Physical Exercise Prescription With PEdometeR in General Practice for Patients With Cardiovascular Risk Factors - PEPPER
PEPPER
1 other identifier
interventional
126
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study evaluates the efficacy, in terms of energy expenditure, physical activity level, quality of life, blood pressure, waist circumference and weight, of a general practice based intervention involving a personalised physical exercise medical prescription, the structured delivery of information on the benefits of physical activity, a pedometer, and a pedometer log book, in 35 to 74 year old patients with cardiovascular risks factors.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2015
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 10, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 15, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 16, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2018
CompletedAugust 2, 2022
August 1, 2018
3.4 years
December 10, 2014
July 28, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in total energy expenditure by accelerometry at 3 months compared to baseline
The total energy expenditure is measured with a wGT3x-BT Actigraph accelerometer worn at the belt during 7 consecutive days from morning to evening. It is measured in Metabolic Equivalent Task-Minutes per Week.
baseline and 12 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (14)
Change in total energy expenditure by accelerometry at 12 months compared to baseline
baseline and 52 weeks
Change in total energy expenditure by questionnaire at 3 months compared to baseline
baseline and 12 weeks
Change in total energy expenditure by questionnaire at 12 months compared to baseline
baseline and 52 weeks
Change in quality of life at 3 months compared to baseline
baseline and 12 weeks
Change in quality of life at 12 months compared to baseline
baseline and 52 weeks
- +9 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Intervention PPIL
EXPERIMENTALIntervention delivered by the family doctor and based on structured information delivery according to cognitive and behavioural theories, a personalised written physical activity prescription in number of steps per day, a pedometer, and a pedometer logbook similar to diabetes logbooks.
Control OR
ACTIVE COMPARATOROral recommendation of physical exercise delivered by the family doctor.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients consulting their general practitioner for a non-urgent matter
- with regular follow-up every 3 months for hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia or non insulin dependent type 2 diabetes.
- judged insufficiently active by their general practitioner based on negative answers to the questions : "Do you practice a physical activity or cycling more than an hour per week?" and "Does your occupation involve physical exertion?"
You may not qualify if:
- contraindication to moderate physical activity,
- non autonomous for walking,
- with cognitive or psychiatric impairment limiting the full understanding of the study,
- suffering from another limiting disease (coronary insufficiency, chronic cardiac failure, etc),
- who don't speak French,
- refusing to participate.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Angers University Hospital
Angers, 49933, France
Related Publications (2)
Bellanger W, Peurois M, Connan L, Navasiolava N, Missud D, Py T, Begue C. Comparing physical activity prescription with verbal advice for general practice patients with cardiovascular risk factors: results from the PEPPER randomised controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2023 Jul 20;23(1):1402. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16302-6.
PMID: 37475036DERIVEDMissud DC, Parot-Schinkel E, Connan L, Vielle B, Huez JF. Physical activity prescription for general practice patients with cardiovascular risk factors-the PEPPER randomised controlled trial protocol. BMC Public Health. 2019 Jun 3;19(1):688. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7048-y.
PMID: 31159805DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Denise Jolivot, MD
University Hospital, Angers
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Laurent Connan, MD
Medical School, Angers
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 10, 2014
First Posted
December 15, 2014
Study Start
March 16, 2015
Primary Completion
August 1, 2018
Study Completion
August 1, 2018
Last Updated
August 2, 2022
Record last verified: 2018-08