Assessment of Patients Treated With JETREA® for Vitreomacular Traction
Assessment of Anatomical and Functional Outcomes in Patients Treated With Ocriplasmin for Vitreomacular Traction/Symptomatic Vitreomacular Adhesion (VMT/sVMA)
2 other identifiers
interventional
628
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to observe the anatomical and functional outcomes of ocriplasmin (JETREA®) over a 6-month follow-up period.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Apr 2014
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 11, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 14, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 12, 2016
CompletedOctober 12, 2016
August 1, 2016
1.4 years
January 11, 2014
August 11, 2016
August 19, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Proportion of Subjects With Nonsurgical Resolution of Focal Vitreomacular Traction (VMT/VMA) at Day 28, as Determined by Central Reading Center (CRC) Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) Evaluation
Vitreous separation was assessed by SD-OCT using scores ranging from 1 (vitreous attached from macula to ON; separated elsewhere cannot determine foveal) to 12 (unable to determine state of separation). Nonsurgical resolution was defined as a change from baseline score of 5/6/8 to 7/9/10 at Day 28. The assessment of resolution of VMT/sVMA was based upon the anatomical resolution of VMA only, i.e. no resolution of the related symptoms was considered. Thus, the term VMA is used interchangeably with VMT/sVMA. Proportion of subjects is presented as a percentage, with percentage based on the number of subjects who have VMT/sVMA at baseline and SD-OCT value at Day 28. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis.
Baseline, Day 28
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Nonsurgical Change From Baseline in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Distance
Baseline (Day 0), Day 28, Day 90, Day 180
Proportion of Subjects With Nonsurgical Closure of Macular Hole (MH), if Present at Baseline
Day 28, Day 90, Day 180
Proportion of Subjects With Nonsurgical Resolution of VMT/sVMA
Baseline, Day 90, Day 180
Proportion of Subjects Experiencing Pars Plana Vitrectomy (PPV) at Day 180
Day 180
Mean Nonsurgical Change From Baseline in Central Foveal Thickness (CFT)
Baseline (Day 0), Day 28, Day 180
Study Arms (1)
Ocriplasmin
EXPERIMENTALOcriplasmin 0.125 mg in a 0.1 mL volume administered as a single dose by intravitreal injection
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of vitreomacular traction/symptomatic vitreomacular adhesion (VMT/sVMA), with evidence of focal VMA visible on Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT).
- Read, sign, and date an Institutional Review Board/Ethics Committee-approved informed consent form.
You may not qualify if:
- Women of childbearing potential if pregnant, breastfeeding, or not in agreement to use adequate birth control methods to prevent pregnancy throughout the study.
- Hypersensitivity to ocriplasmin or any of the JETREA® excipients.
- Active or suspected intraocular or periocular infection.
- Presence of Epiretinal Membrane (ERM) over the macula at baseline.
- Broad VMT/VMA \>1500 microns at baseline.
- History of vitrectomy in the study eye.
- History of laser photocoagulation to the macula in the study eye.
- Any relevant concomitant ocular condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, could be expected to worsen or require surgical intervention during the study period.
- Macular hole of \>400µm diameter in the study eye.
- High myopia in the study eye.
- Pseudo-exfoliation, Marfan's syndrome, phacodonesis or any other finding in the Investigator's opinion suggesting lens/zonular instability.
- Aphakia.
- History of retinal detachment.
- Diabetic retinopathy, ischaemic retinopathies, retinal vein occlusions.
- Recent ocular surgery or ocular injection.
- +4 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Alcon Researchlead
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- EMEA Medical Affairs Lead, Pharma
- Organization
- Alcon, a Novartis company
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Sr Clinical Manager, Ophtha-GCRA
Alcon, a Novartis Company
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 11, 2014
First Posted
January 14, 2014
Study Start
April 1, 2014
Primary Completion
September 1, 2015
Study Completion
September 1, 2015
Last Updated
October 12, 2016
Results First Posted
October 12, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-08