NCT02808637

Brief Summary

This is a randomized double-blind controlled study and was performed to compare effects of rapid injection without aspiration and 10-second manual pressure before injection on pain severity and crying time in 4-6-month-old infants given the vaccine DTaP/IPV/Hib. The study population included all the infants presenting for DTaP/IPV/Hib to two family health centers between April and August in 2015. The study sample included 128 infants based on confidence interval of 95% and statistical power of 80%. The sample was divided into four groups; i.e. manual pressure, rapid injection without aspiration, manual pressure combined with rapid injection without aspiration and control groups. There were 32 infants in each group. Gender was adjusted in all groups. Stratified and block randomizations were used.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
128

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable pain

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2015

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2015

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2015

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2016

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 10, 2016

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 22, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

June 22, 2016

Status Verified

June 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

June 10, 2016

Last Update Submit

June 17, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

Pain managementvaccinationmanual pressureneedle aspiration

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Pain severity

    Video recordings obtained were evaluated by two pain specialists separately by using NIPS. The specialists were blinded to the groups to eliminate possible mistakes in observations and the possibility of taking sides and to avoid bias. The scores assigned by the specialists were used to determine pain scores before, during and after vaccine injections. Pain severity, were expressed as the average score NIPS. When the opportunity to observe the baby again during the data collection and it was observed that no adverse effects. Therefore study has been completed with the same 128 babies.

    6 MONTHS

  • Crying time

    Video recordings taken were watched by the same researcher and crying time (sec) before, during and after vaccine injections was calculated for each infant. When the opportunity to observe the baby again during the data collection and it was observed that no adverse effects. Therefore study has been completed with the same 128 babies.

    6 MONTHS

  • Physiological Changes (heart rate and oxygen saturation)

    the probe of pulse oximetry was attached to the foot not injected vaccine to measure oxygen saturation (%) and heart rate (min) before, during and after the injections in each child. When the opportunity to observe the baby again during the data collection and it was observed that no adverse effects. Therefore study has been completed with the same 128 babies.

    6 MONTHS

Study Arms (4)

Manual Pressure

EXPERIMENTAL
Other: Manual Pressure

Rapid Injection without Aspiration

EXPERIMENTAL
Other: Rapid Injection without Aspiration

Manual Pressure + Rapid Injection without Aspiration

EXPERIMENTAL
Other: Manual Pressure + Rapid Injection without Aspiration

Control

EXPERIMENTAL
Other: Control

Interventions

First, the infants were seated on their mothers' knees. Next, 10-second manual pressure was applied on the vaccine injection site. Then DTaP/IPV/Hib was administered in accordance with the conventional injection technique.

Manual Pressure

First, the infants were seated on their mothers' knees. Then DTaP/IPV/Hib was administered by using rapid injection without aspiration technique.

Rapid Injection without Aspiration

First, the infants were seated on their mothers' knees. Next, 10-second manual pressure was applied on the vaccine injection site. Then DTaP/IPV/Hib was administered by using the rapid injection without aspiration technique.

Manual Pressure + Rapid Injection without Aspiration
ControlOTHER

First, the infants were seated on their mothers' knees. Then DTaP/IPV/Hib was administered by using the conventional injection technique.

Control

Eligibility Criteria

Age4 Months - 6 Months
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Healthy infants who were aged 4-6 months, had the percentiles of 3P - 97P, were born at term and were not given any analgesics before immunization and whose mothers gave written informed consent were included.

You may not qualify if:

  • Infants whose percentiles were below 3P and above 97P and who had acute infectious diseases, underwent topical anesthesia and/or took analgesics were excluded from the study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

PainAgnosia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPerceptual DisordersNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNervous System Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
PREVENTION
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
PhD RN, ASSISTANT PROFESSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 10, 2016

First Posted

June 22, 2016

Study Start

April 1, 2015

Primary Completion

August 1, 2015

Study Completion

January 1, 2016

Last Updated

June 22, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-06