NCT02005354

Brief Summary

The approach of this study will be to answer the question does high-frequency stimulation Trans-Cutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) alleviate the pain experienced during the bone marrow sampling procedure in addition to the standard analgesia given (ie. local anaesthetic with or without inhaled nitrous oxide). Null hypothesis: TENS does not alleviate the pain experienced during the bone marrow sampling procedure in addition to the standard analgesia given

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
70

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable pain

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2014

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 3, 2013

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 9, 2013

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2014

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2014

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2014

Completed
4.8 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

September 30, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

October 8, 2019

Status Verified

September 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

10 months

First QC Date

December 3, 2013

Results QC Date

December 1, 2015

Last Update Submit

September 27, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

PainBone marrow aspirationtrephine biopsy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Perception of Pain Will be Measured Using a Validated Numerical 0-10 Pain Scale Where 0 = no Pain and 10 = Worst Possible Pain

    To establish the effect of high-frequency stimulation TENS on the pain experienced by patients undergoing a bone-marrow biopsy, using standard technique with local anaesthetic. The perception of pain will be measured using a pain scale directly after and 24 hours after bone-marrow sampling in patients randomly allocated and blinded to the use of intervention-TENS (IT) or control-TENS (CT) in addition to local anaesthesia.

    Post procedure and 24 hours

Study Arms (2)

Trans-cutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The Intervention-TENS group will have 2 electrodes applied proximal to the painful area along neuro-anatomical distribution (electrode-one placed 5cm superior and 2cm medial to the posterior superior iliac spine and electrode-two placed 5cm medial to the posterior superior iliac spine) in the same way as the control-TENS group. The concealed electrical parameter in this group will be within the therapeutic window, that is, well above the sensory detection threshold but below the pain threshold giving a "strong but comfortable sensation". From previous studies, this is likely to be 50-110Hz. The device will be activated prior to entry into the treatment room and 2 minutes before administration of local anaesthetic and for 2 minutes after removal of the biopsy needle. This will cover the expected duration of pain as assessed in the pilot study. All patients will receive standard pain relief (ie. local anaesthetic with or without inhaled nitrous oxide)

Device: Trans-cutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS)Drug: Standard pain relief (ie. local anaesthetic with or without inhaled nitrous oxide)

Trans-cutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation (TENS)

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Patients in the CT group will have 2 gel-electrodes applied proximal to the sampling area (usually the right posterior superior iliac crest). The Control-TENS device will be identical in appearance to the "Intervention-TENS" device with a functioning display panel. The concealed electrical parameter in this group will be titrated to and set at the sensory detection. All patients will receive standard pain relief (ie. local anaesthetic with or without inhaled nitrous oxide)

Device: Trans-cutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS)Drug: Standard pain relief (ie. local anaesthetic with or without inhaled nitrous oxide)

Interventions

Patients in whom a bone marrow biopsy is planned will be randomised to one of two groups - a Placebo Comparator group where the TENS machine will be set at the lowest sensory threshold and an Active Comparator group where the TENS machine will be set at a recognised analgesic level (\>50Hz and below the pain threshold for the patient).

Trans-cutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation (TENS)Trans-cutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS)

All patients will receive standard pain relief (ie. local anaesthetic with or without inhaled nitrous oxide)

Trans-cutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation (TENS)Trans-cutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study.
  • Male or Female, aged 18 years or above.
  • Participants are those medical patients seen in the haematology outpatients clinic for whom a bone-marrow trephine biopsy is deemed necessary either for diagnosis, staging or disease monitoring purposes. Participants are either new patients or routine follow ups.
  • Participant is able (in the Investigators opinion) and willing to comply with all study requirements.
  • Participant is willing to allow his or her General Practitioner to be notified of participation in the study.

You may not qualify if:

  • Any known adverse reaction to high-frequency TENS or electrode gel pads
  • Any significant disease or disorder which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may either put the participants at risk because of participation in the study, or may influence the result of the study, or the participant's ability to participate in the study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust

Plymouth, Devon, PL6 8DH, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Bennett MI, Hughes N, Johnson MI. Methodological quality in randomised controlled trials of transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation for pain: low fidelity may explain negative findings. Pain. 2011 Jun;152(6):1226-1232. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.12.009. Epub 2011 Mar 23.

    PMID: 21435786BACKGROUND
  • Tucker DL, Rockett M, Hasan M, Poplar S, Rule SA. Does transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) alleviate the pain experienced during bone marrow sampling in addition to standard techniques? A randomised, double-blinded, controlled trial. J Clin Pathol. 2015 Jun;68(6):479-83. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2015-202908. Epub 2015 Mar 10.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr David Tucker
Organization
Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust

Study Officials

  • Simon AJ Rule, MBChB, MPhil

    University Hospital Plymouth NHS Trust

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Sarah L Poplar, MB ChB

    University Hospital Plymouth NHS Trust

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 3, 2013

First Posted

December 9, 2013

Study Start

February 1, 2014

Primary Completion

December 1, 2014

Study Completion

December 1, 2014

Last Updated

October 8, 2019

Results First Posted

September 30, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-09

Locations