Does Trans-Cutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) Alleviate The Pain Experienced During Bone Marrow Sampling?
TENS
1 other identifier
interventional
70
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The approach of this study will be to answer the question does high-frequency stimulation Trans-Cutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) alleviate the pain experienced during the bone marrow sampling procedure in addition to the standard analgesia given (ie. local anaesthetic with or without inhaled nitrous oxide). Null hypothesis: TENS does not alleviate the pain experienced during the bone marrow sampling procedure in addition to the standard analgesia given
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable pain
Started Feb 2014
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 3, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 9, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 30, 2019
CompletedOctober 8, 2019
September 1, 2019
10 months
December 3, 2013
December 1, 2015
September 27, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Perception of Pain Will be Measured Using a Validated Numerical 0-10 Pain Scale Where 0 = no Pain and 10 = Worst Possible Pain
To establish the effect of high-frequency stimulation TENS on the pain experienced by patients undergoing a bone-marrow biopsy, using standard technique with local anaesthetic. The perception of pain will be measured using a pain scale directly after and 24 hours after bone-marrow sampling in patients randomly allocated and blinded to the use of intervention-TENS (IT) or control-TENS (CT) in addition to local anaesthesia.
Post procedure and 24 hours
Study Arms (2)
Trans-cutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS)
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe Intervention-TENS group will have 2 electrodes applied proximal to the painful area along neuro-anatomical distribution (electrode-one placed 5cm superior and 2cm medial to the posterior superior iliac spine and electrode-two placed 5cm medial to the posterior superior iliac spine) in the same way as the control-TENS group. The concealed electrical parameter in this group will be within the therapeutic window, that is, well above the sensory detection threshold but below the pain threshold giving a "strong but comfortable sensation". From previous studies, this is likely to be 50-110Hz. The device will be activated prior to entry into the treatment room and 2 minutes before administration of local anaesthetic and for 2 minutes after removal of the biopsy needle. This will cover the expected duration of pain as assessed in the pilot study. All patients will receive standard pain relief (ie. local anaesthetic with or without inhaled nitrous oxide)
Trans-cutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation (TENS)
PLACEBO COMPARATORPatients in the CT group will have 2 gel-electrodes applied proximal to the sampling area (usually the right posterior superior iliac crest). The Control-TENS device will be identical in appearance to the "Intervention-TENS" device with a functioning display panel. The concealed electrical parameter in this group will be titrated to and set at the sensory detection. All patients will receive standard pain relief (ie. local anaesthetic with or without inhaled nitrous oxide)
Interventions
Patients in whom a bone marrow biopsy is planned will be randomised to one of two groups - a Placebo Comparator group where the TENS machine will be set at the lowest sensory threshold and an Active Comparator group where the TENS machine will be set at a recognised analgesic level (\>50Hz and below the pain threshold for the patient).
All patients will receive standard pain relief (ie. local anaesthetic with or without inhaled nitrous oxide)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study.
- Male or Female, aged 18 years or above.
- Participants are those medical patients seen in the haematology outpatients clinic for whom a bone-marrow trephine biopsy is deemed necessary either for diagnosis, staging or disease monitoring purposes. Participants are either new patients or routine follow ups.
- Participant is able (in the Investigators opinion) and willing to comply with all study requirements.
- Participant is willing to allow his or her General Practitioner to be notified of participation in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Any known adverse reaction to high-frequency TENS or electrode gel pads
- Any significant disease or disorder which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may either put the participants at risk because of participation in the study, or may influence the result of the study, or the participant's ability to participate in the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust
Plymouth, Devon, PL6 8DH, United Kingdom
Related Publications (2)
Bennett MI, Hughes N, Johnson MI. Methodological quality in randomised controlled trials of transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation for pain: low fidelity may explain negative findings. Pain. 2011 Jun;152(6):1226-1232. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.12.009. Epub 2011 Mar 23.
PMID: 21435786BACKGROUNDTucker DL, Rockett M, Hasan M, Poplar S, Rule SA. Does transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) alleviate the pain experienced during bone marrow sampling in addition to standard techniques? A randomised, double-blinded, controlled trial. J Clin Pathol. 2015 Jun;68(6):479-83. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2015-202908. Epub 2015 Mar 10.
PMID: 25759407DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr David Tucker
- Organization
- Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Simon AJ Rule, MBChB, MPhil
University Hospital Plymouth NHS Trust
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sarah L Poplar, MB ChB
University Hospital Plymouth NHS Trust
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 3, 2013
First Posted
December 9, 2013
Study Start
February 1, 2014
Primary Completion
December 1, 2014
Study Completion
December 1, 2014
Last Updated
October 8, 2019
Results First Posted
September 30, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-09