser photocoagulation to the macula in the study eye.
- Any relevant concomitant ocular condition in the study eye that, in the opinion of the Investigator, could be expected to worsen or require surgical intervention during the study period.
- Macular hole of \> 400 microns diameter in the study eye.
- High myopia in the study eye.
- Pseudo-exfoliation, Marfan's syndrome, phacodonesis, or any other finding in the study eye that, in the Investigator's opinion, suggests lens/zonular instability.
- Aphakia in the study eye.
- History of retinal detachment in the study eye.
- Recent ocular surgery or ocular injection in the study eye within the past 90 days (including laser therapy).
- +4 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Alcon Researchlead
Study Sites (1)
Contact Alcon Laboratories (Australia) for Trial Locations
New South Wales, 2113, Australia
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Worldwide Medical Affairs Director, GMA Retina Lucentis
- Organization
- Alcon, A Novartis Division
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Associate Dir of Operations, Ophthalmology, GMA
Alcon, A Novartis Division
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 17, 2014
First Posted
December 23, 2014
Study Start
May 26, 2015
Primary Completion
December 11, 2015
Study Completion
May 9, 2016
Last Updated
August 21, 2018
Results First Posted
July 23, 2018
Record last verified: 2017-10