Effect of Standardized Consent for Urogynecological Procedures on Patient Satisfaction
1 other identifier
interventional
64
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The investigators aim is to augment the current process for surgical consent for patients undergoing urogynecological procedures by incorporating visual media. We propose that visual media will be an effective and efficient addition to the standard of care in urogynecological consents and will improve patient understanding and satisfaction. Our randomized controlled trial will investigate the effect of standardizing the consent for three urogynecologic procedures (vaginal hysterectomy, robotic sacrocolpopexy, and sub-urethral sling) using visual media, on patients' understanding of, and satisfaction with, their procedure. Our primary outcome will be patient's knowledge score at the end of the pre-operative clinic visit, and secondary outcomes include patients' satisfaction, subjective understanding of their procedure, immediate pre-operative and post-operative knowledge, and number of post-operative encounters. Participants will be followed up to their post-operative clinic visit.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2014
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 10, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 10, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2018
CompletedDecember 6, 2018
December 1, 2018
3.7 years
November 10, 2014
December 5, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Patient knowledge score
At the end of the clinic visit, all participating patients will receive a survey to evaluate their objective understanding of their procedures, pre-operative and post-operative expectations.
Within 8 hours of pre-operative clinic visit, which can be up to 10 weeks from time of enrollment
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Patient satisfaction
Within 8 hours of pre-operative clinic visit, which can be up to 10 weeks from time of enrollment
Patient subjective understanding of their procedures
Within 8 hours of pre-operative clinic visit, which can be up to 10 weeks from time of enrollment
Immediate pre-operative knowledge score
Within 24 hours prior to time of surgery
Post-operative knowledge score
Within 8 hours after routine post-operative visit, which is on average within 2 weeks after the time of surgery
Number of post-operative encounters
Followed until scheduled routine post-operative visit, average of 2 weeks after time of surgery
Study Arms (6)
Vaginal hysterectomy counseling
NO INTERVENTIONStandard verbal counseling to consent for vaginal hysterectomy in terms of what the procedures involves, other treatment options, risks, benefits, and what to expect in the pre-op and post-op periods. At the end of the clinic visit, participants will receive a survey to evaluate their understanding of their procedure, pre-operative and post-operative expectations, and satisfaction with their experience. A similar survey will be repeated before their surgery and at their post-operative clinic visit at approximately 1-2 weeks following the surgery.
Vaginal hysterectomy visual aid
EXPERIMENTALIn addition to standard verbal counseling, intervention will include a standardized visual presentation for vaginal hysterectomy. Time spent viewing the visual presentation will be recorded to assess for the efficiency of this quality improvement intervention. At the end of the clinic visit, participants will receive a survey to evaluate their understanding of their procedure, pre-operative and post-operative expectations, and satisfaction with their experience. A similar survey will be repeated before their surgery and at their post-operative clinic visit at approximately 1-2 weeks following the surgery.
Robotic sacrocolpopexy counseling
NO INTERVENTIONStandard verbal counseling to consent for robotic sacrocolpopexy in terms of what the procedures involves, other treatment options, risks, benefits, and what to expect in the pre-op and post-op periods. At the end of the clinic visit, participants will receive a survey to evaluate their understanding of their procedure, pre-operative and post-operative expectations, and satisfaction with their experience. A similar survey will be repeated before their surgery and at their post-operative clinic visit at approximately 1-2 weeks following the surgery.
Robotic sacrocolpopexy visual aid
EXPERIMENTALIn addition to standard verbal counseling, intervention will include a standardized visual presentation for robotic sacrocolpopexy. Time spent viewing the visual presentation will be recorded to assess for the efficiency of this quality improvement intervention. At the end of the clinic visit, participants will receive a survey to evaluate their understanding of their procedure, pre-operative and post-operative expectations, and satisfaction with their experience. A similar survey will be repeated before their surgery and at their post-operative clinic visit at approximately 1-2 weeks following the surgery.
Sub-urethral sling counseling
NO INTERVENTIONStandard verbal counseling to consent for sub-urethral sling in terms of what the procedures involves, other treatment options, risks, benefits, and what to expect in the pre-op and post-op periods. At the end of the clinic visit, participants will receive a survey to evaluate their understanding of their procedure, pre-operative and post-operative expectations, and satisfaction with their experience. A similar survey will be repeated before their surgery and at their post-operative clinic visit at approximately 1-2 weeks following the surgery.
Sub-urethral sling visual aid
EXPERIMENTALIn addition to standard verbal counseling, intervention will include a standardized visual presentation for sub-urethral sling. Time spent viewing the visual presentation will be recorded to assess for the efficiency of this quality improvement intervention. At the end of the clinic visit, participants will receive a survey to evaluate their understanding of their procedure, pre-operative and post-operative expectations, and satisfaction with their experience. A similar survey will be repeated before their surgery and at their post-operative clinic visit at approximately 1-2 weeks following the surgery.
Interventions
Visual presentations will address what type of procedure they will undergo, the risks and benefits of the procedure (i.e. injury to nearby organs, risks of infection and bleeding, risk of re-operation), alternative treatments to the procedure, what to expect during the pre-operative period, and what to expect in the post-operative period (i.e. urinary catheter, constipation, pain management, hospital stay).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Undergoing vaginal hysterectomy, robotic sacrocolpopexy, or sub-urethral sling
- English speaking
- Written, informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- None
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
BIDMC
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States
Related Publications (4)
Adams SR, Hacker MR, Merport Modest A, Rosenblatt PL, Elkadry EA. Informed consent for sacrocolpopexy: is counseling effective in achieving patient comprehension? Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2012 Nov-Dec;18(6):352-6. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e31827816c5.
PMID: 23143430BACKGROUNDNehme J, El-Khani U, Chow A, Hakky S, Ahmed AR, Purkayastha S. The use of multimedia consent programs for surgical procedures: a systematic review. Surg Innov. 2013 Feb;20(1):13-23. doi: 10.1177/1553350612446352. Epub 2012 May 14.
PMID: 22589017BACKGROUNDSchenker Y, Fernandez A, Sudore R, Schillinger D. Interventions to improve patient comprehension in informed consent for medical and surgical procedures: a systematic review. Med Decis Making. 2011 Jan-Feb;31(1):151-73. doi: 10.1177/0272989X10364247. Epub 2010 Mar 31.
PMID: 20357225BACKGROUNDWang R, Haviland MJ, Hacker MR, Lefevre R. Effect of Visual Aids During Surgical Consents on Patient Understanding and Satisfaction. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2020 Dec 1;26(12):746-750. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000703.
PMID: 31135580DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Roger Lefevre, MD
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Instructor in Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 10, 2014
First Posted
December 10, 2014
Study Start
December 1, 2014
Primary Completion
August 1, 2018
Study Completion
August 1, 2018
Last Updated
December 6, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share